Hello Arch Linux community,
this year I received an extra Christmas present: Bartłomiej Piotrowski asked
me to apply to become an Arch Linux trusted user. Just some days later Ike
Devolder had the same in mind - as I already have a sponsor he promised to
give his vote. Thanks!
My name is
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 18:13:52 -0600, Doug Newgard wrote:
Arch isn't Debian, every binary isn't given it's own package.
When I read the OPs mail, I wanted to write the same. Now I just need
to ad my +1.
I very seldom want split packages, I prefer that Arch Linux very seldom
does split packages
* Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de (Tue, 30 Dec 2014 11:12:45 +0100):
this year I received an extra Christmas present: Bartłomiej
Piotrowski asked me to apply to become an Arch Linux trusted user.
Just some days later Ike Devolder had the same in mind - as I already
have a sponsor he promised to
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 06:18:04PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
2. Is there another virtual machine easy to use, without a huge
learning curve? Any recommendations?
Hello,
You can try QEMU, it has KVM support among many other features. You only
need to `--help' yourself and RTFM and everything
Marcel Korpel marcel.kor...@gmail.com on Tue, 2014/12/30 11:57:
* Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de (Tue, 30 Dec 2014 11:12:45 +0100):
this year I received an extra Christmas present: Bartłomiej
Piotrowski asked me to apply to become an Arch Linux trusted user.
Just some days later Ike Devolder
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:05:03 +0200, psy...@tfwno.gf wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 06:18:04PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
2. Is there another virtual machine easy to use, without a huge
learning curve? Any recommendations?
You can try QEMU, it has KVM support among many other features. You
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:01:16 -0600, Doug Newgard wrote:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 18:39:55 -0600
Troy Engel troyengel+a...@gmail.com wrote:
Nor did I ever claim it was (and what are you even arguing here?)
-- I was careful to mention the packaging tools (RPM/DEB) as both
of these infrastructures
Hello.
I just came across some weird behavior.
A small testcase:
cd /tmp # should be tmpfs
touch tfile
ln -s tfile tlink
cat tlink
When cat executes, it returns with success(0). But, if cat is executed
as root, it fails with a permission denied error.
What's really happening is, the open()
Mohammad_AlSaleh ce.mohammad.alsa...@gmail.com on Tue, 2014/12/30 14:36:
Hello.
I just came across some weird behavior.
A small testcase:
cd /tmp # should be tmpfs
touch tfile
ln -s tfile tlink
cat tlink
When cat executes, it returns with success(0). But, if cat is executed
as
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 01:42:03PM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
Mohammad_AlSaleh ce.mohammad.alsa...@gmail.com on Tue, 2014/12/30 14:36:
Hello.
I just came across some weird behavior.
A small testcase:
cd /tmp # should be tmpfs
touch tfile
ln -s tfile tlink
cat tlink
Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de on Tue, 2014/12/30 13:42:
Mohammad_AlSaleh ce.mohammad.alsa...@gmail.com on Tue, 2014/12/30 14:36:
Hello.
I just came across some weird behavior.
A small testcase:
cd /tmp # should be tmpfs
touch tfile
ln -s tfile tlink
cat tlink
When cat
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 02:02:32PM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de on Tue, 2014/12/30 13:42:
Mohammad_AlSaleh ce.mohammad.alsa...@gmail.com on Tue, 2014/12/30 14:36:
Hello.
I just came across some weird behavior.
A small testcase:
cd /tmp #
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Hopefully the tribal knowledge how maintainers decide what becomes a
suggested and what becomes a recommended dependency will be add by Troy
to the Debian and Ubuntu Wikis. The editing of the Arch Wiki IMO is
Hello,
I found a symlink named os-release in the /etc directory. The package it
points to is owned by filesystem, but I don't know which package the
symlink belongs to. And I think the symlink is world writable by
mistake, but I don't know to whom should I report the bug.
Does anyone know
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014, Neven Sajko wrote:
Hello,
I found a symlink named os-release in the /etc directory. The package it
points to is owned by filesystem, but I don't know which package the
symlink belongs to. And I think the symlink is world writable by
mistake, but I don't know to whom should
I guess that's why the plan9port ls presented it differently :)
Thank you Scott, I should have first searched for more info on symlinks.
I just noticed that `makepkg` no longer accepts '--asroot', does that
mean there now is no way to convince `makepkg` to build despite being
run as root?
/M
P.S. I am fully aware of the problems with building as root, but as I'm
only building packages I'm myself creating, and doing it in a
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Leonid Isaev lis...@umail.iu.edu wrote:
Well, other distros following certain packaging guidelines doesn't imply that
Arch should follow them as well. If you subscribe e.g. to fedora-devel you'll
see how much more complicated compared to Arch the packaging
Random suggestion: have you tried asking for a password reset?
https://bugs.archlinux.org/lostpw
On 29 December 2014 at 22:57, Minh Nhut Duong nhu...@gmail.com wrote:
I try to create my account again but this user already taken. :(
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Eli Schwartz
19 matches
Mail list logo
