Re: [arch-general] Question regarding cmake

[Valo]

Hello,


On 10/10/2017 02:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> To be honest, this is also a bit silly of OBS (also filtering a lot of
> "license" issue packages) and I believe you can actually enable the
> community repo on it.
Thanks, as I started to experiment with OBS only in the last days I
didn't notice that I could add additional paths under di repository and
it actually turned out there is an Arch:Community repo.
I just couldn't find at the beginning and found only resources stating
community packages weren't available.

Thanks and sorry for the noise

-- 

sValo
--
PGP ID 0x06DD1631
--
www.eigenlab.org
--
www.exploitpisa.org
--
"It must be inconvenient to be made of flesh," said the Scarecrow
thoughtfully, "for you must sleep, and eat and drink. However, you  
have
brains, and it is worth a lot of bother to be able to think properly."
[The Wonderful Wizard of Oz]
--
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments,it is a secret
proprietary format, so it is hard for me to read. If you send me plain
text, HTML, PDF, or ODF then I will read it without any problem.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Thanks




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] Question regarding cmake

[Jelle van der Waa]

On 10/10/17 at 02:45pm, Valo wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> 
> I noticed that extra/cmake depends on core or extra packages exception
> made for community/rhash.
> 
> I was trying to use build.opensuse.org to build a package but was unable
> to use cmake due to the fact that it depends on a package in community
> which is not included in build.opensuse.org
> 
> My question is: is it fine for an extra package to depend on a package
> found in community?

That would be a lot better.

> I tried to search for policies but didn't find anything.

Only unwritten rules I believe.

> I'm saying it would be useful as cmake is used by many project ad being
> able to use it on opensuse build service would enable more packages to
> be built there for Arch.

To be honest, this is also a bit silly of OBS (also filtering a lot of
"license" issue packages) and I believe you can actually enable the
community repo on it.

-- 
Jelle van der Waa


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature