I am very sorry for not having responded to [1]. I had planned to do it,
but forgot about it.
It's cool. I think my previous message conveyed more angst on my part than I
truly feel, so please don't think I'm up in arms about this.
That sounds good, it would however be interesting to find
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Ramana Kumar ram...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Are any of the people with commit access to habs on this list?
What about merging in habs-extra?
There is a combination of reasons for my reluctance to accept new
packages into HABS and [haskell], Fabio points out the
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:47 AM, t...@hiddenrock.com wrote:
What do you mean with they don't care? Why don't you try and help,
instead of reinventing the wheal?
By they don't care, I mean that, over the last two months, the mailing list
has seen only three messages from anyone with commit
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Fabio Riga rifa...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there concrete plans to merge it into the main [haskell] repo (i.e. to
merge habs-extra into habs)?
If not, can we start to make some? What are the blocking factors?
There are no concrete plans. The main blocking
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.orgwrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:47 AM, t...@hiddenrock.com wrote:
What do you mean with they don't care? Why don't you try and help,
instead of reinventing the wheal?
By they don't care, I mean that, over the last two
In data 25.09.2012 08:17:54, Magnus Therning ha scritto:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Ramana Kumar ram...@member.fsf.org
wrote:
Are any of the people with commit access to habs on this list?
What about merging in habs-extra?
There is a combination of reasons for my reluctance to accept
Are any of the people with commit access to habs on this list?
What about merging in habs-extra?
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:39 AM, DeWitt, Michael m...@hackfoolery.com wrote:
On Sep 19, 2012 1:05 PM, Fabio Riga rifa...@gmail.com wrote:
Alle 15 e 37 del 18/09/12, Ramana Kumar si espresse
Are any of the people with commit access to habs on this list?
What about merging in habs-extra?
Honestly, I've kinda given up on this group because it seems the people in
charge don't really care. I've got my own little hackage-pkgbuild system
running that so far works great for my needs.
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:14 PM, t...@hiddenrock.com wrote:
Are any of the people with commit access to habs on this list?
What about merging in habs-extra?
Honestly, I've kinda given up on this group because it seems the people in
charge don't really care. I've got my own little
In data 20.09.2012 17:34:15, Nicolas Pouillard ha scritto:
Thanks it seems to work great!
Thank you! Please note that this is a test. So expect this to break in
some way.
Can you tell how easy to maintain a repository (cblrepo) on top of the
archhaskell one. I did thought about forking habs
In data 19.09.2012 19:22:56, Ramana Kumar ha scritto:
Thanks a lot for this information! Is it written down in any wikis or
other
places where we can learn about [haskell]?
Many information was written in this mailing list, I think you can check
the list archives. The Arch Linux wiki has a
Alle 15 e 37 del 18/09/12, Ramana Kumar si espresse così:
I would like you to consider adding http-conduit to the [haskell] repo.
I have submitted a pull request which does this at archhaskell/habs on
github.
I maintain a [haskell-extra] repository that include http-conduit. This
repo is
Your habs-extra repo works really well. Thanks for making it, and for
mentioning it!
I hope it will get merged soon :)
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Ramana Kumar ram...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Fabio Riga rifa...@gmail.com wrote:
Alle 15 e 37 del 18/09/12,
Dear Arch-Haskell
I would like you to consider adding http-conduit to the [haskell] repo.
I have submitted a pull request which does this at archhaskell/habs on
github.
I would also like to get more involved in maintaining haskell packages and
adding more of them.
Is there a plan or roadmap or
14 matches
Mail list logo
