Hi Darshana,
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 8:29 PM Darshana Gunawardana
wrote:
> Hi Johann,
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 10:43 AM Johann Nallathamby
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Thanuja,
>>
>> Did we consider sending the access token itself as a secure, http-only
>> cookie to the browser instead of binding it to
Hi Prakhash,
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:34 PM Prakhash Sivakumar
wrote:
> Hi Johann,
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 7:13 AM Johann Nallathamby
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Thanuja,
>>
>> Did we consider sending the access token itself as a secure, http-only
>> cookie to the browser instead of binding it to a
Hi all,
Today we had a review meeting[1] to finalize the swagger API definition[2].
Please find the meeting notes below.
*Participants:* +Thanuja Jayasinghe +Isura Karunaratne
+Tharindu Bandara
*Notes:*
- *[GET] : /me/associations *
- This API returns a list of associated users.
Hi Darshana,
Why do we need the,
>
>- [POST] : /{user-id}/federated-associations
>
> The same API is available for the local account association. Now for
the federated account scenario, we grant this capability to an admin user,
as an admin API.
We cannot provide a */me *API for this
Hi Isura\Tharindu,
Why do we need the,
>
>
>- [POST] : /{user-id}/federated-associations
>
>
Thanks,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:00 AM Tharindu Bandara
wrote:
> Hi Isura,
>
> I think this API is not required. If this is supported, anyone can
>> associate federated accounts without
