[arch-general] [signoff] ipw2200-fw-1.3-7 and ipw2100-fw-3.1-5

2012-04-19 Thread Tom Gundersen
Hi guys, These packages have been in testing for some time without any signoffs, so signoffs from users as well as devs would be appreciated. The only change should be that the firmware has moved from /lib/firmware to /usr/lib/firmware. Cheers, Tom

Re: [arch-general] ASLR and PIE wider adoption.

2012-04-19 Thread Kant
Impossible to implement without patching toolchain defaults (Never going to happen) or wrapping the compiler. Fedora/Ubuntu handle it on a per-package basis.

Re: [arch-general] KRunner crashes

2012-04-19 Thread Jayesh Badwaik
On Thursday 19 Apr 2012 14:56:31 Maciej Sitarz wrote: > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/29467 > > Best regards I saw this post before but did not save it. I searched for it later while posting my answer, but could not find it neither on google nor anywhere else. Thanks -- Jayesh Badwaik

Re: [arch-general] KRunner crashes

2012-04-19 Thread Maciej Sitarz
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/29467 Best regards -- Maciej Sitarz

Re: [arch-general] Cannot boot since latest -Syu

2012-04-19 Thread Jérôme M. Berger
Norbert Zeh wrote: > "Jérôme M. Berger" [2012.04.19 0757 +0200]: >> Same again, since the latest -Syu the "normal" image fails to mount >> my RAID arrays but the "fallback" image works. This is even with >> "raid456" in MODULES... > > This is just a shot in the dark, but which MODULES line ar

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-19 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM Tom Gundersen wrote: > [...] > > I adopted this with the intention of killing it. Let me know if there are > objections. > > As far as I'm concerned the replacement can stay in community, but if > anyone feel otherwise I'd be ok with moving and adopting it. Is

Re: [arch-general] KRunner crashes

2012-04-19 Thread Paul Gideon Dann
On Thursday 19 Apr 2012 19:35:31 Jayesh Badwaik wrote: > Downgrade qt to fix it for now. Seems to be a problem due to a bug from > gcc-4.7 probably. > > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/29517 Thanks; that's done the trick for now. Paul

Re: [arch-general] KRunner crashes

2012-04-19 Thread Jayesh Badwaik
On Thursday 19 Apr 2012 13:44:35 Paul Gideon Dann wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Has anyone else been experiencing krunner and screen locker crashes these > last few days in KDE? > > Paul Downgrade qt to fix it for now. Seems to be a problem due to a bug from gcc-4.7 probably. https://bugs.archlinux.o

Re: [arch-general] Cannot boot since latest -Syu

2012-04-19 Thread Norbert Zeh
"Jérôme M. Berger" [2012.04.19 0757 +0200]: > Same again, since the latest -Syu the "normal" image fails to mount > my RAID arrays but the "fallback" image works. This is even with > "raid456" in MODULES... This is just a shot in the dark, but which MODULES line are you referring to, the one

Re: [arch-general] KRunner crashes

2012-04-19 Thread atilla ontas
19 Nisan 2012 15:44 tarihinde Paul Gideon Dann yazdı: > Hi Guys, > > Has anyone else been experiencing krunner and screen locker crashes these last > few days in KDE? > > Paul I didn't catch which it is but i' m getting "commandline" tool crash report every KDE startup since few days; i guess it

[arch-general] KRunner crashes

2012-04-19 Thread Paul Gideon Dann
Hi Guys, Has anyone else been experiencing krunner and screen locker crashes these last few days in KDE? Paul

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-19 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:23:40 +0200 schrieb Seblu : > Currently i removed the last kernel version dot in linux-tools to > avoid user confusion between stable kernel number and linux-tools > version. I manually check if stable release embed fix for cpupower and > perf to avoid user to update when no

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-19 Thread Seblu
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 19.04.2012 01:21, schrieb Seblu: >>> As far as I'm concerned the replacement can stay in community, but if >>> anyone feel otherwise I'd be ok with moving and adopting it. >> >> If you move linux-tools source package into core/extra it m

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] cpufrequtils in [core]

2012-04-19 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 19.04.2012 01:21, schrieb Seblu: >> As far as I'm concerned the replacement can stay in community, but if >> anyone feel otherwise I'd be ok with moving and adopting it. > > If you move linux-tools source package into core/extra it make sense > to merge it with linux package. This would force