Re: [Architecture] Common Extension Framework for IS Authenticators

2016-11-10 Thread Kathees Rajendram
Yes, this is a temporary solution. We should add to the IS framework. On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Malaka Silva wrote: > Yes we should do that. > > @Kathees - Did we create a redmine for this already? > Yes, there are redmines in IS for "Federated support of 2nd factor authenticators" [1],

Re: [Architecture] Common Extension Framework for IS Authenticators

2016-11-10 Thread Malaka Silva
Yes we should do that. @Kathees - Did we create a redmine for this already? On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Harsha Thirimanna wrote: > Hi all, > Let's consider these common stuff to the connectors as a part of the > framework itself, because now connector team pack this common code module > wi

Re: [Architecture] Common Extension Framework for IS Authenticators

2016-11-09 Thread Harsha Thirimanna
Hi all, Let's consider these common stuff to the connectors as a part of the framework itself, because now connector team pack this common code module with each connector and duplicate with each. From C5 onward we can remove that from connector level and provide it from framework. WDYT ? On Nov 8,

Re: [Architecture] Common Extension Framework for IS Authenticators

2016-11-08 Thread Kathees Rajendram
The common module is released with federated authenticator support in multi factor authentication, locking user while applying wrong code in other steps and tenant based configuration for application authentication xml file. Thanks, Kathees On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Kathees Rajendram wrot

Re: [Architecture] Common Extension Framework for IS Authenticators

2016-11-04 Thread Kathees Rajendram
Hi Malaka, This is the common module [1] for the authenticators. I will release to the nexus by Monday. [1] - https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-extension-utils Thanks, Kathees On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Malaka Silva wrote: > Hi Kathees, > > Did we release this? If not please up

Re: [Architecture] Common Extension Framework for IS Authenticators

2016-11-03 Thread Malaka Silva
Hi Kathees, Did we release this? If not please update once done.. On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:51 AM, Malaka Silva wrote: > My understanding here is what we try to do here is getting generic methods > (Utils) to a common module. Nothing more. > > Dynamic sequence is something that should be support

Re: [Architecture] Common Extension Framework for IS Authenticators

2016-10-07 Thread Malaka Silva
My understanding here is what we try to do here is getting generic methods (Utils) to a common module. Nothing more. Dynamic sequence is something that should be supported from IS product framework in the future. On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Harsha Thirimanna wrote: > This is kind of dynami

Re: [Architecture] Common Extension Framework for IS Authenticators

2016-10-07 Thread Harsha Thirimanna
This is kind of dynamic sequence bases on different factors like per user , per group , right ? Do you guys have concrete plan for this ? Then shall we discuss this design before jump to the code ? *Harsha Thirimanna* Associate Tech Lead | WSO2 Email: hars...@wso2.com Mob: +94715186770 Blog: http

Re: [Architecture] Common Extension Framework for IS Authenticators

2016-10-06 Thread Kathees Rajendram
Thanks for the comments and suggestions. The subject may be mislead. We need to create a utility component with common use cases. Basically we are providing generalized component and the common use cases are applicable for most of authenticators. As you said, alternative authentication flow is no

Re: [Architecture] Common Extension Framework for IS Authenticators

2016-10-06 Thread Ishara Karunarathna
Hi Malaka. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Malaka Silva wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Ishara Karunarathna > wrote: > >> Hi Malaka. >> >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Malaka Silva wrote: >> >>> Hi Ishara, >>> >>> I guess the subject is bit misleading. What we are trying to a

Re: [Architecture] Common Extension Framework for IS Authenticators

2016-10-05 Thread Malaka Silva
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Ishara Karunarathna wrote: > Hi Malaka. > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Malaka Silva wrote: > >> Hi Ishara, >> >> I guess the subject is bit misleading. What we are trying to achieve >> here is to put common functionalities used by all / most of the IS >> ext

Re: [Architecture] Common Extension Framework for IS Authenticators

2016-10-05 Thread Ishara Karunarathna
Hi Malaka. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Malaka Silva wrote: > Hi Ishara, > > I guess the subject is bit misleading. What we are trying to achieve > here is to put common functionalities used by all / most of the IS > extensions. > > For example we have done a improvement to totp to support mu

Re: [Architecture] Common Extension Framework for IS Authenticators

2016-10-05 Thread Malaka Silva
Hi Ishara, I guess the subject is bit misleading. What we are trying to achieve here is to put common functionalities used by all / most of the IS extensions. For example we have done a improvement to totp to support multi tenancy. These logic's are built into totp and that is wrong. So we are pl

Re: [Architecture] Common Extension Framework for IS Authenticators

2016-10-05 Thread Ishara Karunarathna
Hi kathees, On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Kathees Rajendram wrote: > Hi All, > > I am working on creating common extension framework for IS authenticators. > Can you explain more on this. What is the existing problem and how its going to fix this framework. At the moment we have authenticatio

[Architecture] Common Extension Framework for IS Authenticators

2016-10-05 Thread Kathees Rajendram
Hi All, I am working on creating common extension framework for IS authenticators. In extension common framework, I am planing to add the following features which can be reused in authenticators. - Federated authenticator support - Currently, two-factor authenticator supports basic authent