Le mardi 12 janvier 2010 à 12:48 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee a écrit :
[...] and its
really tough to go through archives (for example, when googling about an
issue) when there's top-posting involved. That's actually my primary
reason for bottom-posting.
By the way, how do you search in the archives of
solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
Le mardi 12 janvier 2010 à 12:48 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee a écrit :
[...] and its
really tough to go through archives (for example, when googling about an
issue) when there's top-posting involved. That's actually my primary
reason for bottom-posting.
By the way, how do you
On 01/12/2010 07:33 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Dienstag 12 Januar 2010 schrieb Alexander Duscheleit:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:07:19 +0100
Tobias Powalowskit.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Sonntag 10 Januar 2010 schrieb Simon Boulay:
On 01/10/2010 09:48 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Am Samstag 09
On 01/12/2010 11:13 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
Le mardi 12 janvier 2010 à 12:48 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee a écrit :
[...] and its
really tough to go through archives (for example, when googling about an
issue) when there's top-posting involved. That's actually my primary
reason for
Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de writes:
Am Montag 11 Januar 2010 schrieb Chris Brannon:
Is there any reason why building x86_64 packages under
qemu-system-x86_64 would be a bad idea? It is a little slow, but it is
usable. Plus, qemu has a curses interface.
why not using a chroot for this?
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org writes:
It is not a little slow, but painfully slow (remember: the compiler runs
in an emulated environment, where each CPU instruction issued by the
compiler is translated into a CPU instruction that the host CPU
understands, and the result is somehow
The common way is to reply on arch-general, so I will include that
list in CC now.
Thanks for the clarification. So your concern was not about using
external binaries, it was about keeping to use outdated Arch programs.
That's also a very good point when talking about disadvantages of the
rolling
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Simon Boulay simon.bou...@gmail.com wrote:
google e.g. to search for foobar in arch-dev-public:
foobar site:http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/
(42 hits!)
There is also gmane.org:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.arch.devel
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:41:03 +0100
Simon Boulay simon.bou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/12/2010 07:33 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
[snip]
So, again, what is the reason for there being a qemu-kvm package,
when it is apparently a subset of the qemu package?
Greetings,
jinks
The size
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:08:37AM +0100, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
By the way, how do you search in the archives of the archlinux ML ?
especially on several months ?
With Mutt's limit command.
--
Kevin
http://www.RawFedDogs.net
http://www.WacoAgilityGroup.org
Bruceville, TX
What's the
On 12/01/2010 11:03 πμ, Thomas Bächler wrote:
I think what we have now in the kill-klibc branch might actually boot in
a standard setup (no raid, nfs, lvm, encryption), but I didn't try. I'll
keep you posted.
I gave it a try in a VM but it still fails with Failed to execute
/init like last
On 01/12/2010 02:29 PM, Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:41:03 +0100
Simon Boulaysimon.bou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/12/2010 07:33 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
[snip]
So, again, what is the reason for there being a qemu-kvm package,
when it is apparently a subset of the
Am 12.01.2010 15:07, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
On 12/01/2010 11:03 πμ, Thomas Bächler wrote:
I think what we have now in the kill-klibc branch might actually boot in
a standard setup (no raid, nfs, lvm, encryption), but I didn't try. I'll
keep you posted.
I gave it a try in a VM but it
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
Try the params on the /boot/grub/menu.lst line
OK - So I am starting from scratch again since my previous attempt
failed. I boot from the disk. Load modprobe raid1 modules from command
line and then create the RAID1
I was wondering if it would be possible to add a message, saying the
preferred way of running the different user interfaces now is via a
deluge-* script, so deluge-gtk, deluge-web and deluge-console, to the
post_install() of the package?
Damien
On 01/12/2010 04:56 PM, Damien Churchill wrote:
I was wondering if it would be possible to add a message, saying the
preferred way of running the different user interfaces now is via a
deluge-* script, so deluge-gtk, deluge-web and deluge-console, to the
post_install() of the package?
