Re: [Architecture] How to forcefully remove an entry from app factory registry path cache?

Hi Shazni and Pirinthapan, thanks for the clarification. On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Shazni Nazeer sha...@wso2.com wrote: Hi Manjula, Yes. The cacheId that you specify is not the the '*connectionId*' that we create in the method. When a resource is added to the cache we take the '

Re: [Architecture] [POC] Performance evaluation of Hive vs Shark

Hi David, Sorry to re-initiate this thread. But may I know if you have done any benchmarking on Datastax Spark cassandra connector and Stratio Deep-spark cassandra integration? Would love to take a look at it. I recently checked deep-spark github repo and noticed that there is no activity since

[Architecture] WSO2 Message Broker 3.0.0 Milestone 2 Released !

The WSO2 Message Broker team is pleased to announce the 2nd Milestone release of WSO2 Message Broker (MB) 3.0.0. WSO2 Message Broker (WSO2 MB) 3.0.0 is designed to be a fast, lightweight and user friendly open source distributed message brokering system under the Apache Software License v2.0

Re: [Architecture] Proposed ESB connector scenario - Integrating Canvas (LMS) with Eventbrite, MailChimp, GoogleCalendar, Facebook, GoToTraining and Disqus.

Hi All, Since the Eventbrite API has been changed recently, the scenarios will also be modified accordingly: *Course Creation and Marketing/Training Management* 1. A course can be created in Canvas as an offline process. 2. This course can be retrieved from Canvas and it can be created

Re: [Architecture] ESB connector scenario - Integrating Eventbrite with GoToWebinar, Facebook, ConstantContact, Gmail, Nexmo and SurveyMonkey

Hi All, Since the Eventbrite API has been changed recently, following steps will be revised accordingly, *Create Events and Tickets* · Create Webinars in GoToWebinar as an offline process of ESB. · Retrieve selected webinars from the GoToWebinar API and create events in the

[Architecture] Associating multiple lifecycles to a registry resource

Current G-Reg admin console is designed to associate only one Lifecycle with a registry resource at any given time but it seems we have valid use cases which require to associate more than one Lifecycle with a registry resource. E.g - ES + G-Reg integration - ES has an approval process which

Re: [Architecture] Associating multiple lifecycles to a registry resource

Hi Sagara, No there is no real-barrier. Even with SCXML this is possible. SCXML is just a standard for states and transitions. We create an instance of a state engine using a set of resource properties. If you want multiple lifecycles, and want to retain the same model, it is a matter of using

Re: [Architecture] Associating multiple lifecycles to a registry resource

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote: Hi Sagara, No there is no real-barrier. Even with SCXML this is possible. SCXML is just a standard for states and transitions. We create an instance of a state engine using a set of resource properties. If you want

Re: [Architecture] [POC] Performance evaluation of Hive vs Shark

Hi¡ Please, check the develop branch if you want to see a more realistic view of our development path. Last commit was about two hours ago :) Stratio Deep is one of our core modules so there is a core team in Stratio fully devoted to spark + noSQL integration. In these last months, for example,

Re: [Architecture] Moving deployment section from configuration xml and Facilitate AppFactory users to deploy apps with their custom app types if its not already available

Hi Dimuthu/All, In addition to this mail conversation we had discussed this in an internal forum, Here is the update of thatdiscussion As of today We are using appfactory.xml file for the runtime configurations the below fraction is the the configuration properties. ApplicationType name=*

Re: [Architecture] Moving deployment section from configuration xml and Facilitate AppFactory users to deploy apps with their custom app types if its not already available

HI Rajeevan, No GUI please. We are changing the whole user story here. thanks, dimuthu On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Aiyadurai Rajeevan rajeev...@wso2.com wrote: Hi Dimuthu/All, In addition to this mail conversation we had discussed this in an internal forum, Here is the update of

Re: [Architecture] Invitation: CDM Hackathon @ Mon Dec 1, 2014 1:30pm - 5:30pm (Sameera Perera)

Hi All, Few Corrections. This is December 2nd meeting minutes. Also need to add two things, 12. In the device table: need to change 'byod' field name to 'ownership'. 13. The current policy definition is just a set of actions that do not contain any applicable conditions, it was

Re: [Architecture] Moving deployment section from configuration xml and Facilitate AppFactory users to deploy apps with their custom app types if its not already available

Hi Dimuthu, Thanks for the suggestion. So, As a conclusion I will go ahead with the implementation as having a runtime.xml for the whole below peroperties and populate a map from there. Runtime Runtimeappserver/Runtime

Re: [Architecture] Associating multiple lifecycles to a registry resource

Hi Senaka/Sagara, IIUC in current registry API too there is no limitation to add more than one aspect. A point to consider in this implementation IMO is: should we consider allow any dependency between the life cycles attached in each context? As Senaka mentioned if we allow to attach 1..n