On 18/10/2020 17:29, LuKaRo wrote:
> On 7/22/20 9:18 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general wrote:
>> Em julho 22, 2020 14:31 LuKaRo escreveu:
>>> Thanks for clarifying :) Does that mean that gitlab.archlinux.org is
>>> meant to replace git.archlinux.org in the long run, and GitHub will
>>> be
On 05/05/2020 17:42, C Schu via arch-general wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I use mothly update repo:
>
> Server=https://archive.archlinux.org/repos/month/$repo/os/$arch
>
> For years it works without problem but now it doesnt work ?!
Given your limited information, I assume you mean
On 04/04/2020 12:11, Pascal via arch-general wrote:
> I don't quite understand where the reproducibility is broken ?
multi-threaded compression does not create a predictable reproducible
archive (for xz/zstd).
> Amin Vakil says that rebuilding his initrd (when updating kernel and/or
> modules)
On 02/24/20 at 03:31pm, Marco via arch-general wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I run into the problem of outdated package "animate" contained in
> texlive-latexextra. With the current version of the package, xelatex
> is not able to embed animations at least when using png frames. At the
> contrary,
ckagers might be busy, have limited time or various
rebuilds need to happen. For samba for example there is an updated
version in [testing]. For libelf, a rebuild is required which might make
sense to wait until binutils has support for debuginfod so we don't have
to rebuild it twice. [1]
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/65406
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 01/20/20 at 06:54pm, Damjan Georgievski via arch-general wrote:
> I've already opened a bug issue, and supplied a patch at
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/65006
> but except from the first comment by dreisner, there's not much activity.
>
> Is it ok if I escalate here? :)
>
> Alternatively,
On 08/14/19 at 03:40pm, Jack Wu wrote:
> Well why not connect the channel with the group on Telegram by using a
> bot? It will be nice.
This is against the channel ToS, we do not allow anyone to bridge the
channel to an external service. One of the most obvious reasons is that
everything via the
On 08/04/19 at 03:28pm, adérito wrote:
> Hello you can help me to install talkingarch send me the commands to install
> talkingarch.
This is the 4th time you emailed the same message, please refrain from
bumping your topic every day.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Descriptio
ing patches. Since there is
also a bug open for your issue, please leave the discussion there :)
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 03/16/19 at 10:59pm, Jonathon Fernyhough wrote:
> On 16/03/2019 13:24, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> > suggest replacing xz with lzip as xz has quite a few flaws in its file
> > format.
>
> I seem to remember that this has been debunked/ruled out as irrelevant
> to package distribution every time
On 01/01/19 at 04:46pm, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 15:49:36 +0100
> Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>
> > I would recommend our wiki article [1]. Do you have ipv4 forwarding
> > enabled and configured your firwewall correctly?
>
> Forwarding is enable
On 01/01/19 at 03:41pm, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
> had someone run wireguard?`I have read today about it and try to run
> it through the Tutorial
Yes
>
> https://emanuelduss.ch/2018/09/wireguard-vpn-road-warrior-setup/
I would recommend our wiki article [1]. Do you have ipv4
ve to
maintain your own kernel then. Also kpatch is really geared to updating
your kernel for security issues and not updating to a newer version. [1]
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Kernel_live_patching
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
You can also search for past
> > presentations
> > by devs/tus. I would ask their permission though, before using any of
> > their slides
> > templates.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Giancarlo Razzolini
>
> Yes. Here[1] are the slides. I've pinged jelle at the IRC s
md in ArchLinux packaged correctly?
Well it might be an upstream bug, since the man page is installed but
the binary.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t/?country=DE=https_version=4_mirror_status=on
> >
> >
> > I get a list with all mirrors at the moment and not just the ones where
> > the above parameters apply.
>
> Known issue.
>
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/58304
And the fix is deployed on https://archlin
ki but none of
> them seem to properly solve the problem for me.
Check the logs
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t; >
> > I wonder, Is it really important to have that split?
> > --
> > Sudarshan Kakoty <skakoty1...@yahoo.com>
> >
>
> simply saying.
> community is TU managed repo; mostly from AUR by vote.
To be clear, votes don't matter for a package to be moved to
[c
opinion based on experience, the arch admins/devs will know why
> bugzilla is the right choice. I trust them.
Please don't de-rail the thread. (Obviously the Arch devs also want a
performing bugtracker, but Flyspray has to go either way)
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
/gcc?view=revision=258061
As I suggested, create a bugtracker issue for gcc on our bugtracker
otherwise you'll have to wait on a new gcc minor release.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 03/13/18 at 03:17pm, PkmX via arch-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AFAIK this is the exact case of gcc bugzilla #84607:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84607
>
> As this is an upstream bug this should affect all distributions, maybe
> the commenter on Debian is using 7.3.1 so he
On 02/06/18 at 09:18pm, freq via arch-general wrote:
> Shown here for ARM: https://archlinuxarm.org/packages "Showing 1 to 500 of
> 33,249 entries" at the bottom of the page.
