Re: [Architecture] Leveraging Product Profiles with Carbon 4.2

2013-07-31 Thread Sameera Perera
Can we create aPaaS, iPaaS, API, Mobile etc. profiles for App Factory? We've initially thought of these as App Types and solution bundles. Sounds like profiles makes much more sense (though Integration, API, etc. App Types will still be present). On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Afkham Azeez wro

Re: [Architecture] Leveraging Product Profiles with Carbon 4.2

2013-07-31 Thread Afkham Azeez
It is good to think about profiles at a product level. It is also possible to "host" new profiles after we ship the product. For example, let's say we come across a use case or customer scenario where a subset of the features is needed in certain runtimes. We can create profiles for that. We also n

Re: [Architecture] Leveraging Product Profiles with Carbon 4.2

2013-07-31 Thread Kasun Gajasinghe
Yes.. How about the following. I think we should use singular names as the profile names. 1. Web apps - webapp 2. Services - axis2service 3. DS - dataservice 4. Jaggery -jaggery 5. MS - mashup On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Kasun Gajasinghe wrote: > >> Yes. The list

Re: [Architecture] Leveraging Product Profiles with Carbon 4.2

2013-07-31 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Kasun Gajasinghe wrote: > Yes. The list is as follows. > > 1. Web apps > 2. Services > 2. DS > 4. Jaggery > 5. MS > We might want to use some meaningful names here rather than these abbreviations. > Thanks, > KasunG > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Isur

Re: [Architecture] Leveraging Product Profiles with Carbon 4.2

2013-07-30 Thread Kasun Gajasinghe
Yes. The list is as follows. 1. Web apps 2. Services 2. DS 4. Jaggery 5. MS Thanks, KasunG On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Isuru Perera wrote: > Hi Kasun, > > Will you be able to list the Application Server profiles here since not > everyone has access to given link. > > Thanks! > > > On We

Re: [Architecture] Leveraging Product Profiles with Carbon 4.2

2013-07-30 Thread Isuru Perera
Hi Kasun, Will you be able to list the Application Server profiles here since not everyone has access to given link. Thanks! On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Kasun Gajasinghe wrote: > > AS will be providing following profiles. - > https://redmine.wso2.com/issues/890 > > Thanks, > KasunG > >

Re: [Architecture] Leveraging Product Profiles with Carbon 4.2

2013-07-30 Thread Kasun Gajasinghe
AS will be providing following profiles. - https://redmine.wso2.com/issues/890 Thanks, KasunG On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Ajith Vitharana wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We were thinking about the same in the context of G-Reg. W

Re: [Architecture] Leveraging Product Profiles with Carbon 4.2

2013-07-30 Thread Ajith Vitharana
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Senaka Fernando wrote: > Hi all, > > We were thinking about the same in the context of G-Reg. We can have: > > 1. Repository Profile (what is typically used when G-Reg is used with > products like ESB with mounting in place). > 2. Governance Profile (the complete

Re: [Architecture] Leveraging Product Profiles with Carbon 4.2

2013-07-30 Thread Senaka Fernando
Hi all, We were thinking about the same in the context of G-Reg. We can have: 1. Repository Profile (what is typically used when G-Reg is used with products like ESB with mounting in place). 2. Governance Profile (the complete G-Reg profile) WDYT? Thanks, Senaka. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:51

[Architecture] Leveraging Product Profiles with Carbon 4.2

2013-07-30 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
Profiles support is a major feature that comes with Carbon 4.2.0. What I understood from the stand-up meetings we had on Carbon release progress yesterday is that, products have not yet thought about properly making use of this feature. Front end / back end separation is just "scratching the surf