For viewing, shall we use a single scope: apim:mediation_policy_view
But, it make sense to have the apim:api_view scope to view mediation
policies of an api IMO
If not, a user with apim:api_view scope can see the api but unable to see
the mediation policies due to missing
Hi Ishara,
+1 for the overall approach.
For viewing, shall we use a single scope: apim:mediation_policy_view
Also for the tag: shall we simplify as "Mediation Policies"
Thanks!
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:18 PM Ishara Cooray wrote:
> Hi,
> I have started working on the $Subject and below is
Hi,
I have started working on the $Subject and below is the rest api
definitions.
- To avoid string manipulations, Mediation policy post is done as a file
upload. Hence we can provide the sequence file(xml content) as an input in
the form of multipart/form-data
ex:
curl -X POST