Damien
2010/1/12 Ionut Biru biru.io...@gmail.com:
On 01/12/2010 04:56 PM, Damien Churchill wrote:
I was wondering if it would be possible to add a message, saying the
preferred way of running the different user interfaces now is via a
deluge-* script, so deluge-gtk, deluge-web and deluge-console, to
On 01/12/2010 05:04 PM, Damien Churchill wrote:
2010/1/12 Ionut Birubiru.io...@gmail.com:
On 01/12/2010 04:56 PM, Damien Churchill wrote:
I was wondering if it would be possible to add a message, saying the
preferred way of running the different user interfaces now is via a
deluge-* script,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
Try the params on the /boot/grub/menu.lst line
OK - So I am starting from scratch again since my previous attempt
failed. I boot from the
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:21 AM, dave reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
With mdadm in your initrd, you don't need to specify the parameters of
the array in Grub. Foregoing that, the first parameter passed to the
md option is the type of raid array (e,g, 0, 1, 456) and not the
number of
2010/1/12 Ionut Biru biru.io...@gmail.com:
On 01/12/2010 05:04 PM, Damien Churchill wrote:
2010/1/12 Ionut Birubiru.io...@gmail.com:
On 01/12/2010 04:56 PM, Damien Churchill wrote:
I was wondering if it would be possible to add a message, saying the
preferred way of running the different
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:21 AM, dave reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
With mdadm in your initrd, you don't need to specify the parameters of
the array in Grub. Foregoing that, the first parameter passed to the
md
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 09:48:24 am Carlos Williams wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
Try the params on the /boot/grub/menu.lst line
OK - So I am starting from scratch again since my previous attempt
failed. I boot from the disk. Load
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:58 AM, dave reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
Hrmm, I've followed the wiki [1] a few times and it hasn't steered me
wrong. While it does combine some of the old with the new, it makes
one point fairly clear when messing with Grub:
Nowadays (2009.02), with the mdadm
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 10:21:19 am dave reisner wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
Try the params on the /boot/grub/menu.lst line
OK - So I am starting from
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 10:36:49 am Carlos Williams wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:21 AM, dave reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
With mdadm in your initrd, you don't need to specify the parameters of
the array in Grub. Foregoing that, the first parameter passed to the
md option is
Thanks for everyone's input. It appeared to have failed both ways. I
guess Arch is not in the cards for me. It sucks because I love the
rolling release aspect of Arch. I just find the documentation very
confusing and something as simple as RAID should be far more
simplistic even for a text based
Am Dienstag 12 Januar 2010 schrieb Simon Boulay:
On 01/12/2010 02:29 PM, Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:41:03 +0100
Simon Boulaysimon.bou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/12/2010 07:33 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
[snip]
So, again, what is the reason for there being
On 12-01-10 14:29, Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
[..]
P.S.: As a sidenote: Is it normal/intentional that I don't get my own
mails back via the list? Or is this some weird GMail stuff?
It's a gmail issue.
I'm not sure if there is a setting or something like that, but i've
noticed the same and
On 01/12/2010 06:04 PM, Guus Snijders wrote:
On 12-01-10 14:29, Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
[..]
P.S.: As a sidenote: Is it normal/intentional that I don't get my own
mails back via the list? Or is this some weird GMail stuff?
It's a gmail issue.
I'm not sure if there is a setting or
On 12-01-10 06:27, Loui Chang wrote:
[top posting trimming ]
I think part of the problem is that some email clients like gmail
webmail help persist the bad behaviour. They default with top posting
replies and sending HTML emails. I have requested that they change the
defaults, but haven't
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Guus Snijders gsnijd...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12-01-10 06:27, Loui Chang wrote:
[top posting trimming ]
I think part of the problem is that some email clients like gmail
webmail help persist the bad behaviour. They default with top posting
replies and
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Mauro Santos
registo.maill...@gmail.com wrote:
P.S.: As a sidenote: Is it normal/intentional that I don't get my own
mails back via the list? Or is this some weird GMail stuff?
