Re: [arch-general] NAS drive revisited

2012-05-20 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Mon, 21 May 2012 00:11:38 -0300 Martin Cigorraga wrote: > Hi Nikolic, > If you don't plan to share your NAS with (nasty and mediocre) Windows > systems you should mount it as a NFS4 share, I use it to access my > download and media home servers from various PCs in my home and it's > quite a sm

Re: [arch-general] NAS drive revisited

2012-05-20 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Mon, 21 May 2012 01:20:21 +0200 Damjan wrote: > > I have read the Arch Wiki till i am blue in the face already hence > > the mail .. > > > > > > mounting with SMB using the line below > > > > mount -t cifs //192.168.0.154/backups -o /home/pete/nas/ > > > > After entering the password it moun

Re: [arch-general] rubygems, the arch way and the aur

2012-05-20 Thread martin kalcher
Here [0] it is! The very very first version of archgems. It creates/updates an arch repo with some help from the rubygems API. You can put a list of gems in a config a it will populate your repo with all deps. The first few tests worked quite well, but there are some issues like the missing

Re: [arch-general] NAS drive revisited

2012-05-20 Thread Martin Cigorraga
Hi Nikolic, If you don't plan to share your NAS with (nasty and mediocre) Windows systems you should mount it as a NFS4 share, I use it to access my download and media home servers from various PCs in my home and it's quite a smooth experience.

Re: [arch-general] rubygems, the arch way and the aur

2012-05-20 Thread martin kalcher
Am 20.05.2012 13:39, schrieb Allan McRae: On 20/05/12 21:27, Kwpolska wrote: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 3:58 AM, martin kalcher wrote: Hmm.. i will figure out what makepkg actually needs to build the gem packages. Does it call pacman, when i call it with -d? This would a problem in my case. -d

Re: [arch-general] NAS drive revisited

2012-05-20 Thread Damjan
I have read the Arch Wiki till i am blue in the face already hence the mail .. mounting with SMB using the line below mount -t cifs //192.168.0.154/backups -o /home/pete/nas/ After entering the password it mounts . mount reports .. //192.168.0.154/backups on /home/pete/nas type cifs (rw,rel

Re: [arch-general] NAS drive revisited

2012-05-20 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Sun, 20 May 2012 23:17:14 +0200 Damjan wrote: > > > I am still not able to write to my external NAS drive an iomega home > > media drive > > > > So lets approach it from a different angle > > > > we will say i have not done anything yet just plugged it into the > > network > > > > What packag

Re: [arch-general] NAS drive revisited

2012-05-20 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Sun, 20 May 2012 18:09:13 -0400 Loui Chang wrote: > On Sun 20 May 2012 21:58 +0100, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > > I am still not able to write to my external NAS drive an iomega home > > media drive > > You just can't write? If you can mount but can't write, then you have > the wrong permissions on t

Re: [arch-general] NAS drive revisited

2012-05-20 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun 20 May 2012 21:58 +0100, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > I am still not able to write to my external NAS drive an iomega home > media drive You just can't write? If you can mount but can't write, then you have the wrong permissions on the drive and/or uid/gid mixups, depending on how you want it set up

Re: [arch-general] NAS drive revisited

2012-05-20 Thread Damjan
I am still not able to write to my external NAS drive an iomega home media drive So lets approach it from a different angle we will say i have not done anything yet just plugged it into the network What packages am i looking to install and what configuration changes do i need to make . I a

[arch-general] NAS drive revisited

2012-05-20 Thread P .NIKOLIC
Hi .. I am still not able to write to my external NAS drive an iomega home media drive So lets approach it from a different angle we will say i have not done anything yet just plugged it into the network What packages am i looking to install and what configuration changes do i need to make

Re: [arch-general] pm-suspend stuck at uhci_hcd

2012-05-20 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Sun, 20 May 2012 12:36:16 +0200 Manne Merak wrote: > On 05/17/2012 01:11 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote: > > On Wed, 16 May 2012 23:50:06 +0200 > > Manne Merak wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> Couple of updates ago suspend to RAM stopped working. > >> Looking at the pm-suspend.log (below) file shows that it

Re: [arch-general] rubygems, the arch way and the aur

2012-05-20 Thread Kwpolska
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 20/05/12 21:27, Kwpolska wrote: >> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 3:58 AM, martin kalcher >> wrote: >>> Hmm.. i will figure out what makepkg actually needs to build the gem >>> packages. Does it call pacman, when i call it with -d? This would a pr

Re: [arch-general] rubygems, the arch way and the aur

2012-05-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 20/05/12 21:27, Kwpolska wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 3:58 AM, martin kalcher > wrote: >> Hmm.. i will figure out what makepkg actually needs to build the gem >> packages. Does it call pacman, when i call it with -d? This would a problem >> in my case. > > -d DOES call pacman, WRONG. >

Re: [arch-general] rubygems, the arch way and the aur

2012-05-20 Thread Kwpolska
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 3:58 AM, martin kalcher wrote: > Hmm.. i will figure out what makepkg actually needs to build the gem > packages. Does it call pacman, when i call it with -d? This would a problem > in my case. -d DOES call pacman, but you can modify makepkg in order to (a) not do so; (b)

Re: [arch-general] pm-suspend stuck at uhci_hcd

2012-05-20 Thread Manne Merak
On 05/17/2012 01:11 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote: On Wed, 16 May 2012 23:50:06 +0200 Manne Merak wrote: Hi, Couple of updates ago suspend to RAM stopped working. Looking at the pm-suspend.log (below) file shows that it gets stuck at unloading uhci_hcd? I can unload and load the module by hand just f