:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than multilib (1.7-3)
warning: libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than extra (1.7-2)
warning: xcb-proto: local (1.7-1) is newer than extra (1.6-2)
I thought it'd just be an outdated mirror or something, but a check on
On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than multilib (1.7-3)
warning: libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than extra (1.7-2)
warning: xcb-proto: local (1.7-1) is newer than extra (1.6-2)
I
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre Ferrando alfer...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than multilib (1.7-3)
warning: libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than
On 25 January 2012 09:41, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre Ferrando alfer...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer
On Monday 23 Jan 2012 21:53:25 Norbert Zeh wrote:
Laptop/intel graphics: Boots/reboots/halts all fine, as long as I don't
suspend to RAM. After suspend to RAM, screen backlight is on, but screen
remains black until turning the machine off. Apart from the screen issue,
the machine seems to
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Alexandre Ferrando alfer...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 January 2012 09:41, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre Ferrando alfer...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote:
::
Peter Lewis [2012.01.25 0919 +]:
On Monday 23 Jan 2012 21:53:25 Norbert Zeh wrote:
Laptop/intel graphics: Boots/reboots/halts all fine, as long as I don't
suspend to RAM. After suspend to RAM, screen backlight is on, but screen
remains black until turning the machine off. Apart from
Guys,
I have found a logic error in pacman (I think). I don't like replacing both
the kernel and kernel-lts in the same 'pacman -Syu' call. So I answered 'no'
when prompted to 'Replace kernel26-lts with core/linux-lts? [Y/n] n'. However,
then pacman fails to install anything because 'linux-lts
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:07 PM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Guys,
I have found a logic error in pacman (I think). I don't like replacing both
the kernel and kernel-lts in the same 'pacman -Syu' call. So I answered 'no'
when prompted to 'Replace kernel26-lts with
On 01/25/2012 08:07 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I have found a logic error in pacman (I think). I don't like replacing both
the kernel and kernel-lts in the same 'pacman -Syu' call. So I answered 'no'
when prompted to 'Replace kernel26-lts with core/linux-lts? [Y/n] n'. However,
then
On 01/25/2012 08:16 AM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote:
I think pacman is right. What you asked would make the installation
inconsistent: you don't want to replace kernel-lts and will try to
install linux-lts, which conflicts with the former. I think you should
first use pacman -Syu --ignore
The screen brightness increase and decrease keys on my laptop seem to be
no longer working. They were definitely working a week or so ago, so
I'm thinking some recent upgrade is responsible.
It's not that the keypress is registering and the app just doesn't
brighten the screen. But rather,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:13 PM, David Rosenstrauch dar...@darose.net wrote:
The screen brightness increase and decrease keys on my laptop seem to be no
longer working.
This is udev's fault, udev-179 in testing should have fixed it. I'll
move it to core asap.
-t
Try installing udev-git from the AUR. I had a similar problem with the
Fn key in combination with the F1-F12 keys on my laptop; X wasn't
registering any keypress events for those keystrokes. A thread on the
forums about a related issue [1] suggested trying udev-git and it solved
the problem for
On 01/25/2012 11:18 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:13 PM, David Rosenstrauchdar...@darose.net wrote:
The screen brightness increase and decrease keys on my laptop seem to be no
longer working.
This is udev's fault, udev-179 in testing should have fixed it. I'll
move it to
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:22 PM, David Rosenstrauch dar...@darose.net wrote:
On 01/25/2012 11:18 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:13 PM, David Rosenstrauchdar...@darose.net
wrote:
The screen brightness increase and decrease keys on my laptop seem to be
no
longer working.
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:07:10 -0600
David C. Rankin drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Guys,
I have found a logic error in pacman (I think). I don't like replacing both
the kernel and kernel-lts in the same 'pacman -Syu' call. So I answered 'no'
when prompted to 'Replace kernel26-lts
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:43:57 +0100
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:25:12 -0600
schrieb Leonid Isaev lis...@umail.iu.edu:
I have just noticed a problem with xfce clock panel-plugin:
in the LCD mode instead of showing 8 it shown 0, so 6:18 become
10:10.
Hi,
Am 24.01.2012 16:09, schrieb Denis A. Altoé Falqueto:
I agree, of course. But I couldn't find the bug tracker for bluez on its site.
Well, it seems they are using the mailing lists for that kind of things.
I'll subscribe to it and try to mention our problems with it.
Best regards,
Karol
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Leonid Isaev lis...@umail.iu.edu wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:07:10 -0600
David C. Rankin drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Guys,
I have found a logic error in pacman (I think). I don't like replacing both
the kernel and kernel-lts in the same
Hi :)
I wonder if warnings like
# pacman -Syu
warning: qtractor: local (0.5.3.15-2684) is newer than community
(0.5.3-1)
warning: rtirq: local (20111007-1) is newer than archaudio-preview
(20090920-1)
are useful? Once there will be more packages, it will become
uncomfortable to read more
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Ralf Madorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
I wonder if warnings like
are useful? Once there will be more packages, it will become
uncomfortable to read more important output.
This is nothing new, pacman 3 had these too.
You should read the whole output
2012/1/25 Ralf Madorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net:
Hi :)
I wonder if warnings like
# pacman -Syu
warning: qtractor: local (0.5.3.15-2684) is newer than community
(0.5.3-1)
warning: rtirq: local (20111007-1) is newer than archaudio-preview
(20090920-1)
are useful? Once there will be more
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:53:57 +0100
Ralf Madorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
Hi :)
I wonder if warnings like
# pacman -Syu
warning: qtractor: local (0.5.3.15-2684) is newer than community
(0.5.3-1)
warning: rtirq: local (20111007-1) is newer than archaudio-preview
(20090920-1)
On 25.01.12 at 20:01, Paulo Roberto P. Evangelista wrote:
Hi,
When kde 4.8 will be available in extra repossitories??
Soon.
pgpoEpOWbL0TL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 00:02 +0100, Stefan Wilkens wrote:
2012/1/25 Ralf Madorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net:
Hi :)
I wonder if warnings like
# pacman -Syu
warning: qtractor: local (0.5.3.15-2684) is newer than community
(0.5.3-1)
warning: rtirq: local (20111007-1) is newer than
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 00:16 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 00:02 +0100, Stefan Wilkens wrote:
2012/1/25 Ralf Madorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net:
Hi :)
I wonder if warnings like
# pacman -Syu
warning: qtractor: local (0.5.3.15-2684) is newer than community
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 17:09 -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote:
Well, usually people complain that pacman doesn't show enough info... Have you
tried the -q options?
No I didn't.
# pacman -Syup
at the moment only will remove the unwanted output.
Thank you,
Ralf
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Ralf Madorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
# pacman -Syup
at the moment only will remove the unwanted output.
Try hacking the source code: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=123911
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 00:29 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 17:09 -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote:
Well, usually people complain that pacman doesn't show enough info... Have
you
tried the -q options?
No I didn't.
# pacman -Syup
at the moment only will remove the unwanted
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 00:43 +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
Try hacking the source code: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=123911
:)
Am 26.01.2012 00:01, schrieb Paulo Roberto P. Evangelista:
Hi,
When kde 4.8 will be available in extra repossitories??
hey, dont put pressure on the great people compiling, testing and
packing for us. i think, we arch users really cant complain about not
beeing fed with fresh updates.
btw:
32 matches
Mail list logo
