On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Sagara Gunathunga wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Johann Nallathamby
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Ishara Karunarathna
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In SCIM domain is used to represent the whole administrative
>>> provisioning
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Johann Nallathamby wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Ishara Karunarathna
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In SCIM domain is used to represent the whole administrative provisioning
>> system . So I don't think domain discuss in the spec directly map to the
>> do
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Ishara Karunarathna
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In SCIM domain is used to represent the whole administrative provisioning
> system . So I don't think domain discuss in the spec directly map to the
> domain concept we have.
>
> In the spec when defining the tenants they have t
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Ishara Karunarathna
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In SCIM domain is used to represent the whole administrative provisioning
>> system . So I don't think domain discuss in the spec directly map to the
>> dom
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Ishara Karunarathna
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In SCIM domain is used to represent the whole administrative provisioning
> system . So I don't think domain discuss in the spec directly map to the
> domain concept we have.
>
We are not discussing here provisioning system (dom
Hi,
In SCIM domain is used to represent the whole administrative provisioning
system . So I don't think domain discuss in the spec directly map to the
domain concept we have.
In the spec when defining the tenants they have the option to use tenant
domain as a path parameter or sub domain.
A URL
Hi,
According to SCIM protocol specification[1], SCIM service providers may
support additional query parameters apart from the standard set of query
parameters in querying resources. Hence +1 for what Gayan has proposed here.
I also agree with what Omindu has proposed. I think we could even add t
Hi Gayan,
Does the protocol permits introducing custom parameters as domain? If so
+1 for using a param. Else, we can include the domain name as a part of
the username (IINM we support this in C4 as well), so searching only in a
particular domain will look like below.
/scim/v2/Users?filter=userN
Hi Gayan,
When it comes to SCIM, is there a attribute called 'domain' already?
In C5, is there something like fully qualified name (i.e. domain/username)
as in C4, or this domain thing in C5 is completely different thing?
If we are to implement one of few of the queries you have suggested above,
Hi All,
How are we going to support SCIM list all users and list all groups
operations when we have multiple user store domains. In C4 we could iterate
through all user stores and fetch results but in C5 we highly discourage
such a functionality due to performance impact.
Basically client need to
10 matches
Mail list logo
