Following are few questions I have on C5 permission model. Answers may have
already been discussed, and I might have missed. If so, shall we get them
on mail.
Action namespaces
We have namespaced the permission by the “protocol” of the resource URI.
Then, do we need to namespace the actions as
Hi Manu,
Please find my inline comments.
Action namespaces
> We have namespaced the permission by the “protocol” of the resource URI.
> Then, do we need to namespace the actions as well? topoic:view, api:view,
> dashboard:view has almost the semantic. Having it just as “view” will be
> useful
Following are few questions I have on C5 permission model. Answers may have
already been discussed, and I might have missed. If so, shall we get them
on mail.
Action namespaces
We have namespaced the permission by the “protocol” of the resource URI.
Then, do we need to namespace the actions as
Hi Manu,
> Permissions for UI pages
> I think there is no need to introduce a separate permission namespace for
> UI (or use a very limited one). Actual customer is concerned about giving
> permission to a real resource (topic, API, proxy ...) not to a UI
> URL. Ideally, for each page, we
