If we take other matrices such as CPU, memory etc this service will be too
complicate IMO. That feature is anyway there with JVM matrices in C4
product family. When it comes to C5 based product i think we will still
have some utility for that as well. So we will not need to worry too much
about
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Lakmal Warusawithana
wrote:
> +1, this should go with v3.
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Pubudu Gunatilaka
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Shall we prioritize this feature and add this to APIM 3.0.0 GA? IMO, this
>> is more
+1, this should go with v3.
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Pubudu Gunatilaka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shall we prioritize this feature and add this to APIM 3.0.0 GA? IMO, this
> is more useful to have as we have more focus towards containers.
>
> Thank you!
>
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017
Hi,
Shall we prioritize this feature and add this to APIM 3.0.0 GA? IMO, this
is more useful to have as we have more focus towards containers.
Thank you!
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Bhathiya Jayasekara
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Imesh Gunaratne
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Nuwan Dias wrote:
>
>>
>> 2) The gateway interceptors should ignore requests to this endpoint. i.e,
>> security, throttling, analytics, etc should be ignored.
>>
>
>
[+Kishanthana, Niranjan]
On C4, Server Monitoring was available through JMX[1]. Not sure about C5.
I think health-check should be platform wide available rather than
implementing product wise.
[1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/Carbon440/JMX-based+Monitoring#
5a2eb613d9dc4b2ca6b71047aca4effa
On
I too think that health check deals with more metrics such as cpu, memory
and heap usage usage etc.
May be this health check capability could consider exposing an API to get
the gateway (or for any product for that matter) metrics of memory, cpu
usage and database connections etc.
On Mon, Mar
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Nuwan Dias wrote:
>
> 2) The gateway interceptors should ignore requests to this endpoint. i.e,
> security, throttling, analytics, etc should be ignored.
>
Wouldn't this allow to perform DoS attacks on the gateway if no
interceptors are applied?
Hi,
There can be many metrics to be considered when determining the health such
as memory usage, cpu usage/load average, database connections etc...
Basically it should tell that gateway is ready to server requests.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Lakmal Warusawithana
wrote:
>
Ideally we should introduce generic way to every product. At the moment we
are calling carbon/admin/login.jsp as health check endpoint. Special in GW
is there is no such thing.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Bhathiya Jayasekara
wrote:
> Shouldn't we have a similar health
Shouldn't we have a similar health check for key managers as well?
Thanks,
Bhathiya
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Lakmal Warusawithana
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Nuwan Dias wrote:
>
>> Yes, its useful to have it. What this requires is a
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Nuwan Dias wrote:
> Yes, its useful to have it. What this requires is a pre-defined service to
> be shipped with the Gateway. The following needs to be considered for that
> service.
>
> 1) The service context (path) should be preserved. We
Yes, its useful to have it. What this requires is a pre-defined service to
be shipped with the Gateway. The following needs to be considered for that
service.
1) The service context (path) should be preserved. We shouldn't allow APIs
to be added with that context.
2) The gateway interceptors
+1
Other than sending back 200, I think it would be helpful if there is
another configuration to make the health check API, call a given backend
(which returns 200) and respond to the original caller.
The advantage of having this is, we can have a rough idea about the full
flow. e.g. is traffic
Hi,
When we deploying api gateway in container management system (or even
fronted by ELB) we need to have a health check end point to configure.
Since gateway only going pass through we don't have such at the moment.
Shall we do $subject? it should only return 200
thanks
--
Lakmal
15 matches
Mail list logo