Can we create aPaaS, iPaaS, API, Mobile etc. profiles for App Factory?
We've initially thought of these as App Types and solution bundles. Sounds
like profiles makes much more sense (though Integration, API, etc. App
Types will still be present).
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Afkham Azeez wro
It is good to think about profiles at a product level. It is also possible
to "host" new profiles after we ship the product. For example, let's say we
come across a use case or customer scenario where a subset of the features
is needed in certain runtimes. We can create profiles for that. We also
n
Yes.. How about the following. I think we should use singular names as the
profile names.
1. Web apps - webapp
2. Services - axis2service
3. DS - dataservice
4. Jaggery -jaggery
5. MS - mashup
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Kasun Gajasinghe wrote:
>
>> Yes. The list
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Kasun Gajasinghe wrote:
> Yes. The list is as follows.
>
> 1. Web apps
> 2. Services
> 2. DS
> 4. Jaggery
> 5. MS
>
We might want to use some meaningful names here rather than these
abbreviations.
> Thanks,
> KasunG
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Isur
Yes. The list is as follows.
1. Web apps
2. Services
2. DS
4. Jaggery
5. MS
Thanks,
KasunG
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Isuru Perera wrote:
> Hi Kasun,
>
> Will you be able to list the Application Server profiles here since not
> everyone has access to given link.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On We
Hi Kasun,
Will you be able to list the Application Server profiles here since not
everyone has access to given link.
Thanks!
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Kasun Gajasinghe wrote:
>
> AS will be providing following profiles. -
> https://redmine.wso2.com/issues/890
>
> Thanks,
> KasunG
>
>
AS will be providing following profiles. -
https://redmine.wso2.com/issues/890
Thanks,
KasunG
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Ajith Vitharana wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We were thinking about the same in the context of G-Reg. W
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Senaka Fernando wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We were thinking about the same in the context of G-Reg. We can have:
>
> 1. Repository Profile (what is typically used when G-Reg is used with
> products like ESB with mounting in place).
> 2. Governance Profile (the complete
Hi all,
We were thinking about the same in the context of G-Reg. We can have:
1. Repository Profile (what is typically used when G-Reg is used with
products like ESB with mounting in place).
2. Governance Profile (the complete G-Reg profile)
WDYT?
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:51
Profiles support is a major feature that comes with Carbon 4.2.0.
What I understood from the stand-up meetings we had on Carbon release
progress yesterday is that, products have not yet thought
about properly making use of this feature.
Front end / back end separation is just "scratching the surf
10 matches
Mail list logo