[arch-general] Question regarding cmake

Hello everybody, I noticed that extra/cmake depends on core or extra packages exception made for community/rhash. I was trying to use build.opensuse.org to build a package but was unable to use cmake due to the fact that it depends on a package in community which is not included in

Re: [arch-general] Question regarding cmake

On 10/10/17 at 02:45pm, Valo wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I noticed that extra/cmake depends on core or extra packages exception > made for community/rhash. > > I was trying to use build.opensuse.org to build a package but was unable > to use cmake due to the fact that it depends on a package

Re: [arch-general] Question regarding cmake

Hello, On 10/10/2017 02:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > To be honest, this is also a bit silly of OBS (also filtering a lot of > "license" issue packages) and I believe you can actually enable the > community repo on it. Thanks, as I started to experiment with OBS only in the last days I

Re: [arch-general] gnucash [aur]->[community]?

El Tue, 10 Oct 2017 15:49:27 -0400, Ido Rosen escribió: > Gnucash has 44 votes on AUR. It's useful (and very old, stable) > accounting/bookkeeping software. Would any TUs be willing to migrate it > from AUR to [community]? > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnucash/ Not until it is ported

Re: [arch-general] gnucash [aur]->[community]?

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Morten Linderud wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 03:49:27PM -0400, Ido Rosen wrote: >> Gnucash has 44 votes on AUR. It's useful (and very old, stable) >> accounting/bookkeeping software. Would any TUs be willing to migrate it >> from AUR to

Re: [arch-general] gnucash [aur]->[community]?

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 04:34:35PM -0400, Eric Blau wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Morten Linderud wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 03:49:27PM -0400, Ido Rosen wrote: > >> Gnucash has 44 votes on AUR. It's useful (and very old, stable) > >> accounting/bookkeeping

[arch-general] gnucash [aur]->[community]?

Gnucash has 44 votes on AUR. It's useful (and very old, stable) accounting/bookkeeping software. Would any TUs be willing to migrate it from AUR to [community]? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnucash/

Re: [arch-general] gnucash [aur]->[community]?

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 03:49:27PM -0400, Ido Rosen wrote: > Gnucash has 44 votes on AUR. It's useful (and very old, stable) > accounting/bookkeeping software. Would any TUs be willing to migrate it > from AUR to [community]? > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnucash/ It was moved from

Re: [arch-general] gnucash [aur]->[community]?

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Morten Linderud wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 04:34:35PM -0400, Eric Blau wrote: >> >> While it is true that webkitgtk2 has security vulnerabilities and >> should not be used for web browsing, web apps, etc., gnucash merely >> uses it to

Re: [arch-general] firejail and network

Dear Shridhar, It's a known bug in firejail that has apparently been fixed upstream. Once Arch's maintainer does a pull you may be fine: https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/1591#issuecomment-334749301 So, it is not you :-) Have a nice day/night, NTS On 10 October 2017 at 03:33,

Re: [arch-general] firejail and network

On Tuesday 10 October 2017 6:33:25 AM IST Herminio Hernandez, Jr. via arch- general wrote: > Do you just run 'firejail firefox' from the terminal? Do have any custom > settings? yes, just 'firejail firefox', no customizations either. Thanks. -- Regards Shridhar

Re: [arch-general] firejail and network

On Tuesday 10 October 2017 11:33:25 AM IST NTS wrote: > Dear Shridhar, > > It's a known bug in firejail that has apparently been fixed upstream. > Once Arch's maintainer does a pull you may be fine: > > https://github.com/netblue30/firejail/issues/1591#issuecomment-334749301 > > So, it is not