Re: [arch-general] New - systemd 234 - luks partition fails to ask for password - workaround

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 07:57:18AM +0200, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > On 2017-07-17 06:38, SanskritFritz via arch-general wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Genes Lists via arch-general < > > arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > > >> I have a work around which is to add timeout=90 >

Re: [arch-general] How can I set CAPS LOCK as Escape throughout reboot

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 01:51:59PM +, Junayeed Ahnaf via arch-general wrote: > Hello, > > Currently I use "setxkbmap -option caps:escape" and it works well, but > I'd like to know how to make it persistent through reboot. I set this > line in .xinitrc but it didn't work. It should work. I

Re: [arch-general] gnupg: systemd enable in post_install

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 02:24:35PM +0200, Georg wrote: > > > what's the rationale to enable the gnupg sockets in post_install of > > > the > > > package? > > > > > > https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/install?h=packages/gnupg#n21 > > > > > > I don't disagree that the

Re: [arch-general] Login Statistics Similar to Centos

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 05:57:46PM -0400, Storm Dragon via arch-general wrote: > Howdy, > I recently was playing with a Centos server. One of the things I found > interesting about the experience is the information presented on login: > > Last login: Tue Aug 29 17:38:48 EDT 2017 on pts/0 > Last

Re: [arch-general] Detect broken DHCP setup

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 12:09:52AM +0200, Giovanni Santini via arch-general wrote: > On that device I am using *systemd-networkd + systemd-resolved* for the > network setup. However, I saw no real method to check if the DHCP > configuration is valid (while NetworkManager provides an element

Re: [arch-general] Detect broken DHCP setup

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 11:27:13AM +0200, Giovanni Santini via arch-general wrote: > Il 06/09/2017 01:09, Leonid Isaev via arch-general ha scritto: > > > > What does it mean a valid DHCP setup? By reconnection you mean that your > > client > > re-request a lease from

Re: [arch-general] Login Statistics Similar to Centos

On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 08:38:24PM +0200, William Gathoye wrote: > > > On 09/01/2017 08:26 PM, brent s. wrote: > > > You don't execute pam_lastlog.so directly. > > > As shown, pam is calling the pam_lastlog.so object (which is why you > > can't execute it; it's not an executable, it's a Shared

Re: [arch-general] Server Management Tools

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 09:31:25PM +0200, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote: > On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 18:52:39 + > Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > > > You seriously consider unattended update of packages on servers a good > > practice? > > On Arch? Good luck with that. > > Who

Re: [arch-general] pacman and journalctl

On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 07:15:09AM +, Tom M. wrote: > ha! that was easy, thanks. perhaps manpage needs updating... man pacman.conf says that UseSyslog means "Log action messages through syslog(). This will insert log entries into /var/log/messages or equivalent." It doesn't specify a syslog

Re: [arch-general] pacman and journalctl

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:10:51PM +, Tom M. wrote: > ahoy there! > > is there some cleaver way of making pacman log to journalctl? or plans > to implement such a feature? Uncomment UseSyslog in pacman.conf... -- Leonid Isaev

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:01:57AM -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > We're currently in feature freeze for pacman 5.1 > > Anyone who hopes to have b2sum support in *future* versions of pacman, > would be well advised to come across as a person seeking to extend > support for the

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:23:39AM +0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi Eli, > > > Maybe you could ask the coreutils developers whatever happened to > > implementing Keccak checksumming tools. > > SHA-3? Have you see > https://www.imperialviolet.org/2017/05/31/skipsha3.html > I've also seen

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 11:38:01PM -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > When you say "still", that implies that there was any sort of effort to > change that in the first place... Fair enough :) I thought it's a slow natural process... > - not any sort of security check at all, they're

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

Hi, I'm intentionally using the title from Nov/Dec 2016 [0] to ease googling. I decided to check the status of this, and there is still 325 packages with only md5sums in [core] and [extra] (I didn't check [community]). Below results are generated by the attached script... Is there

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 08:08:31PM -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote: > [extra] > ... This list should also include "python-retrying". I should have grepped more carefully, sigh... -- Leonid Isaev

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 08:08:31PM -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote: > [0] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2016-December/042 Oops, this link should have been https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2016-December/042700.html -- Leonid Isaev

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 12:31:39AM -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > PGP keys are also far more likely to appear in multiple independently > verifiable locations, you can embed them in your DNS records, post them > on your blog, github profile, keybase.io proofs utilizing DNS as well

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 09:30:51PM +0200, Neven Sajko wrote: > I would just like to note that SHA-2 hashes are inferior to Keccak and > to BLAKE2. So better not to spend effort migrating to SHA-2. Strength of various SHA hashes is a different topic. My only point was that relying on md5 these

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:06:08AM +0200, NicoHood wrote: > I really like you effort on stronger hashes. I totally aggree with you > that we need those, if we can't have GPG signatures by the maintainers. > Hashes just help in less usecases than GPG signatures, of course, but > they do.

