Re: [Architecture] Using Kubernetes ConfigMaps for Managing Product Configurations

2017-09-04 Thread Youcef HILEM
Hi Imesh, That's what I was looking for. Before this solution, to avoid creating as many docker images as environments and components, and taking into account the current limit (https://github.com/wso2/kubernetes-apim/issues/15), I planned to use the solution

[Architecture] Using Kubernetes ConfigMaps for Managing Product Configurations

2017-09-04 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
Hi All, It seems that Kubernetes ConfigMaps can be used for managing product configurations without having to build Docker images for each pattern with specific configurations. This was recently tested with Enterprise Integrator and its K8S resources used can be found below:

Re: [Architecture] C5 Configuration Lookup from Environment Variables

2017-09-04 Thread Niranjan Karunanandham
[Adding Chamila] On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Niranjan Karunanandham wrote: > Hi Chamila, > > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Chamila De Alwis > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please find the meeting notes below. >> >> 1. The existing approach where resorting to

Re: [Architecture] C5 Configuration Lookup from Environment Variables

2017-09-04 Thread Niranjan Karunanandham
Hi Chamila, On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Chamila De Alwis wrote: > Hi, > > Please find the meeting notes below. > > 1. The existing approach where resorting to the deployment.yaml file to > figure out lookup hierarchy would be dropped. > 2. Instead, the lookup hierarchy

Re: [Architecture] C5 Configuration Lookup from Environment Variables

2017-09-04 Thread Chamila De Alwis
Agree. The completed description of how configuration lookup happens should be properly documented, and our production guidelines should contain the recommendations for each deployment scenario. Regards, Chamila de Alwis Committer and PMC Member - Apache Stratos Senior Software Engineer | WSO2

Re: [Architecture] C5 Configuration Lookup from Environment Variables

2017-09-04 Thread Bhathiya Jayasekara
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Chamila De Alwis wrote: > Hi Bhathiya, > > Yes, this is an important point. However, I don't think we'd need to > handle the order for the non-Container scenario specifically, as it would > complicate the implementation too much. IMO config