On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 06:10:08 -0500,
Bruno Pagani via arch-projects wrote:
> > Call me a simp, but can't we just maintain a list of subvolumes to
> > delete? For now it's just one item.
>
> I think this is the most reasonable thing to do right now, and keep it
> that way as long as the item list
Le 16/02/2017 à 08:54, Bartłomiej Piotrowski a écrit :
> On 2017-02-10 10:16, Jan Alexander Steffens via arch-projects wrote:
>> The chroot management is getting so complex I wonder if we're not better
>> off killing the btrfs support (it doesn't buy us much over rsync since
>> the base (root)
On 2017-02-10 10:16, Jan Alexander Steffens via arch-projects wrote:
> The chroot management is getting so complex I wonder if we're not better
> off killing the btrfs support (it doesn't buy us much over rsync since
> the base (root) chroot tends to be small) or using someone's else
> container
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:57:32 -0500,
Dave Reisner wrote:
> > + LC_ALL=C btrfs subvolume show "$1" | sed -n 's/^\tSubvolume ID:\s*//p'
>
> This looks like you're parsing human readable output to get the subvol
> ID. Is this really the only way to get this information?
As far as I can tell, yes.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 03:46:08AM -0500, luke...@lukeshu.com wrote:
> From: Luke Shumaker
>
> Motivation:
>
> When installing the necessaryssary dependencies in the chroot, the
> ALPM hooks run; and if 'systemd' is a dependency, then one of the
> hooks is to run
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:46 AM wrote:
> From: Luke Shumaker
>
> Motivation:
>
> When installing the necessaryssary dependencies in the chroot, the
> ALPM hooks run; and if 'systemd' is a dependency, then one of the
> hooks is to run
From: Luke Shumaker
Motivation:
When installing the necessaryssary dependencies in the chroot, the
ALPM hooks run; and if 'systemd' is a dependency, then one of the
hooks is to run systemd-tmpfiles. There are several tmpfiles.d(5)
commands that instruct it to