It's a gmail issue.
I'm not sure if there is a setting or something like that, but
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Mauro Santos
registo.maill...@gmail.com wrote:
P.S.: As a sidenote: Is it normal/intentional that I don't get my own
mails back via the list? Or is this some weird GMail stuff?
It's a gmail
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
I see mine just fine in the Sent folder. I don't think mailman
actually sends a list mail to the original sender, does it?
Either way, they are threaded together when it becomes a conversation
It is apparently a
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for everyone's input. It appeared to have failed both ways. I
guess Arch is not in the cards for me. It sucks because I love the
rolling release aspect of Arch. I just find the documentation very
confusing and
Hi all,
I'm sorry if it has already been discussed here, but I couldn't find
anything with the keywords I was using. I even had a bad time choosing
this message subject.
I bought a new, bigger monitor to use with my notebook. I've already
configured X, but sometimes I like to write on the tty
On Tue 12 Jan 2010 19:28 +0100, Guus Snijders wrote:
On 12-01-10 06:27, Loui Chang wrote:
I think part of the problem is that some email clients like gmail
webmail help persist the bad behaviour. They default with top posting
replies and sending HTML emails. I have requested that they change
On 01/12/10 at 07:57pm, Xavier wrote:
It was set to yes for me, that was probably the default, I don't
remember ever changing that.
I've mine set to yes as well but I still don't get my own posts. Oh well, mutt
to the rescue again:
# cc myself when replying to an ML
# note: with this, you
Am 12.01.2010 15:07, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
On 12/01/2010 11:03 πμ, Thomas Bächler wrote:
I think what we have now in the kill-klibc branch might actually boot in
a standard setup (no raid, nfs, lvm, encryption), but I didn't try. I'll
keep you posted.
I gave it a try in a VM but it
At Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 06:27 Loui Chang wrote:
I also find mutt's 'T' helps. It hides the quoted text.
Very nice feature. Does anyone knows if this is possible in knode too?
See you, Attila
At Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 12:27 Chris Brannon wrote:
Yes, I've noticed that the ./configure step is especially painful,
because of all of the little test programs that it compiles.
Running ./configure for a small project took the good part of half an hour.
Do you use virtio in your vm?
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 12.01.2010 15:07, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
I gave it a try in a VM but it still fails with Failed to execute
/init like last time (http://i.imgur.com/h6xDu.png).
The mkinicpio revision I tried was 54fd032, along
Am 12.01.2010 22:24, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
I tried in VirtualBox on Arch i686 and it worked fine here (meaning I
didn't have that particular problem).
It then paniced due to problems in /init. Rev
93a8be170ff841dd345084b5f5eda66c76e6534f boots fine here on VirtualBox.
I don't know why
On 12/11/2009 01:13 AM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
Hello all
I will be away from now for about two or more weeks. I recently surfered
an small irritation on my eyss, so I can not stay on my PC :( Leaving
the bugtracker in their hands, I hope to be with you again soon.
Best regards.