> And for Official: "9922 matching packages found. Page 1 of 100." at the
> bottom of
ng
> propagated to the mirrors.
Packagers aren't required to subscribe to arch-general, so it's best to
create a bugreport for this issue.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
sponsored) infrastructure without relying on third party's. This has a
lot of benefits, we own the data, we can migrate freely to an
alternative and we don't rely on externals messing things up or changing
their offering.
A sponsored hosted platform sounds amazing, but having a
vendor lock in isn't really :-)
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
while, most of my releases address community issues).
A Tu can't access [extra] btw.
> Also, I'd like to have an audio mailing list (wether official or not)
> for discussion on that audio packages.
You're free to setup one or extend the wiki :-)
I would advice you both to find a TU to sponsor you!
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
owatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20171009
> >
> > Since I can not offer any money or time to assist you at this time, thank
> > you for keeping 32 bit alive.
>
> The news item dated Jan. 25, 2017 may be of interest to you.
Please take a look at https://archlinux32.org/
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
; issue packages) and I believe you can actually enable the
community repo on it.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Please report this on the bug tracker if not already done.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
nd it to this Arch mailinglist.
It has been updated.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
your personal grudges
with whomever to yourself.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t some adoption, I suggest you upload a PKGBUILD to the
AUR.
P.S. I'm not a 100% fan of these forms of advertisement (seeing how it's
also CC'd to the ubuntu mailing list)
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
em to miss the point that provided on the ISO != installed
on your machine. I for one, don't see a problem with networkmanager
being installed on the ISO, nmtui works pretty well (as does nmcli), I'm
not sure however how much the ISO size will blow up.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 06/13/17 at 04:31pm, Maykel Franco via arch-general wrote:
> 2017-06-13 16:26 GMT+02:00 Jelle van der Waa <je...@vdwaa.nl>:
> > On 06/13/17 at 04:21pm, Maykel Franco via arch-general wrote:
> >> Hi, recently I like install slack-desktop 2.3.4 because with the
> >
the above package for this upgrade? [y/N]
> error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
> :: slack-desktop: requires apt
> :: slack-desktop: requires gir1.2-gnomekeyring-1.0
>
>
> How resolved it?
It's better to not rely on unofficial (shit) like debtap and work on
fixing the package in the repos.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
h Gitlab/Github could be
> possible. That would be cool.
What kind of integration are you looking for?
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
.
Just FYI, we hope to provide an official Arch Linux docker image soon
(tm)
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ing openssl-1.0 it works again.
>
> I see 2 solutions here. Update arch-audit to use OpenSSL 1.1 or add
> openssl-1.0 as a dependency to arch-audit package.
For these issues we have a bugtracker on https://bugs.archlinux.org
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
UR, but if I can help, I will. Storm
> --
You can start by going through the bugtracker, there are plenty of bugs
which need to be triaged, reported upstream or potential fixes in
packaging which in the form of patches can be created and attached to a
bug.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ext to the original mail it's confusing and silly.
And again don't file bug reports for out of date packages..
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ated a lot slower since
we have a lot of big invasive rebuilds; OpenSSL 1.1, LLVM 4.0.
Especially the OpenSSL rebuild was painful and time consuming.
[1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21090
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 03/09/17 at 08:23am, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
>
> So, I wonder why Firefox is in a "preferred" registry (extra), while Opera
> is in "community" and Vivaldi is in "aur".
Well it's not even Open Source software, so why would someone be happy with a
blob.
am firefox now, do you have other reasons to leave out
> alsa support ?
No, we follow software defaults which libraries or CFLAGS we use has
nothing to do with that.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
taken serious atleast
reply in a thread and provide actual facts and arguments.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
the paste expired.. I'd recommend using a sane pastebin such as
gists.github.com, https://ptpb.pw or https://bpaste.net
And are you compiling sparkleshare or using a blob?
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
s-security/2017/01/24/4
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 01/31/17 at 03:06pm, David Runge wrote:
> On 2017-01-30 21:11:18 (+0100), Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > You could make a bug report on our tracker under the community section
> Just did: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/52791
Thanks, assigned so that sergej knows about it :)
--
J
ldn't it be better to switch to nextcloud in the community repository at
> this point?
