Re: [arch-general] Arch install broken by invalid signatures (anthraxx) using 201610 iso

On 01/08/2017 01:19 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > The key probably expired... Just do "pacman-key --refresh-keys" on the > install media. > > A Roger WILCO, Thanks A :) -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

Re: [arch-general] Arch install broken by invalid signatures (anthraxx) using 201610 iso

On 08/01/17 17:11, David C. Rankin wrote: > All, > > Attempting an arch install tonight, and I get the following at pacstrap /mnt > What was this caused by? I had to boot from the 10/2016 iso. Is it a change > in signatures since then? I'll download a new iso and try, but I'd be >

[arch-general] Arch install broken by invalid signatures (anthraxx) using 201610 iso

All, Attempting an arch install tonight, and I get the following at pacstrap /mnt :: Proceed with installation? [Y/n] :: Retrieving packages... krb5-1.13.7-1-x86_64 1100.1 KiB 1405K/s 00:01 [##] 100% libpsl-0.16.1-1-x86_64

Re: [arch-general] Gufw broken by large update.

I did: sudo cp /usr/bin/gufw-pkexec /usr/bin/gufw-pkexec.old Then sudo nano /usr/bin/gufw-pkexec and edited it from: . . . "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/gufw/gufw.py" "/usr/lib/python3.5/dist-packages/gufw/gufw.py" . . . to: . . . "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/gufw/gufw.py"

Re: [arch-general] Gufw broken by large update.

On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 12:03 +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 01/07/17 at 02:36am, Phil Wyett via arch-general wrote: > > Workaround... > > > > In terminal: > > > > sudo python /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/gufw/gufw.py > > This generates a new pyc file, so beware of conflicts when

Re: [arch-general] Gufw broken by large update.

On 01/07/17 at 02:36am, Phil Wyett via arch-general wrote: > Workaround... > > In terminal: > > sudo python /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/gufw/gufw.py This generates a new pyc file, so beware of conflicts when updating to a new gufw package. You will have to use the --force :) -- Jelle van