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:19:19PM +0200, Neven Sajko via arch-general wrote: > On 13 May 2018 at 20:11, Neven Sajko wrote: > > I do agree that using md5 is absurd, ... > > To clarify, md5 *is* unsecure and is even slower or not significantly > faster than hashes from the

Re: [arch-general] sshd - limiting sequential no. or files opened via sftp in kate?

[long email, so top-posting] MaxSessions and MaxStartups in /etc/ssh/sshd_config? Cheers, L. On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 01:44:37AM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > All, > > Not sure where to look for this. I have always kept kate projects different > things like, different application

Re: [arch-general] Set ip lan address /etc/environment

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 01:07:59PM +0200, Maykel Franco via arch-general wrote: > Hi, I put this text in /etc/environment: > > $ source /etc/environment > > ip="$(ifconfig | grep -A 1 'eth0' | tail -1 | cut -d ':' -f 2 | cut -d > ' ' -f 1)" > > $ echo $ip > > 192.168.0.33 > > Works fine, but

Re: [arch-general] Set ip lan address /etc/environment

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:44:25AM +0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi Maykel, > > > I need define variable called ip with current ip address machine... > > And when reboot machine, the variable ip always has ip address. > > Yes, I think we all figured that bit out. :-) > But why; what's going

Re: [arch-general] Set ip lan address /etc/environment

On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 08:48:03AM +0200, Maykel Franco via arch-general wrote: > 2018-05-31 12:01 GMT+02:00 Leonid Isaev via arch-general > : > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:44:25AM +0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > >> Hi Maykel, > >> > >> > I need define

Re: [arch-general] Install Archlinux on HP Elitebook

On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 07:19:17PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > MENU LABEL Ubuntu ^Q LightScribe Rt > LINUX /.boot/ubuntu_q/boot/vmlinuz-3.6.5-rt14 > APPEND root=LABEL=q ro nomodeset > INITRD /.boot/ubuntu_q/boot/initrd.img-3.6.5-rt14 > > LABEL Suse > MENU LABEL ^Vintage SUSE

Re: [arch-general] systemd permissions on run?

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 11:23:34AM +0800, Oon-Ee Ng via arch-general wrote: > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > > > Did something change recently w.r.t this? I have smbd, postgresql, and > > squid all failing on me with the following error:- > > > >

Re: [arch-general] How to build package in "clean chroot" using the "-U" parameter?

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 02:36:17PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general wrote: > Em dezembro 22, 2017 13:55 Manuel Reimer escreveu: > > On 12/22/2017 03:17 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general wrote: > > I have an existing build system that I call with root permissions and > > from

Re: [arch-general] Services with DefaultDependencies=no

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:51:13PM -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > On 8/27/18 8:45 AM, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While going over .service files on my system, I noticed that quite a > > few of them, not belonging

[arch-general] Services with DefaultDependencies=no

Hi, While going over .service files on my system, I noticed that quite a few of them, not belonging to systemd package, contain DefaultDependencies=no (DD=no). This is understandable (perhaps) for programs like systemd-journald, but what about normal daemons, like rpcbind, haveged and

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 04:04:14PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 07:38:12 -0600, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 03:02:38PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> Eli, wouldn't it be easier for you to ignore people who ar

Re: [arch-general] update today causes avantfax_hourly cron: Exec format error?

