>
> CVE / ASA logging or however you call it is now officially hosted on
> https://security.archlinux.org
>
> The wiki is dead, long live the new awesome tracker :)
>
I will archive the old wiki articles in about a week. Get your arguments in
now if you want them to stick around.
Oops, I forgot ...
Good luck!
I hope you get rid of the "full panic mode", since its a counterproductive
mode. A bug reported a long time ago to upstream, but upstream seems to be
dead. OTOH perhaps upstream is still alive, but doesn't care about bug reports
from atheists. If so, an agnostic
Hi Ray,
first I experienced issues with Ardour 5, but when using it again, everything I
used worked without issues. I didn't use export and apart from this, I anyway
build jack2 from git, so when using jack2, it still might require to build
jack2 from git, regarding a freewheel issue. I don't
Hey Ray,
On 2017-01-17 23:39:10 (+0600), Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> Ralf, David
>
> Thanks guys for all the info you have been sharing, I got sloppy again
> and went into full panic mode in preparation for my master's thesis
> and subsequent defense (19th).
Good luck!
Thumbs pressed!!
> I
On 11 January 2017 at 15:42, David Runge wrote:
> ...
> Would it be possible to push Ardour 5.5 now?
> There's plenty of help and updates in the rest of this mail thread.
> We're nearly a year behind by now.
> Arch used to be bleeding edge...
> ...
Ralf, David
Thanks guys for
Heyo,
On 2017-01-17 17:19:34 (+0100), Damjan Georgievski via arch-general wrote:
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/52406
thanks!
Will keep uwsgi in the "to watch" box for a while then... ;-)
>
> the packager is a bit irresponsible
Best,
David
--
https://sleepmap.de
signature.asc
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/52406
the packager is a bit irresponsible
On 17 January 2017 at 17:14, David Runge wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> ran into the issue, that after updating from uwsgi 2.0.14-1 to uwsgi
> 2.0.14-5 (php plugin of the same version), all php based webapps make
Hey all,
ran into the issue, that after updating from uwsgi 2.0.14-1 to uwsgi
2.0.14-5 (php plugin of the same version), all php based webapps make
uwsgi segfault (tested with wordpress and stikked)!
Something like the below will happen (including after reboot):
Jan 17 16:24:20 frqrec
I am planning for today to finish a fresh Arch installation (trying out
Arch again after a few years. I have 'always' been using Ubuntu)
Reading this I wonder whether I should install X11 or Wayland
Leo Noordhuizen - Eindhoven - The Netherlands
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 at 13:25 Andres Fernandez <
El 17 ene. 2017 9:10 AM, "Mathieu Clabaut" escribió:
Gnome on Wayland was very unstable here. Switching back to gnome on X11
solved the problem. No more crash since.
I have an unstable session on both X11 and Wayland since libharfbuzz was
updated. I'm not saying that it is
Gnome on Wayland was very unstable here. Switching back to gnome on X11
solved the problem. No more crash since.
Le mar. 17 janv. 2017 à 11:42, Óscar García Amor a
écrit :
> Have you installed infinality fonts? They have incompatibility
> with harfbuzz and broke several
Have you installed infinality fonts? They have incompatibility
with harfbuzz and broke several packages.
See here https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Infinality the banner and
here https://gist.github.com/cryzed/e002e7057435f02cc7894b9e748c5671
Greetings.
2017-01-17 11:14 GMT+01:00 Tom Zander
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:35:42 +0100
From: LoneVVolf
>>No one has tested LI2 interlude with a version past 1.5.0, but that
doesn't mean it will fail with later versions .
>> Just try running it with latest wine, there's a big chance it will work.
No one has tested, because game fail to start
On Sunday, 15 January 2017 19:41:22 CET Frank Zimmermann wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> since yesterday my Gnome Shell crashes at start with the following
> message in the log:
> gnome-session-f[1207]: segfault at 0 ip 7f01adab3cc9 sp
> 7ffd261ce930 error 4 in
On 01/16/17 at 10:57pm, G. Schlisio wrote:
> > Logging was moved to a dedicated subdomain [0], but it is still under
> > development (the source code is on GitHub [1]). Apparently they forgot to
> > mention it (I got the info from the arch-audit [2] repo, here [3]).
>
> very interesting, thank
On 01/17/17 at 09:42am, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> What is the current intended way to sign packages on the pkgbuild.com server?
>
> I spent the past day setting up agent forwarding
> (https://wiki.gnupg.org/AgentForwarding) for it. Had a lot of trouble
> setting it up due to systemd being
16 matches
Mail list logo