Dnia Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:45:18 -0600
"D. R. Evans" napisał(a):
[...]
> That doesn't look right. Surely it should say ...computer-modern-n7dr...
> shouldn't it? I don't know how the name is generated (presumably that's part
> of mkfontscale?) but it looks to me like the generated name is invalid.
On 25-04-12 16:03, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Greetings,
[init, systemd]
As an alternative to the One Process For Everything I'd like to ask
you to evalute OpenRC as an init system for Arch Linux.
Possibly a stupid idea and probably OT, but i was just thinking; as
systemd appears to take off mo
Sławomir Szczyrba said the following at 04/25/2012 02:14 PM :
>
> What says fc-list?
>
I'll spare you the entire output (unless you really want it). It includes
these lines:
Courier New
N7DR:style=Regular,Normal,obyčejné,Standard,Κανονικά,Normaali,Normál,Normale,Standaard,Normalny,Обычный,Norm
When I first saw the topic, I thought "yet another systemd-like piece
of crap?" Then I read that this is from Gentoo and the rest of the
original post and I think it could be nice and I could even switch to
it one day. But do you actually need to bother with runlevels or is
it like arch (everythi
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:56:47 +0800
Bill Sun wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:35:46PM -0500, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> > Assuming you are running a desktop machine, why would you want to DROP by
> > default all outgoing traffic? AFAICT google voice app makes you browser
> > establish some UDP conne
On 04/25/2012 10:25 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> While dependencies (done in the right way) might have been nice to
> have, I don't see this as a major shortcoming of our current system,
> and if we are to change away from initscripts the replacement would
> have to provide significantly better benef
On Apr 25, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote:
> The problem I have with a systemd like init system is that it's way too
> much overkill for a server. I like our current situation as we have an
> extremely simple init system and users can drop in systemd if they so
> choose. --Kaiting.
>
I c
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> About modules and bloat - for systemd you're going from a few hundred
> lines of shell to a few hundred thousand lines of mandatory
> dependencies.
I have no idea where you get these numbers from, or why they should matter.
> but at the cos
The 25/04/12, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> >I like our current situation as we have an
> >extremely simple init system and users can drop in systemd if they so
> >choose.
I like our current situation as we have an
extremely simple init system an
Hi,
The 25/04/12, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> As an alternative to the One Process For Everything I'd like to ask you to
> evalute OpenRC as an init system for Arch Linux.
<...>
> While Gentoo is by far the largest user it's definitely not the only one
> - there are the direct derivatives (Sabayon,
10 matches
Mail list logo
