On 07/24/2012 01:15 AM, Martin Cigorraga wrote:
The beauty behind this is we are now enjoying the new paradigm without
reinstalling the
system while with other distros your only chance to make the switch is
reinstall not only
your OS but everything else!
Cheers.
Now that... is the beauty of
The problem is not Arch is bleeding edge nor this deep change from /lib to
/usr/lib,
the problem is that _people don't read_: everything was *clearly* explained
in the
website's frontpage news and in the wiki.
Here's what the people at Project Zomboid had to do to ensure it's
customers READ
a
On 07/20/12 at 03:27pm, Norbert Zeh wrote:
I
think the reason why you are having a much more serious issue is that it seems
you haven't updated your system in a long time. So now you're running into
dealing with two slightly tricky upgrades (filesystem + glibc) at the same
time.
I've had
On 07/20/2012 12:41 PM, Manolo Martínez wrote:
It would also be nice to know a bit more of the rationale behind the
moves. I'm sure that they are all for the best, and I trust arch
decision-makers (and one can find out more about the changes by reading
blogs and forum discussions), but still
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 02:41:44PM -0400, Manolo Martínez wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 03:27pm, Norbert Zeh wrote:
I
think the reason why you are having a much more serious issue is that it
seems
you haven't updated your system in a long time. So now you're running into
dealing with two
On 07/20/12 at 02:56pm, Daniel Wallace wrote:
All of those changes were discussed by the devs on arch-dev-public
filesystem -
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-June/023014.html
grub -
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-June/023147.html
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:15:47 -0400 Manolo Martínez man...@austrohungaro.com
wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 02:56pm, Daniel Wallace wrote:
All of those changes were discussed by the devs on arch-dev-public
I, for one, thought that running archlinux responsibly only committed me
to subscribing to and
On 07/20/12 at 09:31pm, Florian Pritz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:15:47 -0400 Manolo Martínez man...@austrohungaro.com
wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 02:56pm, Daniel Wallace wrote:
All of those changes were discussed by the devs on arch-dev-public
I, for one, thought that running archlinux
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Manolo Martínez
man...@austrohungaro.com wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 09:31pm, Florian Pritz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:15:47 -0400 Manolo Martínez
man...@austrohungaro.com wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 02:56pm, Daniel Wallace wrote:
All of those changes were
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Manolo Martínez
man...@austrohungaro.com wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 09:31pm, Florian Pritz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:15:47 -0400 Manolo Martínez
man...@austrohungaro.com wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 02:56pm, Daniel Wallace wrote:
All of those changes were
On 07/20/12 at 10:45pm, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Manolo Martínez
man...@austrohungaro.com wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 09:31pm, Florian Pritz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:15:47 -0400 Manolo Martínez
man...@austrohungaro.com wrote:
On 07/20/12 at 02:56pm, Daniel
Op 21 jul. 2012 01:13 schreef Manolo Martínez man...@austrohungaro.com
het volgende:
OK. I'll subscribe to arch-dev-public, then. I think it would be good if
the mailing lists page at archlinux.org explained what one is to
expect from each mailing list, and maybe recommend which mailing lists
12 matches
Mail list logo
