Re: [arch-general] makechrootpkg vs. namcap

2013-03-09 Thread Lieven Moors
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 01:17:11AM +0100, Maxime GAUDUIN wrote: > On Mar 9, 2013 1:16 AM, "Maxime GAUDUIN" wrote: > > > > Just put the dep in makedepends, namcap only checks for runtime deps, > can't detect build dep AFAIK. > > > > -- > > Maxime > > > > On Mar 9, 2013 12:28 AM, "Lieven Moors" wro

Re: [arch-general] makechrootpkg vs. namcap

2013-03-08 Thread Maxime GAUDUIN
On Mar 9, 2013 1:16 AM, "Maxime GAUDUIN" wrote: > > Just put the dep in makedepends, namcap only checks for runtime deps, can't detect build dep AFAIK. > > -- > Maxime > > On Mar 9, 2013 12:28 AM, "Lieven Moors" wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I was building a package using makechrootpkg, and the build wa

Re: [arch-general] makechrootpkg vs. namcap

2013-03-08 Thread Maxime GAUDUIN
Just put the dep in makedepends, namcap only checks for runtime deps, can't detect build dep AFAIK. -- Maxime On Mar 9, 2013 12:28 AM, "Lieven Moors" wrote: > Hi, > > I was building a package using makechrootpkg, and the build was > failing because a mandatory dependency was missing. But when I

[arch-general] makechrootpkg vs. namcap

2013-03-08 Thread Lieven Moors
Hi, I was building a package using makechrootpkg, and the build was failing because a mandatory dependency was missing. But when I add the dependency, namcap complains that it is not needed. I was wondering how namcap checks dependencies, and what the particular shortcommings are of namcap when