You could make a bug report on our tracker under the community section
:)
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 01/26/17 at 10:04am, Jeffrey Walton via arch-general wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Does Arch make machines available for testing software? (I'm
> interested in something like the GCC compile farm)
No we don't, we do encourage you to install Arch Linux on all your
machines :)
--
J
very interesting, thank you, simon.
> a deprecation notice on the wiki page will surely be appropriate at some
> time. i'm sure they have a plan
CVE / ASA logging or however you call it is now officially hosted on
https://security.archlinux.org
The wiki is dead, long live the new awesome tra
xz's back to my local
machine and call communitypkg.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 01/07/17 at 02:36am, Phil Wyett via arch-general wrote:
> Workaround...
>
> In terminal:
>
> sudo python /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/gufw/gufw.py
This generates a new pyc file, so beware of conflicts when updating to a
new gufw package. You will have to use the --force :)
developing for ARM Cortex-Mx on Raspberry pi.
>
> Any suggestions would be apreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Fulcrum
>
>
> [1] https://archlinuxarm.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15=10060
>
> * Hoping to use Raspberry pi as my daily computer so I could run Windows
> on my main desktop for gaming
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
go however Allan send out some ideas, finding mentors however
will be challenging :)
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2014-November/026748.html
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
or contacted Pierre? Developers/TU's usually don't follow arch-general.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
2 Comm: loadkeys Tainted: P DO
> > > 4.8.11-1-ARCH #1
> >
> > Your kenrel is tainted, mainline does not support tainted kernels.
> Look on subject. Tainted distro.
I've tried to be nice and helpful after the previous drama. But it seems
your attitude doesn't improv
x24/0x1a0
> [ 65.957874] PGD 1a09067 PUD 1a0a063 PMD 0
> [ 65.959198] Oops: [#17] PREEMPT SMP
> [ 65.993921] CPU: 2 PID: 892 Comm: loadkeys Tainted: P DO
> 4.8.11-1-ARCH #1
Your kenrel is tainted, mainline does not support tainted kernels.
--
Jelle van der Waa
sign
the logo to be removed from the website,
technically we support the snapd package.
[1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/snapd/
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
rt the 0ad and boost version..
> libboost_filesystem.so.1.61.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file
> or directory
>
> I've already tried to re-install boost and boost-libs.
>
> Kind regards
> Peter
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
a bit worse. We have 189 (i686/x86_64 included) packages which
are out of date for more than 30 days in our repos.
Then again I don't have any historical data of how many out of date
packages we usually have.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 08/05/16 at 01:01pm, Alive 4ever wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:08:29PM +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> > On 08/05/16 at 10:56am, Alive 4ever wrote:
> > > Since links package has been flagged out of date for almost one month, I
> > > can't help myself to
g updated
magically.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ity to treat flatpak similar
> as derivative distros.
Huh? I'd say we support running flatpak's, but obviously not what runs
in the flatpak :-)
>
> something like : flatpak is unsupported on Arch linux, ask the flatpak
> creator(s) for help.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t;
> > > [1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/lyx/
> > > [2] http://www.lyx.org/News
> >
> > Updated
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2KQf7Dbx7DUM2MtaXBxb3kzY0k/view?usp=drivesdk
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
u are basically on your own, build the kernel, core and tools from AUR.
You might want to look at Grsecurity though, since more people use it with
Arch and it has a package in [community]. [2]
[1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/31448
[2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Grsecurity
d to be moved to /etc.
>
>
> Whould it make sense for arch to activate it?
> I could not find any regressions with it!
If you really care about the feature make a bug report at our
bugtracker, then the packager can decide if we want to add support. [1]
[1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/topl
7/amlogic/odroid-c1
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 10/09/15 at 03:03pm, Cédric Girard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> python2-cherrypy [1] is stuck at an old version (3.6.0) despite having been
> rebuilt several times since flagged out of date. Is there any reason for
> this?
>
> Current revision is 3.8.0 [2].
I've just updated it yest
On 10/01/15 at 05:24pm, Antonio Rojas wrote:
> arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
>
> > Lucky me to have /lib exists in filesystem !! It seems something is
> > wrong, no?
This has been fixed with 0.39-2.
> >
>
> Yes --> bugs.archlinux.org
--
Jelle van der
package, you need to rebuild it yourself.
libicu.so.55 just hit [extra], but I can't see R depending on icu so
maybe it has some plugin which requires icu which you need to rebuild?
--
Jelle van der Waa
pgpu0mVbXOPbC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/linphone/
--
Jelle van der Waa
pgphKmA_OaGZM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 18 Jun 2014 16:56, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:49 PM, John Lane archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
I have attached a patch.
sorry just noticed the patch was backwards. Here it is again, corrected
:)
No, we still don't take attachments.
