Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] signoffs are dead

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 07:36:49AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Excepted of issues that happen, if upstream decides to make a change of > course, as e.g. gtk or qt did, I couldn't notice more issues as usual. Same here, no more issues than usual, and I even run a bastard version of Arch with my

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] signoffs are dead

Hey there, At some point I started to receive those "signoff" message on one of the list I'm subscribed to. I searched on the wiki what that meant, but with no result. I see that on https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Official_repositories you mention in one sentence what it is, but sorry it's

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] signoffs are dead

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 21:51:17 +0200 Florian Pritz via arch-dev-public wrote: > As pointed out on arch-general (not by me) this makes the whole > signoff process useless. Maybe we should look into finding some > people