On 01/07/2018 10:55 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> Not really sure what the issue is, are we actually in violation of
> anything, and if so what? For example, quickly googling for konami.js
> shows me several github repos that *all* claim to be MIT licensed.
Morten Linderud pointed out on IRC that it
On 01/07/2018 10:12 AM, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> What's the status of this after our last message here?
>
> I have some questions that you can ask the ArchLinux meetings in order
> help solve this:
>
> 1. For things provided by the ArchLinux project and which have the
>problematic
What's the status of this after our last message here?
I have some questions that you can ask the ArchLinux meetings in order
help solve this:
1. For things provided by the ArchLinux project and which have the
problematic licenses, has ArchLinux agreed license change?
Rephrasing the