Read what
Please create a bugreport, i will fix it then asap.
On 20 May 2014 15:02, Savyasachee Jha savya.jh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Savyasachee Jha savya.jh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 9:55 PM, A Rojas nqn1976l...@gmail.com wrote:
Savyasachee Jha
and not for example aur/jre or the
openjdk packages in the normal repo.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
packages in the repos/aur
rather then using caba-install?
--
Jelle van der Waa
-devel/2014-March/001568.html
Greetings,
Manuel
FYI:
https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2014-March/025952.html
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
=packages/truecrypt
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
http://istruecryptauditedyet.com/
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of adding
a package to our repos in the first link.
1. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:HOWTO_Be_A_Packager
2. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:dbscripts
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
you,
~Celti
Sounds like https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61781
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
that the devs are volunteers.
mvg, Guus
Apache24 is already in AUR. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/apache24/
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
If anyone wants to test out the new Libreoffice beta release. Add the
folowing to your pacman.conf
[libreoffice]
Server = http://pkgbuild.com/~jelle/libreoffice
SigLevel = Optional
pacman -S libreoffice/libreoffice
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
this is necessary but the wiki makes
no mention of it so I may of course be wrong Does anybody else know more
about this?
Make a feature request on the bugtracker, so the dev can check it. Since
not all devs read arch-general.
--
Jelle van der Waa
pgpaoaNWrlVZH.pgp
Description: PGP
should support secure boot, it's
only forced on ARM. I would never run it on my laptop even if I had support
for it.
--
Jelle van der Waa
On 21/11/12 10:01, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
On 20 November 2012 19:34, Steve P. pub...@milehightexas.net wrote:
Hi
This is my first posting so bear with me.
I am trying to get qemu-kvm to work inside Virtualbox, but when I try to
#modprobe the kvm-intel or kvm_intel module, it errors stating
On 12/11/12 07:41, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
Why are some bug descriptions truncated?
Is:
FS#26200 - [gnome-control-center] 3.2.0-1 does not show any items when used
Should be:
FS#26200 - [gnome-control-center] 3.2.0-1 does not show any items when
used with LXDE
On 12/11/12 12:45, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
It is a wiki... fix it.
Sure, but it would be nice to find out what went wrong in the first place.
Oh and my script is here https://github.com/jelly/PyFlySpray
On 26/10/12 21:18, Jameson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
Is aur server down?
I can't get to it.
Yes it's down. And yes it will be fixed.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08/10/12 20:47, Arno Gaboury wrote:
Dear list,
I am trying with no sucess to install w7 on a VM on my Archlinux box.
I use virt-install,virtio,qemu, and i already managed to set up VM.
This time, after #virt-install --connect qemu///system --name=merdoz
--ram 4000 --cpu host --disk
On 11/09/12 12:48, André Prata wrote:
http://www.open-build-service.org/2012/09/10/arch-linux-support/
Are there any plans for seamless integration with the AUR?
André Prata
Patches are always welcome, but on a side note. We don't want people to
build AUR packages automatically since
the will of the community:
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=502d2113e4b02c3adb09a939
Please vote and spread!
Since when is archlinux a democracy?
Also you're poll doesn't give any arguments for or against the move,
unedacted users should look into the benefits of moving to systemd.
--
Jelle van der Waa
well as soon as RHEL switches to systemd, more and more distro's will
switch, so soon you might have to use it ;) (So better learn it now :p )
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
not forcing you to use it.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
systemd plans too ;)
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
on the general, so maybe I should
revisit them.
Calvin
Tom has listed the advantages a couple of times in arch-general.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
is just cheating.
So I should do audio productions with a Linux, that is unable to use my
audio card? How should I do this?
Regards,
Ralf
Have you ever tried to report your problems with PA and your soundcard
to upstream?
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 10/08/12 23:38, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:33:39 -0400
schrieb Brandon Watkins bwa...@gmail.com:
Systemd and pulseaudio are completely different pieces of software
with different purposes. Comparing them like that just because of the
author is comparing apples to oranges.
package (currently working on
LibO Writer after something like 4 hours on my AMD Athlon X2-215,
which is now something like 2 years old).
Thanks for any infos.
Have a good week-end.
Usually it's released when it's ready ( it's only two days ago, since it
has been released)
--
Jelle van
the Poettering stuff?
What if Poettering writes a kernel patch, are you going to stop using
linux then?
The poettering rants are a bit silly, since multiple devs work on
Pulseaudio and Systemd.
But back on topic, yes you can run KDE fine without Pulseaudio or Systemd.
--
Jelle van der Waa
Linux® user.
So anyone who wants to install Archlinux should be able to set up a
partition and know how to set up a swap partition.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
