Il 22/05/2013 16:57, Pierre Radermecker ha scritto:
> Hello Fabio,
>
> Any update ? It has been broken for quite a while now. I guess we are
> only a few using the web repo (as so few souls are complaining) but it
> might be fair to update the doc and flag the web repo as out-of-dated.
>
> Just f
better alternative. There are now 5
> versions of git-annex for arch-linux and there are all broken ... I
> guess this is a sign that sadly enough we need the big binaries option ...
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Fabio Riga
> *To:* Pierre Radermecker
> *Cc:
t;
> 2013/5/5 Fabio Riga mailto:rifa...@gmail.com>>
>
> Il 05/05/2013 11:44, Pierre Radermecker ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If I am not mistaken, [Haskell-web] is no more in sync with
> > [haskell-core]. For isntance, the package &quo
Il 05/05/2013 11:44, Pierre Radermecker ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> If I am not mistaken, [Haskell-web] is no more in sync with
> [haskell-core]. For isntance, the package "haskell-lens" cannot be
> installed with ghc 7.6.3.
>
> Can I expect a fix in a couple of days or should I go with cabal in the
>
Il 30/04/2013 09:06, Magnus Therning ha scritto:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Leif Warner wrote:
>> What gives?
>
> There are a few dbus packages on hackage. The one in [haskell-core]
> is DBus (http://hackage.haskell.org/package/DBus) which is rather old,
> and quite possibly a candidate
Il 29/04/2013 10:34, Magnus Therning ha scritto:
> I'm in the progress of re-building all of [haskell-core] with the
> latest release of ghc, 7.6.3, so please if you would refrain from
> making any changes to HABS until I've pushed that to github. Thanks.
Please tell me when you're done, so I can
Git-annex is updated. Please tell me if there's any difference.
Fabio
2013/4/18 Fabio Riga :
> Sorry, I have no idea... I'm going to look into AUR pkgbuild to find
> differences
>
> Fabio
>
> 2013/4/13 Pierre Radermecker
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>
Sorry, I have no idea... I'm going to look into AUR pkgbuild to find
differences
Fabio
2013/4/13 Pierre Radermecker
>
> Hello,
>
> I am having weird behavior with git-annex going from the AUR version to the
> haskell-web repo one (actually going from the 32 bits to the 64 bits one). It
> m
You should use `haskell-xmonad` package. `xmonad` is from [community]
and has another set of dependencies.
Fabio
2013/4/11 Sean Escriva :
> I do have them before [extra]
>
> Even just pacman -S ghc xmonad didn't seem to work right
>
> Here's a section of the pacman.log messages, there's plenty mo
Il 04/04/2013 17:32, Nicolas Pouillard ha scritto:
> Quoting Fabio Riga (2013-04-04 02:46:59)
>> Hello,
>
> Hello,
>
>> just wanted to say that now git-annex is in the repo. As it was a very
>> hard beast to compile, please help me check if anything is wrong.
>
Il 04/04/2013 16:17, Magnus Therning ha scritto:
> Very cool, it's long been on my list of things to check out and you just
> made it a little easier for me to do :)
>
> /M
As it depends on many packages in [habs-web] it seems more natural to
stay there. Anyway we should take some time to reconsi
Hello,
just wanted to say that now git-annex is in the repo. As it was a very
hard beast to compile, please help me check if anything is wrong.
Bye
Fabio
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arc
Il 02/03/2013 19:25, Magnus Therning ha scritto:
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 01:44:59AM +0100, Fabio wrote:
>> For people using happstack-server from [habs-web], don't do it, until
>> the release of new version of 'network'. See below for the details.
>>
>> Fabio
>
> Let me know if this drags out,
Hakyll 4.1.4.0 is now in [habs-web].
Fabio
2013/2/16 Fabio Riga :
> 2013/2/15 Magnus Therning :
>> It's been updated now.
>>
>> /M
>
>
> Wonderful! I'm going to update too.
> Fabio
___
arch-haskell
2013/2/15 Magnus Therning :
> It's been updated now.
>
> /M
Wonderful! I'm going to update too.
Fabio
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
2013/1/27 Magnus Therning :
> I've sent a question to the maintainer of Graphalyze if he's already
> working on a version that works with the latest pandoc.
