On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.netwrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:25:16 +0100, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Am 23.01.2013 11:10, schrieb arnaud gaboury:
Let me clarify a few things.
1- I didn't correctly understand the post from Allan
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:21:12AM +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
I was thereafter happy to log into my system, with no kernel panic !
I decided to reinstall all packages from the broken upgrade.
Nevertheless, everything is not fine. Somme apps are broken, and do not
know why. I guess it is
On Thursday 24 Jan 2013 10:21:12 arnaud gaboury wrote:
I am always scare each time I run #pacman -Syu, as I know it could be
tricky. I usually pay very much attention, and this particular upgrade was
my first real issue leaving me with a broken system.
I may think breaking/fixing our system is
Accidentally sent this too soon; keyboard-shortcut-fail!
On Thursday 24 Jan 2013 10:37:55 you wrote:
I'm pretty confident I could tackle breakage, but I still avoid [testing]
because I use my system for work, and troubleshooting these problems will
usually take time that I can't justify.
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:21:12 +0100
arnaud gaboury arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.netwrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:25:16 +0100, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Am 23.01.2013 11:10, schrieb arnaud gaboury:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:32:43AM +0100, Dennis Herbrich wrote:
by pacman -Ql|cut -d' ' -f2.
--quiet is our friend
pacman -Qlq
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Dennis Herbrich den...@archlinux.orgwrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:21:12AM +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
I was thereafter happy to log into my system, with no kernel panic !
I decided to reinstall all packages from the broken upgrade.
Nevertheless,
On Jan 23, 2013 5:20 AM, Martín Cigorraga m...@archlinux.us wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Jameson imntr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013 9:40 PM, arnaud gaboury arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you for help as my box is my working tool
O_o
You should'n do
Am 23.01.2013 11:10, schrieb arnaud gaboury:
Let me clarify a few things.
1- I didn't correctly understand the post from Allan about toolchain, thus
my brocken update when #pacman - S filesystem
Then why do you use testing?
2- As a newbye,
Then why do you use testing?
signature.asc
On Wednesday 23 Jan 2013 10:10:17 arnaud gaboury wrote:
Good morning guys,
Let me clarify a few things.
1- I didn't correctly understand the post from Allan about toolchain, thus
my brocken update when #pacman - S filesystem
2- As a newbye, I usually pay lots attention to upgrades and
On Jan 23, 2013 12:04 PM, Paul Gideon Dann pdgid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 23 Jan 2013 10:10:17 arnaud gaboury wrote:
Good morning guys,
Let me clarify a few things.
1- I didn't correctly understand the post from Allan about toolchain,
thus
my brocken update when #pacman - S
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:07 PM, arnaud gaboury arnaud.gabo...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jan 23, 2013 12:04 PM, Paul Gideon Dann pdgid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 23 Jan 2013 10:10:17 arnaud gaboury wrote:
Good morning guys,
Let me clarify a few things.
1- I didn't correctly
On 24/01/13 00:08, arnaud gaboury wrote:
My issue maybe comes from the upgrade of glibc 2.17-2 from testing.
I have now /lib -- usr/lib and lib64/ usr/lib.
/usr/lib64 lib
Is this the expected structure after the upgrade ?
Yes
Give the complete package list of what was
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 24/01/13 00:08, arnaud gaboury wrote:
My issue maybe comes from the upgrade of glibc 2.17-2 from testing.
I have now /lib -- usr/lib and lib64/ usr/lib.
/usr/lib64 lib
Is this the expected structure
On 24/01/13 00:29, arnaud gaboury wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 24/01/13 00:08, arnaud gaboury wrote:
My issue maybe comes from the upgrade of glibc 2.17-2 from testing.
I have now /lib -- usr/lib and lib64/ usr/lib.
/usr/lib64
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:07 PM, arnaud gaboury
arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com wrote:
I finally managed to finish the upgrade on Archiso by removing
/mnt/usr/lib64 after I checked #pacman - Qo for each file/symlink. They all
were not owned by any package.
Now booting to my system still give me a
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:25:16 +0100, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Am 23.01.2013 11:10, schrieb arnaud gaboury:
Let me clarify a few things.
1- I didn't correctly understand the post from Allan about toolchain,
thus
my brocken update when #pacman - S filesystem
Then why do you
On Jan 22, 2013 9:40 PM, arnaud gaboury arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear list,
testing repo is enabled on my box. Today upgrade of glibc, filesystem and
Linux failed and leaves me with an unbootable machine.
I boot with Archiso, then mount /, /boot and /user on /mnt/. From this
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Jameson imntr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013 9:40 PM, arnaud gaboury arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you for help as my box is my working tool
O_o
You should'n do that, you know...
As Jameson said, what are the logs?
I didn't fully understand
19 matches
Mail list logo