On 01/13/2010 12:05 AM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
On 12/11/2009 01:13 AM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
Hello all
I will be away from now for about two or more weeks. I recently surfered
an small irritation on my eyss, so I can not stay on my PC :( Leaving
the bugtracker in their hands, I
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 04:28:40PM -0500, Paul Mattal wrote:
On 01/12/2010 04:16 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
As the dcron logging is now managed by syslog-ng, it shouldn't provide
a /etc/logrotate.d/crond. Instead, we should release a new syslog-ng
package with /var/log/crond.log added to the
2010/1/12 Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Guus Snijders gsnijd...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12-01-10 06:27, Loui Chang wrote:
[top posting trimming ]
I think part of the problem is that some email clients like gmail
webmail help persist the bad
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:17 PM, ludovic coues cou...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/1/12 Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Guus Snijders gsnijd...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12-01-10 06:27, Loui Chang wrote:
[top posting trimming ]
I think part of the problem
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Aaron Griffin wrote:
If you modify it, you should add it to the NoUpgrade line in
/etc/pacman.conf. The backup array is for what we INTEND to be
modified. Users are more than welcome to do what we don't intend, but
you need to control whether of not pacman mucks with those
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Aaron Griffin wrote:
If you modify it, you should add it to the NoUpgrade line in
/etc/pacman.conf. The backup array is for what we INTEND to be
modified. Users are more than welcome to do what we
Am 13.01.2010 00:34, schrieb Dimitrios Apostolou:
Since I've been bitten by this, how can I know if the file I modified is
goint to be overwritten or not, *before* it actually happens? And even
if it is, a .pacsave wouldn't hurt anyone, if I remember correctly (it's
been some time) I had
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:34:52AM +0200, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
Since I've been bitten by this, how can I know if the file I
modified is goint to be overwritten or not, *before* it actually
happens?
pacman -Qo $file
will tell you what package installed $file.
find /var/abs
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 13.01.2010 00:34, schrieb Dimitrios Apostolou:
Since I've been bitten by this, how can I know if the file I modified is
goint to be overwritten or not, *before* it actually happens? And even
if it is, a .pacsave
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 21:31, Attila vodoo0...@sonnenkinder.org wrote:
At Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 12:27 Chris Brannon wrote:
Yes, I've noticed that the ./configure step is especially painful,
because of all of the little test programs that it compiles.
Running ./configure for a small
I'm sorry if it has already been discussed here, but I couldn't find
anything with the keywords I was using. I even had a bad time choosing
this message subject.
xrandr ?
I bought a new, bigger monitor to use with my notebook. I've already
configured X, but sometimes I like to write on the
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:50:47PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
pacman -Qii is your friend.
This.
pacman -Qii dcron will show you all the backup files that pacman will
take care of.
Very nice. When did you guys do
It was set to yes for me, that was probably the default, I don't
remember ever changing that.
I've mine set to yes as well but I still don't get my own posts.
afaik Google filters them probably thinking it's a loop or something
--
damjan
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:19:04 -0500
Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for everyone's input. It appeared to have failed both ways. I
guess Arch is not in the cards for me. It sucks because I love the
rolling release aspect of Arch. I just find the documentation very
confusing
On Wednesday 13 January 2010 01:55:40 Patrick Brisbin wrote:
I've mine set to yes as well but I still don't get my own posts. Oh well,
mutt to the rescue again:
# cc myself when replying to an ML
# note: with this, you can't :q! mid-compose to abort
# instead, just :wq and abort from
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:41:47PM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
Very nice. When did you guys do that?
Forever? It is in the initial git import from 2005, which is the
beginnings of pacman 3.X:
http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/src/pacman/package.c?id=d04ba#n85
Just shows: read a
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Jim Pryor
lists+arch-gene...@jimpryor.net wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:41:47PM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
Very nice. When did you guys do that?
Forever? It is in the initial git import from 2005, which is the
beginnings of pacman 3.X:
Excerpts from Alexander Duscheleit's message of Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:11
+0100:
I don't use GMails web interface, i just pull all my mail from there
via IMAP and it's sorted on my local server via sieve/dovecot together
with a bunch of other accounts.
This feature thus destroys threads for me,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Ionut Biru biru.io...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/13/2010 12:05 AM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
On 12/11/2009 01:13 AM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
Hello all
I will be away from now for about two or more weeks. I recently surfered
an small irritation on my
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 21:06 -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Jim Pryor
lists+arch-gene...@jimpryor.net wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:41:47PM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
Very nice. When did you guys do that?
Forever? It is in the initial git import from 2005,
At Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2010 01:43 Damjan Georgievski wrote:
he is not using kvm (and kvm will not make a virtual 64bit cpu on a 32bit
guest)
Thanks for this hint. I thought he is using kvm because the binary has the same
name. This was a mistake of mine.
See you, Attila
66 matches
Mail list logo
