Re: [arch-general] GTK2 GUIs became a PITA after upgrade

2016-04-10 Thread Andrew Ridgway
There have been a few bugs reported about the gtk 3.20 theming issues[1] and in those bugs it mentions that there is a fix upstream that we just have to wait until it trickles down[2] It seems that 3.20 requires themes to update something (not sure what) and this is the problem Get on to the

Re: [arch-general] GTK2 GUIs became a PITA after upgrade

2016-04-10 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Ralf Mardorf writes: > after the last upgrade GTK2 apps running in an openbox session need more > space, they became darker and in some windows even the fonts became > less good readable. The reason that I dropped desktop environments was > to get rid of chaotic designs

Re: [arch-general] GTK2 GUIs became a PITA after upgrade

2016-04-10 Thread Stephen
window, became a bar > with a cutting line inside the bar: > > http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160410/7fdca7e7/attachment-0001.png > > The list of packages that were upgraded is posted here: > > http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/2016-April

[arch-general] GTK2 GUIs became a PITA after upgrade

2016-04-10 Thread Ralf Mardorf
inside a window, became a bar with a cutting line inside the bar: http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160410/7fdca7e7/attachment-0001.png The list of packages that were upgraded is posted here: http://lists.claws-mail.org/pipermail/users/2016-April/016236.html [rocketmouse

Re: [arch-general] wireless driver broadcom b43 random success or failure

2016-04-10 Thread Mauro Santos
On 10-04-2016 18:27, Kenneth Jensen wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:50:44 -0500, Doug Newgard wrote: >>> >>> Second, what is /etc/modules? > This literally takes less than a minute to google. > According to https://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-modules.html : > "If some modules are not

Re: [arch-general] wireless driver broadcom b43 random success or failure

2016-04-10 Thread Tinu Weber
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:50:44 -0500, Doug Newgard wrote: > On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:44:07 +0200 > Dieter Wirz wrote: > > > sudo echo b43 >> /etc/modules > > First, don't top post. > > Second, what is /etc/modules? Third, the >> redirection happens as a regular user,

Re: [arch-general] wireless driver broadcom b43 random success or failure

2016-04-10 Thread Doug Newgard
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:44:07 +0200 Dieter Wirz wrote: > sudo echo b43 >> /etc/modules First, don't top post. Second, what is /etc/modules?

Re: [arch-general] wireless driver broadcom b43 random success or failure

2016-04-10 Thread Dieter Wirz
sudo echo b43 >> /etc/modules On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 5:17 PM, message wrote: > Readers, > > Can anyone explain if the following 'dmesg' outputs are useful to understand > why after start of X session, the wireless driver fails sometimes? The > wireless driver does not

[arch-general] SSL/TLS still seems to be screwed up (retrieving Mail with Thunderbird)

2016-04-10 Thread Elmar Stellnberger
While being connected via an insecure VPN I had once more left my email client open by accident (Thunderbird). Though access to imap.gmail.com shall be secured by SSL/TLS my gmail password was malversated within a few seconds; i.e. I got a login attempt from HongKong and had to change the

Re: [arch-general] Emacs is missing the icons in toolbar since one of the last updates

2016-04-10 Thread Doug Newgard
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:24:08 +0200 Dan Örjestad wrote: > I seem to have a related problem with gtk3-demo. I'm not entirely > certain, but I think there's a missing divider after the selection list > on the left, and the actual demo. I also get this odd behaviour in >

Re: [arch-general] Emacs is missing the icons in toolbar since one of the last updates

2016-04-10 Thread Dan Örjestad
I seem to have a related problem with gtk3-demo. I'm not entirely certain, but I think there's a missing divider after the selection list on the left, and the actual demo. I also get this odd behaviour in Emacs, where the toolbar(?) is completely condensed. In gtk3-demo the tab-bar also seems to

Re: [arch-general] Emacs is missing the icons in toolbar since one of the last updates

2016-04-10 Thread Manuel Reimer
On 04/10/2016 04:24 PM, Ondřej Kučera wrote: it's already been reported: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/48862. The same happens to me but I have the toolbar disabled in my configuration anyway, so I don't really care much. Thanks for verifying. I'll try to downgrade a few things that could

[arch-general] Since last update (yesterday) Gnome switches me to VT1 after some time

2016-04-10 Thread Manuel Reimer
Hello, I hope someone can reproduce this one and can point me to some bug report. I'm using the closed source Nvidia driver and a default Gnome installation. Since the last update, the following happens: Usually Gnome runs two X servers. One on ":0" and one on ":1". The last one is the one,

Re: [arch-general] Emacs is missing the icons in toolbar since one of the last updates

2016-04-10 Thread Jens Adam
Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:15:15 +0200 Manuel Reimer : > is this a known bug or do only I have this issue? You might want to watch https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/48862 --byte pgpwFgAtJBZoL.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

Re: [arch-general] Emacs is missing the icons in toolbar since one of the last updates

2016-04-10 Thread Ondřej Kučera
Hi, it's already been reported: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/48862. The same happens to me but I have the toolbar disabled in my configuration anyway, so I don't really care much. Ondra On 10.4.2016 16:15, Manuel Reimer wrote: Hello, is this a known bug or do only I have this issue?

[arch-general] Emacs is missing the icons in toolbar since one of the last updates

2016-04-10 Thread Manuel Reimer
Hello, is this a known bug or do only I have this issue? Since the last system update, I no longer have any icons in emacs. The toolbar is just empty. Thanks in advance. Manuel

Re: [arch-general] LLVM update blocker?

2016-04-10 Thread Yichao Yu
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 04/09/2016 07:26 PM, Yichao Yu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to ask if there's anything that is holding back upgrading the >> LLVM package to 3.8.0. (The package is already flaged out-of-date and >> I don't think this