>
> /M
Hi Magnus,
did you get any response from the maintainer of Graphalize?
Fabio
___
arch-h
2013/2/3 Magnus Therning :
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 02:04:21PM +0100, Fabio Riga wrote:
>> Ok, I'll update habs-web as soon as possible.
>
> Excellent. I've just finished building for i686 so now both repos
> have GHC 7.6.2. This time I've remembered to pus
Ok, I'll update habs-web as soon as possible.
Fabio
2013/2/3 Magnus Therning
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:27:54AM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > I've just put up a first attempt at a repo with GHC 7.6.2 (x86_64 only):
> >
> > [haskell-test]
> > Server = http://www.kiwilight.com/hask
Sorry. We have to wait pandoc update:
Failed to satisfy the following dependencies for hakyll:
pandoc >=1.10 && <1.11
Magnus, is there a reason to not update pandoc?
Fabio
2013/1/25 Fabio Riga
> I'm updating right now. Late this night or tomorrow it should be update
I'm updating right now. Late this night or tomorrow it should be updated. I
will report any issue.
Fabio
2013/1/25 Ethan Schoonover
> Any chance we can get hakyll updated from 3.5 -> 4? I know haskell-core
> automatically updates, but wasn't sure haskell-web is.
>
> http://jaspervdj.be/posts/2
> I've now signed the official repos, both x86_64 and i686. The signing
> will work whether you access it as [haskell] or [haskell-core]. I've
> also signed the database, which means the following kind of entry will
> now work:
>
> [haskell-core]
> SigLevel = Required TrustedOnly
> Server = http:
2012/12/4 Magnus Therning
>
> Yeah, that's my bad. I sometimes start updates and builds in the
> morning and then check in on them during the day. If they succeed I
> push the new packages to the repo, but I only have write access to the
> github repos from my home computer. I always plan to pu
2012/11/30 Fabio Riga :
> I developed [haskell-web] in a way that it will not duplicate packages
> from [haskell]: I use them as DistroPkg. Updating is easy with
> `cbladmin` [^1], there's no need to modify `cblrepo`, maybe you could
> merge (and develop) some ideas from there. Bu
2012/11/30 Magnus Therning
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Ramana Kumar wrote:
> > [haskell] and [haskell-web] are out of sync at the moment.
I would say that github repository of [haskell] is out of sync with
[haskell], so [haskell-web] can't be updated.
> > Do we have a mechanism in plac
Hi all,
a long time ago I wrote about a script to keep a repository of Haskell
packages that depends on [haskell] repo. This script is what helped me
producing [haskell-extra] and now [haskell-web]. In my intentions,
this should permit a group of people to manage relatively small
repository that s
2012/10/20 Fabio Riga :
> Hi all,
>
> for everyone interested, I started porting [haskell-extra] in sync
> with [haskell]. I decided to call it [haskell-web], because
> web-frameworks are the main target. You can use it adding these lines
> in your pacman.conf:
>
> [hask
Hi all,
for everyone interested, I started porting [haskell-extra] in sync
with [haskell]. I decided to call it [haskell-web], because
web-frameworks are the main target. You can use it adding these lines
in your pacman.conf:
[haskell-web]
Server = http://archhaskell.mynerdside.com/$repo/$arch
A
2012/10/18 Mateusz Loskot
> On 13 October 2012 11:20, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> > mloskot ~ $ sudo pacman -Syu
> > ...
> > error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
> > ghc: /usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries/hslogo-16.png exists in filesystem
> > ghc: /usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries
2012/10/13 Ramana Kumar :
> By the way, what's the progress on haskell-extra, and did you find out where
> haskell-old lives (in case haskell-extra still depends on haskell-old)?
Sorry, there is no improvement... Now I have no access to my desktop
with arch linux, so I can't do anything. Please be
2012/10/13 Ramana Kumar
>
> I'm not sure why that error happened but it happened to me too.
The problem seems to be that those files were not part of any package,
but now are in ghc.
> I removed the offending files manually and tried again, and ran into more
> problems (although everything inst
2012/10/12 Magnus Therning
>
> The transition has been made. [haskell-old] will be kept around until
> the missing packages are re-added to [haskell].
