Re: [Architecture] Persisting content into registry from the mediation layer

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Malaka Silva wrote: > Hi Ajith, > > It seems the change was not merge for some reason. [1] > > [1] https://github.com/wso2/wso2-synapse/pull/214 > Thanks Malaka. Created a JIRA to track https://wso2.org/jira/browse/ESBJAVA-4232 -Ajith > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015

Re: [Architecture] Persisting content into registry from the mediation layer

Hi Ajith, It seems the change was not merge for some reason. [1] [1] https://github.com/wso2/wso2-synapse/pull/214 On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Ajith Vitharana wrote: > Hi Buddhima > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Buddhima Wijeweera > wrote: > >> Hi Ajith, >> Example2 shows that: >>

Re: [Architecture] Persisting content into registry from the mediation layer

Hi Buddhima On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Buddhima Wijeweera wrote: > Hi Ajith, > Example2 shows that: > https://docs.wso2.com/display/ESB490/Property+Mediator > I'm getting following exception when I try to save the synapse config in ESB 4.9.0. [2015-09-22 11:41:35,940] INFO - Deploymen

Re: [Architecture] Persisting content into registry from the mediation layer

Hi Ajith, Example2 shows that: https://docs.wso2.com/display/ESB490/Property+Mediator Thanks, On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Ajith Vitharana wrote: > Hi All, > > Do we support this in ESB 4.9.0 ? if so please point me the doc. > > -Ajith > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Susinda Perera wro

Re: [Architecture] Persisting content into registry from the mediation layer

Hi All, Do we support this in ESB 4.9.0 ? if so please point me the doc. -Ajith On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Susinda Perera wrote: > Don't we need to restrict this to a particular space in registry? So that > this would not overwrite the wanted data. > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Kas

Re: [Architecture] Persisting content into registry from the mediation layer

Don't we need to restrict this to a particular space in registry? So that this would not overwrite the wanted data. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Kasun Indrasiri wrote: > Looks good. Please proceed with the fix and update the documentation. > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Nadeeshaan Guna

Re: [Architecture] Persisting content into registry from the mediation layer

Looks good. Please proceed with the fix and update the documentation. On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Nadeeshaan Gunasinghe wrote: > Hi all, > In order to persist content in to mediation layer I added an initial > implementation and via that we can use the following mediation logic to > store n

Re: [Architecture] Persisting content into registry from the mediation layer

Hi all, In order to persist content in to mediation layer I added an initial implementation and via that we can use the following mediation logic to store new persistent content in the registry, and In this implementation it uses scope to determine whether the content need to be stored persiste

Re: [Architecture] Persisting content into registry from the mediation layer

Hi, Yes this make sense if the provider does not support password grant type. But my concern is security. If we save the access tokens and refresh token it's visible to all parties. Can we do the same with secure-vault instead. WDYT? eg:- wso2:vault-lookup('UserManager.AdminUser.Password') ws

[Architecture] Persisting content into registry from the mediation layer

Hi, It is often required to persist content into the underlying registry impl during message mediation (in stateful mediation scenarios). For example, with connector we need to keep the access token/refresh token persisted. Therefore a generic mechanism of persisting content from mediation flow wi