What exactly is the unclear problem? Signalling the process of patching,
or how the patching process works?
--
SP
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http
On 05/11/14 08:35, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Silly me! There's a rather obvious work-around that will allow me
> updating while working on a more convenient way to deal with this.
How are you doing it in the end?
--
SP
___
a
` so it can deal with the
> situation more intelligently.
What is coming up?
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
Would you like some server space? What access do you need? Or maybe as a
mirror meanwhile?
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
On 11/03/2015 16:56, Magnus Therning wrote:
> It'd be nice with a mirror. It should be possible to create one using
> rsync. The entry on the xsounds server looks like this: [..]
What is the entry for?
PS: First time I'm doing this, looking at the rsync script just now.
--
Stavros
___
On 12/03/2015 09:18, Magnus Therning wrote:
> If you feel confident enough with it then feel free to add it to the
> Wiki page[1].
I need to test it on Tuesday and then I will add it.
--
Stavros
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.or
ux.org/index.php/ArchHaskell#.5Bhaskell-core.5D
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
On 17/03/15 12:24, Magnus Therning wrote:
> I received a notification about the edit; it looks perfect to me.
> Thanks for setting this up!
You are welcome. Thanks for setting up the original repo :)
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing lis
What about ARM?
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
ems to be in the avant-garde.
https://ghcarm.wordpress.com/
I have a person interest in this but not pursued it. Maybe with some
collaboration it would become more expedient. Are you interested?
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@
If you do clear the cache as Nicola suggested and you still have
problems, please also tell us which mirror you are using.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch
On 13/04/15 18:26, Skottish wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 06:37:25AM -0700, Skottish wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:31:12AM +0100, SP wrote:
>>> If you do clear the cache as Nicola suggested and you still have
>>> problems, please also tell us which mirror you a
give. I didn't see
anything against it in the packaging standards. We can liaise with the
core team to find out the Arch-y way for this issue.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
, a solution they agree
is in line with Arch. This way we will also be following a path of least
surprise for us, in case they decide in the future to work scenarios
like ours differently.
Who knows.. in a future where everything is running on Haskell,
ArchHaskell might need to
the PKGBUILD files?
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
he end there is always the patch approach for rogues.
- --
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
base_I5BErHzyOm07EBNpKBEeUv/libHSbase-4.8.0.0-I5BErHzyOm07EBNpKBEeUv.a
27632384
/usr/lib/ghc-7.10.1/site-local/texmath-0.8.0.2/libHStexmath-0.8.0.2-1UuTXL14IBUBNFTO6p9bK5_p.a
25808360
/usr/lib/ghc-7.10.1/site-local/highlighting-kate-0.5.14/libHShighlighting-kate-0.5.14-5S9jZ1dVOgcGI7Xst
t; doesn't exist (use
--force to override)
I can install them manually, but should I have to?
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
On 23/04/15 16:46, Skottish wrote:
> pacman -Q haskell-regex-tdfa
haskell-regex-tdfa 1.2.0-76
But this is me after having a go at installing and reinstalling various
alleged missing dependencies.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
a
a bug too. To keep the storage usage down I tend to clean out
> old packages rather aggressively, so make sure to update your repo
> data (`pacman -Sy`) often.
What are the commands for reinstalling all of ArchHaskell based packages?
--
SP
___
ttp://is.gd/O3HkZN).
Yeah that was ok.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
crypto-numbers-0.2.3-6-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz:
Unrecognized archive format
[...]
Goes on, but errors regarding haskell packages are that it could not
open file. maybe something else had gone wrong.. Still researching.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing lis
-force to override)
So I guess this is how to reproduce the issue. Not sure if it a bug or
something I should be doing after reinstalling the _ghc_ package.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
aybe there is a pacman flag to disallow a package from
reinstalling if there are such installation order dependencies.
> I'd also suggest you clean out any locally installed packages (e.g.
> via `cabal install`).
Will do.
--
SP
___
s the whole set
of haskell-* packages then unusable? Cause that seemed to be the effect
it had on me.
This is the issue I was trying to discuss here. Can you see what happens
if you reinstall ghc?
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arc
omehow after ghc is reinstalled.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
ue than inside the ghc package.
I mentioned it in a previous email. I told packman to install
`haskell-base` because the Setup complained `base` was missing.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell
as I have
reinstalled it. Sorry..
Maybe it will happen again.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
more to the left the closer
to the upstream and feature-set.
Combining xrev and pkgrel in a singe integer somehow is feasible but
seems hack-ish and probably will need to get changed again in the future.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-
Can we have HsQML added to the repo?
Thanks!
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
. GHC is about a
gigabyte by itself plus all the other packages. The mirror will have to
download all the updated packages, plus upload to users updating from
that mirror.
I speculate it will be several gigabytes a month.
--
SP
___
arch-haskell mailing l
31 matches
Mail list logo
