Re: [arch-general] OpenRA / Mono exceptions

Op zo 4 mrt. 2018 16:31 schreef Alajos Odoyle : > > On 2018-03-04 13:50, Guus Snijders via arch-general wrote: > > > > Just out of curiosity; could you try deleting the symlink and > LD_preloading > > /usr/lib/libtifinfo.so.5 ? > > > > The current replies on the ML are a

Re: [arch-general] OpenRA / Mono exceptions

On 2018-03-04 13:50, Guus Snijders via arch-general wrote: Just out of curiosity; could you try deleting the symlink and LD_preloading /usr/lib/libtifinfo.so.5 ? The current replies on the ML are a technically correct, though a bit blunt. If the preload tricks actually works, we could advice

Re: [arch-general] OpenRA / Mono exceptions

Op vr 2 mrt. 2018 12:18 schreef Alajos Odoyle : > On 2018-03-02 11:38, Dan Haworth wrote: > > > > I had the same issue, seems to be related to the following bug > > https://github.com/mono/mono/issues/6752. I downgraded ncurses to 6.0 to > > get things going again. > > > >

Re: [arch-general] OpenRA / Mono exceptions

On 03/03/2018 11:56 AM, Alajos Odoyle wrote: > On 2018-03-02 13:07, Levente Polyak via arch-general wrote: >> >> That's literally an incredibly stupid idea. Symlink >> /usr/lib/libtinfo.so.5 to /usr/lib/libtinfo.so.6 does not magically >> make it compatible for both, it is ABI incompatible that's

Re: [arch-general] OpenRA / Mono exceptions

Op za 3 mrt. 2018 18:14 schreef Doug Newgard via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org>: > On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 17:56:52 +0100 > Alajos Odoyle wrote: > > > On 2018-03-02 13:07, Levente Polyak via arch-general wrote: > > > > > > [symlink lib version] > > > > It will do

Re: [arch-general] OpenRA / Mono exceptions

On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 17:56:52 +0100 Alajos Odoyle wrote: > On 2018-03-02 13:07, Levente Polyak via arch-general wrote: > > > > That's literally an incredibly stupid idea. Symlink /usr/lib/libtinfo.so.5 > > to /usr/lib/libtinfo.so.6 does not magically make it compatible

Re: [arch-general] OpenRA / Mono exceptions

On 2018-03-02 13:07, Levente Polyak via arch-general wrote: That's literally an incredibly stupid idea. Symlink /usr/lib/libtinfo.so.5 to /usr/lib/libtinfo.so.6 does not magically make it compatible for both, it is ABI incompatible that's the whole point of a soname bump. Anything linking to

Re: [arch-general] OpenRA / Mono exceptions

On March 2, 2018 12:38:33 PM GMT+01:00, Dan Haworth wrote: >On 02/03/18 11:17, Alajos Odoyle wrote: >> On 2018-03-02 11:38, Dan Haworth wrote: >>> >>> I had the same issue, seems to be related to the following bug >>> https://github.com/mono/mono/issues/6752. I downgraded

Re: [arch-general] OpenRA / Mono exceptions

On 02/03/18 11:17, Alajos Odoyle wrote: On 2018-03-02 11:38, Dan Haworth wrote: I had the same issue, seems to be related to the following bug https://github.com/mono/mono/issues/6752. I downgraded ncurses to 6.0 to get things going again. --dan Thanks, that was quick! I also had to

Re: [arch-general] OpenRA / Mono exceptions

On 2018-03-02 11:38, Dan Haworth wrote: I had the same issue, seems to be related to the following bug https://github.com/mono/mono/issues/6752. I downgraded ncurses to 6.0 to get things going again. --dan Thanks, that was quick! I also had to install libtinfo5 (AUR) and symlink

Re: [arch-general] OpenRA / Mono exceptions

On 02/03/18 10:34, Alajos Odoyle wrote: Hi all, When trying to run OpenRA from the community repository or when building the package myself (using the community PKGBUILD) I get Mono exceptions like the one below [1]. At first I thought it could be an upstream issue but sure enough it builds

[arch-general] OpenRA / Mono exceptions

Hi all, When trying to run OpenRA from the community repository or when building the package myself (using the community PKGBUILD) I get Mono exceptions like the one below [1]. At first I thought it could be an upstream issue but sure enough it builds just fine when using a clean chroot. As I