I think its better to merge these first and then compare with the CGI list.
I don't think we're missing many on that list.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Uvindra Dias Jayasinha
wrote:
> Hi Rukshan,
>
> There have been requests in the past to include all available CGI
>
Hi Rukshan,
There have been requests in the past to include all available CGI
variables[1] to give more flexibility when it comes to stats. We are
already capturing some of these above. I dont know for sure how useful or
relevant it might be to capture them all though.
[1]