Thank you for this. I should have some time in the next week to update
[haskell-extra]. In the meantime, if somebody (like me) have some
package
Alle 20 e 40 del 07/10/12, Magnus Therning si espresse così:
> Since I've now added all the packages you list above, except for
> pandoc, I'll make the push of GHC 7.6 on Wednesday. I plan to move
> [haskell] to [haskell-old] and [haskell-testing] to [haskell]. I'll
> keep [haskell-old] around on
Hi Magnus,
is there a reason for dropping those packages? If some package fail to
build in ghc 7.6 we will lost as well many packages in [haskell-extra].
I'm concerned especially about gtk, pandoc and wai/warp: they are needed
for packages like hakyll, gitit and the yesod suite among others.
If t
In data 25.09.2012 08:17:54, Magnus Therning ha scritto:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Ramana Kumar
wrote:
> Are any of the people with commit access to habs on this list?
> What about merging in habs-extra?
There is a combination of reasons for my reluctance to accept new
packages into HA
In data 24.09.2012 18:14:35, t...@hiddenrock.com ha scritto:
Honestly, I've kinda given up on this group because it seems the
people in
charge don't really care. I've got my own little hackage->pkgbuild
system
running that so far works great for my needs. Once I'm a little more
confident of
In data 19.09.2012 19:22:56, Ramana Kumar ha scritto:
Thanks a lot for this information! Is it written down in any wikis or
other
places where we can learn about [haskell]?
Many information was written in this mailing list, I think you can check
the list archives. The Arch Linux wiki has a pag
In data 20.09.2012 17:34:15, Nicolas Pouillard ha scritto:
Thanks it seems to work great!
Thank you! Please note that this is a test. So expect this to break in
some way.
Can you tell how easy to maintain a repository (cblrepo) on top of the
archhaskell one. I did thought about forking habs b
Alle 15 e 37 del 18/09/12, Ramana Kumar si espresse così:
> I would like you to consider adding http-conduit to the [haskell] repo.
> I have submitted a pull request which does this at archhaskell/habs on
> github.
I maintain a [haskell-extra] repository that include http-conduit. This
repo is buil
The repo resides in my company small server. As it serve primarily for our
Italian website it shouts down during night for saving some CO2 and some
money. I know this is less then ideal, but at the moment I have no choice.
>From USA, you can reach the server until 19.30 and from 0.30. I'm looking
f
2012/7/22 Magnus Therning
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:02:02AM +0200, Fabio Riga wrote:
> > I think the reason behind this flag is the added dependency on
> > blaze-markup. A cabal patch is bigger, but the result is the same. I
> > will send the pull request with the cabal p
ead.
> Cblrepo will pick a configuration of dependencies that can be satisfied,
> however that doesn't happen when running Setup.hs (then the explicit and
> default flags are required). Patching the cabal file is, IMHO, clearer and
> more explicit.
>
> /M
>
> On Jul 21, 2
Hi Magnus,
2012/7/11 Magnus Therning
>
> The latest version of blaze-html either requires a few other updates,
> or breaks other packages at the moment. I can't remember which it is,
> but you can easily see check by attempting to add it using `cblrepo`.
> Settling for an older version of hakyl
Hi everybody,
2012/7/11
>
> I am glad to hear it. Sometimes installing packages with Cabal
> and with the distro packages can make an evil mess.
>
You are right. But I'm not happy with cabal installing *a lot* of different
version of packages. I think that completing the archhaskell repository
Hi archhaskellers!
Long time ago I wrote in this list about the idea of using cblrepo for
maintaining two or more repositories. Well, you can find the results here:
https://github.com/EffeErre/habs-extra .
The main idea is that every needed package already present in haskell repo
is added as a Di
Hi all,
after some time trying to maintain a repository with ghc-7.2 I fell a
little frustrated about the Haskell community in general: ghc developers
release new version as "stable", (7.2 and 7.4) but recommend to use Haskell
Platform. For this reason many packages work with 7.2 (so I suppose the
I'm going to test this in a few days...
