On 02/20/2018 12:24 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Seems like I wasn't clear enough:
> The goal is not to appease zsh - but a step closer to POSIX sh friendly.
>
> I've been staring and writing bash (closer to POSIX sh really) scripts
> for over a decade, haven't seen what makes X cleaner over Y.
> Yet
On 20 February 2018 at 14:23, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 02/20/2018 06:59 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> Disclaimer: the following is a bit subtle topic, so I hope it doesn't
>> spur a lot of off-topic.
>
> Eh, I don't mind.
>
>> Is there any performance or other technical benefit to using more bashisms
On 02/20/2018 06:59 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Disclaimer: the following is a bit subtle topic, so I hope it doesn't
> spur a lot of off-topic.
Eh, I don't mind.
> Is there any performance or other technical benefit to using more bashisms?
>
> Reason being, that I am slowly going through differen
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:59:49AM +, Emil Velikov via arch-projects wrote:
> Hi Eli,
>
> Disclaimer: the following is a bit subtle topic, so I hope it doesn't
> spur a lot of off-topic.
>
> On 19 February 2018 at 20:11, Eli Schwartz via arch-projects
> wrote:
> > Catch some cases that were
Hi Eli,
Disclaimer: the following is a bit subtle topic, so I hope it doesn't
spur a lot of off-topic.
On 19 February 2018 at 20:11, Eli Schwartz via arch-projects
wrote:
> Catch some cases that were missed in the previous run.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz
> ---
>
> This patch is new + refac
Catch some cases that were missed in the previous run.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz
---
This patch is new + refactor some changes from:
ftpdir-cleanup,sourceballs: replace external find command with bash globbing
cron-jobs/devlist-mailer | 6 +++---
cron-jobs/ftpdir-cleanup | 14 +++-