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 03:02:38PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Eli, wouldn't it be easier for you to ignore people who are not as wise > and psychologically balanced as you are? I doubt that anybody of us is > able to learn from your wise comments, more likely we laugh at you, > because we are

Re: [arch-general] ClamAV Flagging systemd package

On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 05:19:29PM +0200, LoneVVolf wrote: > On 14-07-18 16:52, David Murray via arch-general wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > My nightly full-system ClamAV scan kicked out this last night: > > > > /var/cache/pacman/pkg/systemd-238.133-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz: > >

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:19:37PM +0200, David Runge wrote: > FYI, > I'm currently working on bringing the user space tools to [community], but > the rule sets will require testing and possibly we'll even have to have our > own set shipped with the package. > > I'll let you know asap. Thanks

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 02:53:04PM -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > Heftig retracted his initial willingness to enable apparmor because he > did not think it useful enough without the userland tools. It wasn't > rejected because we hate the idea or consider it not Arch-like... it was

Re: [arch-general] AppArmor support

On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 06:13:24PM -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > On 9/9/18 4:00 PM, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote: > > FWIW, I actually agree with #59733: CONFIG_AUDIT=n was blocking AppArmor > > adoption... Perhaps relevant: > > https://lists.debian.org

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [core] / [extra] cleanup

On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 05:06:11PM +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > *Move to [extra]* > > - ifenslave - Don't see why it is required in core, also orphan > - libgssglue/librpcsecgss - move to extra, nothing in [core] deps on it. > (archboot and nfs-utils used to dep on it) > - b43-fwcutter - Is

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:17:21PM +, Carsten Mattner wrote: > On 3/12/18, Leonid Isaev via arch-general <arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > What's wrong with btrfs? Yeah, I know it is not marked "stable", but this > > is just a label. And people s

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:24:37PM +, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: > On 3/12/18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > > On 03/11/2018 10:00 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote: > >> I'm happy to hear that. My rationale is based on past

Re: [arch-general] Update to 4.15.8 on dual quad-core box locked on ( 3/16) Install DKMS modules, need help resurecting

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:41:46AM -0400, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > On 03/13/2018 12:30 AM, John Ramsden via arch-general wrote: > > Actually, you can easily create an arch ISO with ZFS embedded into > > it. It's what I do, and it takes about five minutes to create. > > > >

Re: [arch-general] mandb - numerous parse failures on run (parallel, fribidi, numactl, pcre2, netpbm, etc..)

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 07:37:30PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 03/14/2018 06:55 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > > Is this just something that is expected over time? > > I think the short answer is that the man-db service is not enabled by default. > Sorry for the noise here. man-db.service

Re: [arch-general] procps-ng 3.3.13 and its new topdefaultrc

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:20:10PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 04/11/2018 12:08 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > > It's ironic, I guess, that the procps-ng developers did this in order to > > provoke people into learning how to configure top, but now we have > > people preferring

Re: [arch-general] Curious about arch repository policy

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 08:27:16PM +0530, Sudarshan Kakoty via arch-general wrote: > Hello... > > I was reading "Arch Wiki" and felt curious about that difference > between extra and community repo. > > Some packages, such as "meson" is in the "extra" repo, whereas "ninja" > is in "community"

Re: [arch-general] Curious about arch repository policy

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 08:39:30PM +0100, morganamilo via arch-general wrote: > > > On 27/03/18 20:34, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 08:27:16PM +0530, Sudarshan Kakoty via arch-general > > wrote: > > > Hello... > > > &

Re: [arch-general] Missing auth.log

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 01:43:17AM +0100, Maxe wrote: > Hi, > > One of our systems, running ARCH Linux, was compromised (a non-privileged > account, fortunately). But, we could not find /var/log/auth.log or similar > for investigation. Does the journal keep track of login attempts? It seems >

Re: [arch-general] Firefox crashes randomly

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:36:43PM +0200, Hubert Hauser via arch-general wrote: > Hello! > > How is your recommended space for shared memory (/dev/shm)? Will be > these instructions okay > (https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=68434)? How many memory is > allocated for /dev/shm by default?

Re: [arch-general] pambase update now requires explicit service files in /etc/pam.d/ - dovecot affected

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:15:39AM -0500, Jens John wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, at 12:02, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote: > > I am sorry to ask this so late in the discussion, but why Arch default of > > the > > "other" module was insecure (and hence why

Re: [arch-general] pambase update now requires explicit service files in /etc/pam.d/ - dovecot affected

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:54:22PM -0600, Doug Newgard via arch-general wrote: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:42:01 -0800 > frede...@ofb.net wrote: > > > I don't understand the need for that reaction... > > He posted that he's glad he broke the rules, implying that he'd gladly do it > again in the