Re: [arch-haskell] Broken box after latest ghc update

2016-03-10 Thread Pierre Radermecker
n Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:10 PM, Leif Warner wrote: The "xmonad" and "xmonad-contrib" are from [community]. Are you using [arch-core]? If so, you'd want to use the "haskell-" prefixed variants: "haskell-xmonad" and "haskell-xmonad-co

[arch-haskell] Broken box after latest ghc update

2016-03-10 Thread Pierre Radermecker
The recent update seems to have broken my box. After cleaning up everything (removing ghc), installing  xmonad and xmonad-contrib will force downgrading some packages (such as haskell-x11). Then trying to install `haskell-stack` would fail. Is this a known problem ? Cheers, ___

Re: [arch-haskell] ghc-mod in repo

2015-05-02 Thread Pierre Radermecker
I assume it is not there because the latest `ghc-mod` hackage release does not compile with ghc-7.10 yet. You can follow the issue here : https://github.com/kazu-yamamoto/ghc-mod/issues/437 Note that the master branch does compile fine so the best option is to `cabal install` at this stage.Be a

Re: [arch-haskell] repo's offline?

2015-03-10 Thread Pierre Radermecker
Yep it is back up ! Thanks On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 2:40 PM, stef204 wrote:   09.03.2015, 14:56, "Pierre Radermecker" : Is it still down ? Cheers,   xsounds working for me nowthanks ___ arch-haskell mailing list ar

Re: [arch-haskell] repo's offline?

2015-03-09 Thread Pierre Radermecker
Is it still down ? Cheers, On Monday, March 9, 2015 11:47 AM, stef204 wrote: > > It's on the server side.  I've just alerted the administrator of the > box so hopefully it'll be up an running again shortly. > > /M > No worries, thanks for the feedback, Magnus. __

Re: [arch-haskell] xsounds.org deprecated or down ?

2014-07-01 Thread Pierre Radermecker
un 2014 05:03, "Pierre Radermecker" wrote: Hi, > > >`xsounds.org` has been down for a few days now. Is it still a correct pointer >for [haskell-core]  ? > > > >Cheers, >___ >arch-haskell mailing list >arc

[arch-haskell] xsounds.org deprecated or down ?

2014-06-30 Thread Pierre Radermecker
Hi, `xsounds.org` has been down for a few days now. Is it still a correct pointer for [haskell-core]  ? Cheers, ___ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell

Re: [arch-haskell] haskell-haddock for GHC 7.8.2-1

2014-04-19 Thread Pierre Radermecker
For info, the issue wiith SublimeHaskell and haddock 2.14 has just been fixed ! On Saturday, April 19, 2014 1:24:34 PM, Pierre Radermecker wrote: As a note, one possible usage is SublimeHaskell (https://github.com/SublimeHaskell/SublimeHaskell) that requires this package for some reasons

Re: [arch-haskell] haskell-haddock for GHC 7.8.2-1

2014-04-19 Thread Pierre Radermecker
As a note, one possible usage is SublimeHaskell (https://github.com/SublimeHaskell/SublimeHaskell) that requires this package for some reasons. Anyhow SublimeHaskell does not support haddock 2.14 yet (https://github.com/SublimeHaskell/SublimeHaskell/issues/130). And previous versions of haddoc

Re: [arch-haskell] Updates and a couple of (temporarily) removals

2013-09-24 Thread Pierre Radermecker
The removal of citeproc-hs is kind of unfortunate because pandoc depends on it. Hopefully it won't be for long. Cheers ___ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell

Re: [arch-haskell] Update of haskell-syb ?

2013-08-21 Thread Pierre Radermecker
>  This is on x86_64 I assume, in which case it is temporary.  Hold out >  an hour or so, I'm already rebuilding. It works now. Thanks !___ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell

[arch-haskell] Update of haskell-syb ?

2013-08-20 Thread Pierre Radermecker
Hello, The update of haskell-core/haskell-syb to 0.4.1-1 [installed: 0.4.0-2] seems to break a lot's of package that still require a version = to  0.4.0-2: error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) :: haskell-aeson: requires haskell-syb=0.4.0-2 :: haskell-buildwrapper

[arch-haskell] Async request

2013-06-29 Thread Pierre Radermecker
Hi, Would it be possible to have async (http://hackage.haskell.org/package/async)  in [haskell-core] It has no dependencies apart from base and stm. Thanks, - Pierre___ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/

Re: [arch-haskell] [haskell-web] & ghc 7.6.3

2013-05-30 Thread Pierre Radermecker
> Do you mean http://hackage.haskell.org/package/lens ? Yes, that would be awesome > Cabal-dev would be nice (it was not in haskell-web). > > Another nice addition would be haskell-pipes when the whole suit is > ready. >Is it only http://hackage.haskell.org/package/pipes or do you mean >the

