Hello all,
After all the intense discussions about systemd I decided
to try it out and see for myself. I tried it out on my desktop and was
quite impressed by it - it was much faster than the earlier
initscript. Further when I would background a daemon (say the network
daemon) in
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Aurko Roy roy.au...@gmail.com wrote:
2. I have an encrypted btrfs partition which it unlocks normally, but
while trying to mount says:
fsck: fsck.btrfs: not found
The problem seems to be that simply there is no such fsck.btrfs. It simply
does not exist, yet.
Hi,
Thanks for the quick reply. I wasn't aware of the changes in
crypttab syntax with systemd; but changing it the way you described it
did the trick for swap.
You're right, on digging deeper (logs) I found that the fsck had
failed earlier as well but I never noticed it as the boot process
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Aurko Roy roy.au...@gmail.com wrote:
You're right, on digging deeper (logs) I found that the fsck had
failed earlier as well but I never noticed it as the boot process
wasn't interrupted. I didn't face it again after setting passno. to 0.
I had heard about
Hi,
Thanks for the clarification. Also I was wondering if there was any
reason why Arch doesn't have the rc-local.service in systemd by
default. There was some stuff I ran in rc.local (reducing brightness,
proxy authentication) but it seems there is no rc-local service in
systemd. I am working on
Hi,
On 24 July 2012 11:25, Aurko Roy roy.au...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. Also I was wondering if there was any
reason why Arch doesn't have the rc-local.service in systemd by
default.
Have a look at the initscripts-systemd package, it contains rc-local
and
Hi,
Yeah it works fine with the initscripts-systemd package but I had
replaced that with the systemd-sysvcompat package for a pure systemd
setupd. I was wondering if there is a reason why they've discontinued
support for rc.local in that. AFAIK Fedora has a pure systemd setup (I
may be wrong
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Aurko Roy roy.au...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah it works fine with the initscripts-systemd package but I had
replaced that with the systemd-sysvcompat package for a pure systemd
setupd. I was wondering if there is a reason why they've discontinued
support for
Hi,
Thanks for your answer. In the end I decided to stick with
systemd-sysvcompat with my own rc-local.service (since I didn't need
the other stuff in the initscripts-systemd package). I must say I'm
starting to like systemd despite the minor hiccups due to changes in
conventions.
-aurko
On
9 matches
Mail list logo
