u...@net9.ml wrote:
> David Rosenstrauch wrote:
>
> > Anyone know what happened to the "telinit" shortcut? It used to be
> > included in systemd-sysvcompat
> > (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Systemd#systemd-sysvcompat) but
> > seems like it recently got removed. Was it removed
David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> Anyone know what happened to the "telinit" shortcut? It used to be
> included in systemd-sysvcompat
> (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Systemd#systemd-sysvcompat) but
> seems like it recently got removed. Was it removed upstream? (And if
> so, anyone know
ArchLinux devs found a much more convoluted, obfuscated method of starting
the system and setting it up "read to use". Goes with unreadable logs, etc
My recollection was that telinit was a mechanism to tell init to change run
level such as change from run level 3 (to put it crudely - normal
On August 17, 2020 2:53:10 AM UTC, mick howe via arch-general
wrote:
>ArchLinux devs found a much more convoluted, obfuscated method of
>starting
>the system and setting it up "read to use". Goes with unreadable logs,
>etc
I think you mean systemd here, I think the only thing arch linux devs
On 2020-08-16 3:37 pm, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
On 8/16/20 3:24 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On 2020-08-16 3:20 pm, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
Reread the Arch commit. It wasn't removed.
Arch used to move the symlink from the "systemd" package to the
"systemd-sysvcompat"
On 8/16/20 9:30 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> There's no need to be rude. I didn't ignore your email, and I snipped
> it from my response for brevity's sake to spare the list from
> unnecessary sprawl.
There is no ambiguity here. You suggested that this change causes Arch
to deviate from
Arch devs,
Quick AUR question. The virtualbox 5.2 branch is unsupported as of July
2020. Oracle continues to put out testbuilds for 5.2, but currently it does
not build with 5.8 (LTS is fine). I am still awaiting answers on the
vbox-end-users list as to whether anything compatible will be
David Rosenstrauch on Sun, 2020/08/16 14:59:
> On 2020-08-15 2:53 pm, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> > Anyone know what happened to the "telinit" shortcut? It used to be
> > included in systemd-sysvcompat
> > (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Systemd#systemd-sysvcompat) but
> > seems like it
On 2020-08-15 2:53 pm, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Anyone know what happened to the "telinit" shortcut? It used to be
included in systemd-sysvcompat
(https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Systemd#systemd-sysvcompat) but
seems like it recently got removed. Was it removed upstream? (And if
so,
On 8/16/20 3:24 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> On 2020-08-16 3:20 pm, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
>> Reread the Arch commit. It wasn't removed.
>>
>> Arch used to move the symlink from the "systemd" package to the
>> "systemd-sysvcompat" package, and no longer does so.
>
> Not sure I
On 2020-08-16 3:20 pm, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
On 8/16/20 2:59 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On 2020-08-15 2:53 pm, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Anyone know what happened to the "telinit" shortcut? It used to be
included in systemd-sysvcompat
On 2020-08-16 3:06 pm, Andreas Bosch wrote:
Am 16.08.20 um 20:59 schrieb David Rosenstrauch:
On 2020-08-15 2:53 pm, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Anyone know what happened to the "telinit" shortcut? It used to be
included in systemd-sysvcompat
[...]
I looked into this a bit more, and it looks
Am 16.08.20 um 20:59 schrieb David Rosenstrauch:
> On 2020-08-15 2:53 pm, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
>> Anyone know what happened to the "telinit" shortcut? It used to be
>> included in systemd-sysvcompat
>> [...]
>
> I looked into this a bit more, and it looks like this was not an
> upstream
On 8/16/20 2:59 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> On 2020-08-15 2:53 pm, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
>> Anyone know what happened to the "telinit" shortcut? It used to be
>> included in systemd-sysvcompat
>> (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Systemd#systemd-sysvcompat) but
>> seems like it
14 matches
Mail list logo
