On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 06:11:31PM +0100, Fabio Riga wrote:
> > Sorry. We have to wait pandoc update:
> >
> > Failed to satisfy the following dependencies for hakyll:
> > pandoc >=1.10 && <1.11
> >
> > Magnus, is there a reason to not up
Any chance we can get hakyll updated from 3.5 -> 4? I know haskell-core
automatically updates, but wasn't sure haskell-web is.
http://jaspervdj.be/posts/2013-01-16-hakyll-4.0.html
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hakyll
If there's a better way to make these requests, let me know.
Cheers,
es
__
06, 2013 at 09:31:44PM -0800, Ethan Schoonover wrote:
> > I noticed that xmonad is still at xmonad 0.10 in [haskell-core]. I'm
> > assuming that the next time that the repo is synchronized with
> > hackage we'll see it? Eager for the new new :)
>
> I've noticed
I noticed that xmonad is still at xmonad 0.10 in [haskell-core]. I'm
assuming that the next time that the repo is synchronized with hackage
we'll see it? Eager for the new new :)
Best,
Ethan
http://ethanschoonover.com/solarized
___
arch-haskell mailing
I'd also like to encourage the arch-haskell team to talk to Michael on
this. The current Haskell repos have made things so much better than they
were even a year ago, but if we can get behind a rising tide to lift all
boats, I'd love to see that happen. I am still end user / novice enough to
feel u
Alessandro, many thanks. You cured that issue. Taffybar still awkward to
install, but no longer being hamstrung by using the old repo.
Best regards,
Ethan
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Alessandro Pezzoni <
alessandro_pezz...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> [haskell-extra] is deprecated. Please use [ha
Trying to get taffybar running here and thus installing haskell-dyre from
[haskell-extra] chokes on a too low ghc requirement. Any pointers here?
Thanks -es
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ar
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>
> Why not grab the packages from AUR instead? For instance,
> xmonad-contrib-darcs: http://is.gd/3r09GG
>
AUR xmonad-darcs and xmonad-contrib-darcs both fail on dependencies which
is what drove me to switch over to the haskell- repos in th
:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Ethan Schoonover
> wrote:
> > I'm using the arch-haskell repos now and very happy with the results. The
> > only snag I've hit is this: I'm trying to use XMonad.Actions.Navigation2D
> > which is not in the exposed modules list
I'm using the arch-haskell repos now and very happy with the results. The
only snag I've hit is this: I'm trying to use XMonad.Actions.Navigation2D
which is not in the exposed modules list of haskell-xmonad-contrib
currently. This is probably coals to Newcastle, but here's the PDF summary
of that m
Yeah, sorry about that confusion on my part. FWIW I am *really* happy with
the new life in these repos. I am using them with my fire-and-forget
archblocks installer now and I get xmonad up and running with no trouble at
all.
Thanks for all this hard work, Magnus, et al.
Cheers,
Ethan
On Fri, Oct
Disregard previous mail; I'm assuming I just misunderstood the earlier
mail. old must be the former testing. Correct me if I'm offbase otherwise
ignore.
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Ethan Schoonover
wrote:
> haskell-testing seems to have dropped offline (
> http://www.kiwil
haskell-testing seems to have dropped offline (
http://www.kiwilight.com/haskell/testing/$arch ) around the same time that
haskell-old appeared. Is this because GHC 7.6 is in the main repo now? Or
unrelated events?
Thanks,
Ethan Schoonover
e...@ethanschoonover.com http://ethanschoonover.com
most of the AUR since I came across that thread. Haskell is
starting to feel fragile on Arch.
What about moving *all* Haskell related packages to the Haskell Arch
repo? All the Haskell Platform stuff, alex, happy, etc.
Ethan Schoonover
Github/Freenode: altercation - Solarized:
14 matches
Mail list logo