Re: [arch-haskell] [haskell-web] & ghc 7.6.3

2013-05-29 Thread Pierre Radermecker
  > I am/was also a user of habs-web for roughly two use-cases: >  * haskell programs such as git-annex or notmuch-web [0] that I want >    to build once and install multiple times. Personally I don't think it makes much sense to include "programs" such a yesod or git-annex in [haskell-core] Gi

Re: [arch-haskell] [haskell-web] & ghc 7.6.3

2013-05-29 Thread Pierre Radermecker
However, as far as moving packages goes, it would probably be fine to wait until someone explicitly asks for something that was in web to be made available in core. I would like to ask for haskell-lens. It is not really web based, don't have much dependencies ... I had been surprised to see

Re: [arch-haskell] [haskell-web] & ghc 7.6.3

2013-05-28 Thread Pierre Radermecker
No problem. I have updated the wiki so newcomers don't get lost ;-) From: Fabio Riga To: arch-haskell@haskell.org Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 11:45:14 PM Subject: Re: [arch-haskell] [haskell-web] & ghc 7.6.3 Il 22/05/2013 16:57, Pierre Rader

Re: [arch-haskell] [haskell-web] & ghc 7.6.3

2013-05-22 Thread Pierre Radermecker
-dev in the meanwhile. Cheers, From: Johan Holmquist To: Fabio Riga Cc: Arch Haskell Sent: Monday, May 6, 2013 7:47:56 AM Subject: Re: [arch-haskell] [haskell-web] & ghc 7.6.3 Sounds good =) 2013/5/5 Fabio Riga Il 05/05/2013 11:44, Pi

[arch-haskell] [haskell-web] & ghc 7.6.3

2013-05-05 Thread Pierre Radermecker
Hi, If I am not mistaken, [Haskell-web] is no more in sync with [haskell-core]. For isntance, the package "haskell-lens" cannot be installed with ghc 7.6.3. Can I expect a fix in a couple of days or should I go with cabal in the meanwhile ? Cheers, - Pierre_

Re: [arch-haskell] [haskell-web] Git-Annex Log file ?

2013-04-19 Thread Pierre Radermecker
_ From: Fabio Riga To: Pierre Radermecker Cc: "arch-haskell@haskell.org" Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 5:38:33 PM Subject: Re: [arch-haskell] [haskell-web] Git-Annex Log file ? Sorry, I have no idea... I'm going to look into AUR pkgbuild to find differences Fabio

Re: [arch-haskell] [haskell-web] Update wiki for SigLevel

2013-04-15 Thread Pierre Radermecker
OK, I will take the time to create yet another user account on archlinux.org ;-) Thanks From: Ramana Kumar To: Pierre Radermecker Cc: "arch-haskell@haskell.org" Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 3:57:45 PM Subject: Re: [arch-haskell] [haskell-web] U

[arch-haskell] [haskell-web] Git-Annex Log file ?

2013-04-13 Thread Pierre Radermecker
Hello, I am having weird behavior with git-annex going from the AUR version to the haskell-web repo one (actually going from the 32 bits to the 64 bits one). It might be something that hasn't been  cleaned up correctly. Anyway I don't seem to be able to find the log file ... Nothing on /var/log

[arch-haskell] [haskell-web] Update wiki for SigLevel

2013-04-13 Thread Pierre Radermecker
Hello,  If I am not mistaken, the wiki page guidelinehttps://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Haskell_Package_Guidelines should mention that we need to add something like SigLevel = Optional for [Haskell-web] since the last pacman update (at least when using the new default pacman.config file).  

[arch-haskell] haskell-xmonad currently broken with the latest xorg update ?

2013-03-18 Thread Pierre Radermecker
Hi, I was just wondering why ghc and haskell-xmonad is duplicated in the [haskell-core] repo ? It makes the process rather weak ... If I am not mistaken the last xorg update currently breaks haskell-xmonad. I guess there is a good reason but the [haskell-core] maintainer need now to be able t

Re: [arch-haskell] haskell-safe in [haskell-extra] relies on ghc-7.4.2.1 ?

2012-12-09 Thread Pierre Radermecker
: Ramana Kumar Cc: Pierre Radermecker ; "arch-haskell@haskell.org" Sent: Sunday, December 9, 2012 12:05:46 PM Subject: Re: [arch-haskell] haskell-safe in [haskell-extra] relies on ghc-7.4.2.1 ? Excellent! /M On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Ramana Kumar wrote: > I updated th

[arch-haskell] haskell-safe in [haskell-extra] relies on ghc-7.4.2.1 ?

2012-12-07 Thread Pierre Radermecker
Hi, [haskell] seems to work fine with ghc 7.6.1 (the current ghc version in Arch repos) but my first try with [haskell-extra] has choked: sudo pacman -S haskell-safe resolving dependencies... warning: cannot resolve "ghc=7.4.2-1", a dependency of "haskell-safe" Actually my sole need is to inst