Fabio
2011/12/30 Leif Warner
> Leksah won't run on 7.2. Just install haddock (2.9.2) from [community],
> and that message about haddock requiring 7.2 goes away.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Bernardo Barros <
> bernardobarr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Hi,
following a long discussion about ghc version and haskell-platform, I
started a repo builded with ghc-7.2.2. I compiled about 140 packages from
[extra], [community] and [haskell] for the x86_64 arch. Now I'm using this
and all seems okay. If anybody want to have a look here is a copy:
http://
2011/12/30 Magnus Therning
>
> My question only implies that I'd like to access your repo. I don't
> know your level of access to kiwilight (where [haskell] is kept) and
> if your repo had been public already then I could have put it on there
> myself.
>
I've no access to kiwilight. I can put pa
2011/12/29 Magnus Therning
>
> Where do you keep your repo and how complete is it?
It's in my computer! Does your question imply that we can't use the same
server as for [haskell]?
At the moment I built 140 packages from [extra], [community] and [haskell].
Fabio
2011/12/20 Magnus Therning
> Den 20 dec 2011 04:58 skrev "Bernardo Barros" :
>
> > Arch is not a testing distro... And it's not even up to date with
> > Haskell Platform. If you want to "go faster them haskell platform" you
> > will need to work hard with packaging testing and this seems NOT the
2011/12/20 Peter Hercek
> On 12/20/2011 11:20 AM, Piyush P Kurur wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 08:39:51AM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
>>
>>> Den 20 dec 2011 04:23 skrev "Fabio Riga":
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>
Hello,
do we really need profiling for every installed package? We could reduce
compiling time and disk space usage by 1/3rd.
Fabio
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
2011/12/18 Peter Hercek
> On 12/17/2011 11:07 PM, Ethan Schoonover wrote:
>
>> As an end user, I effectively ignore the official Arch Haskell
>> packages as they are so far out of date. I'm also now trying to
>> disregard most of the AUR since I came across that thread. Haskell is
>> starting to
Hi Magnus,
sorry for my late answer on this and for my bad English... I'll try to be
more clear.
IMHO, the ArchHaskell project should be a very big repository with most
up-to-date packages from hackage. Now, it seems to me that you are doing
all the work, so it's not possible for this project to
dated haskell package in AUR as possible, if we can't have all of them in
arch-haskell.
Cheers,
Fabio
2011/11/13 Fabio Riga
> Hello,
>
> 2011/11/12 Magnus Therning
>
>>
>> It would be excellent if more people could work on keeping [haskell]
>> up-to-date
Hello,
2011/11/12 Magnus Therning
>
> It would be excellent if more people could work on keeping [haskell]
> up-to-date :)
>
> However, splitting updating the database and the building of packages
> is likely to be a bit painful. So far my experience is that updating
> packages to a buildable s
repo procedure seems very clean and easy. Great job!
Cheers,
Fabio
Il giorno 20/ott/2011 07:59, "Magnus Therning" ha
scritto:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Fabio Riga wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> some time ago I ...
It's safer to require a specific version si
Hello everybody,
some time ago I helped adding some package in the repo, and was just
starting to understand how to do this when Peter dropped maintaining the
repo in favour of Magnus. Magnus introduced this new method with cblrepo,
that (it seems to me) automate the updating process, so the group
Hi peter,
2011/6/27 Peter Simons :
> why do you assume that your builds would be faster than makeworld?
now that I looked into the scripts, I understand that I'm quite wrong
about time consuming: after the first time, it should be just the
same. Sorry for the silly assumption.
I'll wait for maki
Hi Magnus,
I will also try your tool. Thanks for the advice.
Cheers
Fabio
2011/6/26 Magnus Therning :
> I've written a tool called cblrepo[1] which aims to make it possible
> to maintain a consistent set of packages without having to rebuild
> to find broken dependencies. It is currently not us
Hi Peter,
2011/6/26 Peter Simons :
> > 1) In order to test for broken packages, do I really need to use the
> > makeworld script? I think it would take too much time!
>
> Unfortunately, distributing Haskell packages is a fairly complicated
> affair, mostly because these packages interact with ea
Hi all,
yesterday I submitted a patch to HABS repository just because I met
some out-of-date packages in AUR. Then I read the "story" of this
group in this mailing list and thought that I can give some help. I
think I can take responsibility for a bunch of packages and care for
updates, but I need
62 matches
Mail list logo
