On 29/04/20, Markus Schaaf via arch-general wrote:
> Am 29.04.20 um 13:44 schrieb Andy Pieters:
>
> > While it is relatively trivial to compile your own kernel with those
> > options enabled using Arch's build system, I think you'd better talk to the
> > actual people that made the change
On 27/04/20, Hauke Fath wrote:
> Re-reading, this is an Arch decision -- what is the rationale? Can
> anybody point me to a related discussion?
It's not, it just defaults to "Y", see patch in
https://github.com/archlinux/linux/commit/b24ee6c64ca785739b3ef8d95fd6becaad1bde39
There's also a bit
On 27/04/20, Hauke Fath wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 19:19:21 +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
> > I'll give some of the configuration.
>
> FTR, the borken system's kernel is
>
> Linux version 5.6.7-arch1-1 (linux@archlinux) (gcc version 9.3.0 (Arch
> Linux 9.3.0-1)) #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu, 23 Apr 2020
Hello,
I got a weird issue with sha256sum behaviour. When creating the package
with makepkg --geninteg I get a hash and when trying to build it with
makepkg the hash fails. The interesting bit is --ptintsrcinfo comes up
with a different hash.
Anyone got some idea why this might happen?
See
On 12/11/18, Danila Kiver via arch-general wrote:
> Agree, NB 9.0 is a complete headache and probably should not be considered
> an *upgrade* from 8.2. Even upcoming NB 10.0 does not seem to solve
> all the migration issues.
>
> Maybe Apache Netbeans (9.0 and higher) has to be distributed as a
On 01/08/18, Andrey Vihrov via arch-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently the way kernel sources are retrieved was changed in the linux
> package [1]. Now the sources are fetched from
> https://github.com/archlinux/linux.
>
> I see a few problems with this:
>
> - Previously the list of applied
- Replying on arch-general as don't have access on dev-public -
I might have missed something or proposed something which is not
feasible due to the fact I'm not vary familiar with Archlinux
infrastructure.
On 14/11/17, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> [..]
> # Migration
>
> There are several options
On 13/10/17, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 01:02:54 +0200, Rob Til Freedmen wrote:
> >... for these long outdated packages?
> >
> >https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=-last_update==schiv=Flagged
> >
> >https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=-last_update==speps=Flagged
Hello,
I
On 07/03/17, Peter Munch-Ellingsen wrote:
> Hi,
> the Nim package: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/nim/
> was marked out of date on 2016-10-24 but it's still not edited to reflect
> the new version of 0.16.2. Would anyone be so kind to adopt this package?
> If not could the
I was under the impression that the AUR git interface is just one big
git repo. Yes it checks out only the package you clone but the
references contain all packages (and commits). Am I mistaken to this?
Regards,
--
Leonidas Spyropoulos
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally
Hello,
New Gnome 3.22 which comes with wayland breaks urxvt. I'm using the
.xsession to start the daemon (urxvtd) and .Xresources to configure
the urxvt.
What's the alternative in the new wayland world? How do you configure
these now?
Thanks
--
Leonidas Spyropoulos
A: Because it messes up
11 matches
Mail list logo
