Re: [arch-general] sysdig downgraded without adding a new era?

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > Have you ever considered to make use of professional psychological help? > Nearly each of your replies, whomsoever you answer, has got a > condescending tone. It's funny for the reader, if you make a fool of >

Re: [arch-general] sysdig downgraded without adding a new era?

On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:03:36 -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: >On 04/24/2017 08:41 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> downgrades happen from time to time. > >When they do, it is a bug. Why on earth do you think epoch exists >anyway? They might happen unintended, but all downgrades from

Re: [arch-general] sysdig downgraded without adding a new era?

On 04/24/2017 08:41 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > downgrades happen from time to time. When they do, it is a bug. Why on earth do you think epoch exists anyway? Note: custom packages are tangential to this thread, please vent elsewhere. -- Eli Schwartz signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [arch-general] sysdig downgraded without adding a new era?

On 04/24/2017 08:06 PM, Neven Sajko via arch-general wrote: > Anybody else got a "warning: sysdig: local (0.15.1-1) is newer than > community (0.15.0-2)" ? File a bugreport, the version in staging/testing (which was part of the openssl 1.1 rebuild) was older than the new version which was pushed

Re: [arch-general] sysdig downgraded without adding a new era?

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 02:06:59 +0200, Neven Sajko via arch-general wrote: >Anybody else got a "warning: sysdig: local (0.15.1-1) is newer than >community (0.15.0-2)" ? Hi, downgrades happen from time to time. From official repositories I manually downgraded [2017-04-25 01:22] [ALPM] downgraded

[arch-general] sysdig downgraded without adding a new era?

Anybody else got a "warning: sysdig: local (0.15.1-1) is newer than community (0.15.0-2)" ?