Re: [Architecture] Project 240: Communication channel between API Providers and API Consumers

2018-10-02 Thread Wasura Wattearachchi
Hi Pubudu, In point 1 - The comment owner should be able to edit his comment. +1 for that. - IMHO, I think it is better if we consider the Entry Point. For example, let's say there are two Peters (username). One is a Publisher and the other one is a Consumer. So if we did not check

Re: [Architecture] [APIM 3.0.0] get rid of relational databases (MySQL, ...)

2018-10-02 Thread Youcef HILEM
Hi Uvindra, I come back to this topic because it is of great importance for us to have our multicloud deployment of wso2 APIM Cassandra with NoSQL bases to overcome all sync problems with MySQL. Could you provide an implementation of DAOs

Re: [Architecture] Project 240: Communication channel between API Providers and API Consumers

2018-10-02 Thread Pubudu Gunatilaka
Hi Wasura, On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 12:20 PM Wasura Wattearachchi wrote: > > Ok sure. > I have a doubt to be clarified. When editing a comment, we already have a > mechanism to check whether the particular person has the *comment > moderator* role. If so we give permission to update the comment.

Re: [Architecture] Project 240: Communication channel between API Providers and API Consumers

2018-10-02 Thread Wasura Wattearachchi
Ok sure. I have a doubt to be clarified. When editing a comment, we already have a mechanism to check whether the particular person has the *comment moderator* role. If so we give permission to update the comment. But if the user does not have the comment moderator role, we need a mechanism to