Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [Pet Project] Velocity Template Mediator for ESB

Hi Asanka, you can send your PR to master branch. On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Asanka Dissanayake wrote: > Thanks Chanaka, will do. > What is the branch I should send the pull request ? > > Thanks, > Asanka D > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Chanaka Fernando > wrote: > >> Hi Asanka, >

Re: [Architecture] Session Affinity Alternatives

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Srinath Perera wrote: > Hi Frank, > > Proposal is when the session parameter has changed, framework (e.g. > Servelt runtime, or MSS framework) will write the update to the disk > asynchronsly. > > Since we are a middleware platform, impact of losing a session dep

Re: [Architecture] [BPS][BPMN] Extending Support to Implement SOAP Task to invoke SOAP Services

Hi Natasha, Lets try with CXF. According to the documentation, there is a dynamic client capabilty with CXF. Can you give it a try. http://cxf.apache.org/docs/dynamic-clients.html Regards Nandika On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Natasha Wijesekara wrote: > Hi All, > > I tried implementing a S

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [BPS] Rendering information of the current task of a BPMN process instance

Hi Dilini, How are you fetching information about tasks in the current implementation? Activiti REST API provides support for fetching task related information. If we don't have it currently in our new REST API, we can add similar methods to it. Regards, Chathura On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:18 AM,

[Architecture] WSO2 Carbon JNDI - 1.0.0-M1 Released

Hi all, Please note $subject. You may install carbon-jndi feature to your product with: org.wso2.carbon.jndi org.wso2.carbon.jndi.feature 1.0.0-m1 Please refer [1] for instructions on using carbon-jndi with your client bundle. [1] https://github.com/wso2/carbon-jndi/tree/v1.0.0-m1 Thanks, Nip

Re: [Architecture] [PET] Improvement on Redmine connector

Hi Malaka, I have checked the redmine connector methods[1] with API documentation[2] for whether all parameters support or not. I have found that, all implemented methods support for all of the available parameters. As we discussed in the meeting we no need to implement alpha methods. WDYT? [1]

Re: [Architecture] [APIM Analytics][Docs] Documentation space for APIM Analytics

I share the same view as Jackie. A certain task maybe performed with or without tooling. Both methods should be described in the same section. Analytics is better off having a section of its own under a main heading. On 16 March 2016 at 02:20, Jackie Wheeler wrote: > If I understand the scope