Hi David, I have posted a question related to this in the Arches developer
forum in case you are interested:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/arches-dev/VRk2ws0yMbo
Adam
On Tuesday, March 3, 2020 at 9:02:28 AM UTC-6, David Osborne wrote:
>
> Hi Alison
>
> Thanks for your reply and
Hi Alison
Thanks for your reply and explaining the background to the Arches/Arc
integration project. We will all have our own priorities so my comments
were not meant to be unappreciative of the development. I applaud Historic
England for helping to fund the initiative, particularly if it
Greetings David. I should have replied to you (and Alina) a long time ago.
My apologies.
You make an excellent point David, and I would venture to say that most of
us agree with you--i.e., that our priority should be to develop integration
with other open-source rather than proprietary tools.
Hi David,
Thanks so much for your feedback on the roadmap. I imagine there will be
many discussions/conversations in the coming weeks/months about this new
ArcGIS
integration development. I'll ask others to chime in here too, because
I'm certain there have been thoughts and considerations
Hi Alina
The developments in the roadmap look interesting, especially, for me, the
science applications. However, I must admit disappointment that ArcGIS has
been chosen in preference to QGIS for the GIS interface. I expect there
will be several projects which were attracted to Arches due to
