Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-1

2011-03-26 Thread Marek Otahal
On Tuesday 22 of March 2011 01:24:26 Emmanuel Benisty wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Marek Otahal markota...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday 21 of March 2011 22:21:44 you wrote: On Monday 21 of March 2011 22:09:22 Erik Johnson wrote: Touchpad scrolling stopped working for me with this

[arch-general] What happened to Powerpill?

2011-03-26 Thread Marek Otahal
Hi, anyone knows what happened to Xyne's powerpill [1] pacman wrapper? I started using it recently for it's aria2c multithreaded downloads but a couple of days it disappeared from community/aur and there's no trace. Thanks, marek [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Powerpill -- Marek

Re: [arch-general] What happened to Powerpill?

2011-03-26 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 11:28 +0100, Marek Otahal wrote: Hi, anyone knows what happened to Xyne's powerpill [1] pacman wrapper? I started using it recently for it's aria2c multithreaded downloads but a couple of days it disappeared from community/aur and there's no trace. Thanks, marek

Re: [arch-general] What happened to Powerpill?

2011-03-26 Thread cantabile
Le 26/03/2011 12:28, Marek Otahal a écrit : Hi, anyone knows what happened to Xyne's powerpill [1] pacman wrapper? I started using it recently for it's aria2c multithreaded downloads but a couple of days it disappeared from community/aur and there's no trace. Thanks, marek [1]

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-26 Thread Damjan
corresponding kernel bugzilla entries: i915 problems: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27572 ath9k problems: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31452 FYI: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2011-March/009741.html Are the i915 issues fixed with 38.1 from

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-26 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Samstag 26 März 2011 schrieb Damjan: corresponding kernel bugzilla entries: i915 problems: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27572 ath9k problems: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31452 FYI: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2011-March/009741.html

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 26.03.2011 15:58, schrieb Damjan: Are the i915 issues fixed with 38.1 from testing? no, but it seems Chris Wilson has found the issue. I guess 38.2 will have the patch. Are you sure? .38.2 review is already in progress. If you could send us a link to the patch, we could integrate it

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-26 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 26.03.2011 15:58, schrieb Damjan: Are the i915 issues fixed with 38.1 from testing? no, but it seems Chris Wilson has found the issue. I guess 38.2 will have the patch. Are you sure? .38.2 review is already in

[arch-general] New list: arch-projects

2011-03-26 Thread Thomas Bächler
A new list has been created: arch-projects. This list is for development discussion, patches and pull requests for initscripts, netcfg, dbscripts, devtools (and maybe other projects, those are the ones I could think of). Anyone is free to subscribe, but please, no user discussions (keep those to

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.38-2

2011-03-26 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am Samstag 26 März 2011 schrieb Evangelos Foutras: On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Am 26.03.2011 15:58, schrieb Damjan: Are the i915 issues fixed with 38.1 from testing? no, but it seems Chris Wilson has found the issue. I guess 38.2 will

Re: [arch-general] bluez and udev

2011-03-26 Thread Seblu
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote: # Run helper every time a Bluetooth device appears # On remove actions, bluetoothd should go away by itself ACTION==add|change, SUBSYSTEM==bluetooth,

[arch-general] inefficient handling of bug reports?

2011-03-26 Thread Angus
When I file a bug report with the Flyspray web interface, why can't I specify the package it concerns? Having that option should make it possible for the package maintainers to be immediately and automatically notified of the report. The way it works now seems to be that I have to wait for some