Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [ESB] Deprecated features in ESB 4.10

2016-06-29 Thread Kasun Indrasiri
Shall we finalize the things that are going to deprecate in ESB 5? ___ Architecture mailing list Architecture@wso2.org https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [ESB] Deprecated features in ESB 4.10

2015-12-17 Thread Isuru Udana
Hi Amila, On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Amila Maha Arachchi wrote: > Have you seen *Enqueue* and *RMSequence* mediators being used when > implementing mediation logics? > We have already removed RMSequence mediator in 4.9.0. I haven't seen anyone using Enqueue Mediator in a

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [ESB] Deprecated features in ESB 4.10

2015-12-16 Thread Kathees Rajendram
Hi Kasun/Isuru, Yes, we will verify the NTLM use cases with call mediator blocking behavior and do more comparison before deprecate in 4.10. Yes, we use same blocking sender. Thanks, Kathees On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Cyril Rognon wrote: > Hi > > DB mediator can

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [ESB] Deprecated features in ESB 4.10

2015-12-15 Thread Kasun Indrasiri
@Kathees : Can we verify NTLM use cases with Call mediator + blocking behavior? I guess it should work out of box as we also reuse the same blocking sender code? For DB* mediators, I guess we can clearly mention in the docs that these mediators can be only used for very limited kind of DB

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [ESB] Deprecated features in ESB 4.10

2015-12-15 Thread Cyril Rognon
Hi DB mediator can be handy as you said but it is a bad practice to query the DB right from the Esb. It is against the low coupling principles that makes integration layer agile and thin and scalable etc. DSS is setup in two minutes and can fulfill your needs out of the box. Maybe we

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [ESB] Deprecated features in ESB 4.10

2015-12-09 Thread Yumani Ranaweera
Is it possible to provide sufficient documentation to help the customers who would be migrating in future. Thanks, Yumani On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Chanaka Fernando wrote: > *- Callout mediator :* > All the callout functionality is supported with 'call' mediator with

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [ESB] Deprecated features in ESB 4.10

2015-12-09 Thread Kasun Indrasiri
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Malaka Silva wrote: > +1 except DBReport/DBLookup mediators > > DBReport and DBLookup only offer a very limited set of capabilities. IMO, for any real integration scenario, we can't use them. :). > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Yumani

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [ESB] Deprecated features in ESB 4.10

2015-12-09 Thread Malaka Silva
In my experience using ​DB mediator we can cover some of the use cases using ESB out of the box, which I find very handy. Also use case of integrating with stored procs can easily covered with this. However there are limits like batch update or getting multiple rows. ​I guess we can argue both

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [ESB] Deprecated features in ESB 4.10

2015-12-09 Thread Malaka Silva
IMO best option in that case is have connectors supporting different spring versions, similar to what we are doing for EJBs. Having a mediator will only limit for single version. On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Maheeka Jayasuriya wrote: > Hi, > > I've observed spring

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [ESB] Deprecated features in ESB 4.10

2015-12-09 Thread Maheeka Jayasuriya
Hi, I've observed spring mediator being used extensively in situations where maintaining the domain model useful (class mediators are the alternative with a POJO domain model). This allows maintainability and is easily extensible. However, Spring mediator right now does not explore best of Spring