Re: [Architecture] PPaaS Artifact Migration Tool

Hi Malmee, It would be better if you can draw a component architecture diagram to illustrate how this tool works. This might help us to understand how much load it can handle if the existing Private PaaS 4.0.0 environment has considerable amount of artifacts and subscriptions and how those can

[Architecture] PPaaS Artifact Migration Tool

Hi All, We are developing a tool to convert PPaaS 4.0.0 artifact JSON files to PPaaS 4.1.x. [1] There are changes in the artifacts deployment process in PPaaS 4.0.0 compared to 4.1.0. So this tool is developed for those who need to migrate from PPaaS 4.0.0 to 4.1.0. We take the artifacts JSONs

Re: [Architecture] Implementing a WSO2 PaaS with Kubernetes

Great! Thanks Chamila! I have now moved Kubernetes membership scheme from [1] to the same repository [2]: Next I will be moving the ESB Kubernetes artifacts [3], then will be creating the Dockerfile to generate a pre-configured Docker image with Puppet + Hiera. [1]

[Architecture] Carbon Feature Plugin 2.0.0 Released!

*WSO2 Carbon Feature plugin 2.0.0 Released!* We are pleased to inform you that the carbon feature plugin 2.0.0 is now available to use. Source for this release is available here. Documentation for WSO2 carbon feature plugin 2.0.0

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] Web Application Statistics Monitoring for Application Server 6.0.0

[Moving to Architecture group] On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Nuwan Pallewela wrote: > [Moving thread to Architecture group] > > Hi Nathasha, > > Is statistics information get update per minute? > Do we have the capability to update the statistics using a refresh button > or

Re: [Architecture] App Factory Tier Implementation

Hi Dakshika, On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Dakshika Jayathilaka wrote: > Hi, > > I have few questions on above user stories, > > 1. How* "setup Eng"* define base currency for this? (USD, LKR) > Billing should be handled by a different application and we need to remove

Re: [Architecture] App Factory Tier Implementation

Hi Imesh, See my comments inline, > >- I can see the term "gear" is used in the tables but it's not >described. Is this an unit of resources (CPU, memory, disk, etc)? If so how >do we plan to control that for a cluster of containers? > > Yes "Gear" is an unit of resources, but AFAIU

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] Web Application Statistics Monitoring for Application Server 6.0.0

> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Nathasha Naranpanawa >> wrote: >> >>> >>>- Adding a custom Valve to the tomcat server in order to collect >>>data from the server. >>> >>> Can you please explain more details about this valve? - What would be the approach taken to

Re: [Architecture] [BPMN] Implementing correlation support for BPMN Rest API

Hi Chathura, Shouldn't we provide messageName or signalName irrespective of the availability of process definition key or id. Once we queried an execution, I think we need either a message name or a signal name to trigger the receive event. Please check with API. We need to have the process

Re: [Architecture] App Factory Tier Implementation

Few questions/points: - I can see the term "gear" is used in the tables but it's not described. Is this an unit of resources (CPU, memory, disk, etc)? If so how do we plan to control that for a cluster of containers? - What would be the entity that a tenant admin would subscribe to?

Re: [Architecture] PPaaS Artifact Migration Tool

Hi Imesh, We will include a component architecture diagram of the PPaaS Artifact Migration Tool. Thanks. On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote: > Hi Malmee, > > It would be better if you can draw a component architecture diagram to > illustrate how this tool

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [ESB] Deprecated features in ESB 4.10

@Kathees : Can we verify NTLM use cases with Call mediator + blocking behavior? I guess it should work out of box as we also reuse the same blocking sender code? For DB* mediators, I guess we can clearly mention in the docs that these mediators can be only used for very limited kind of DB

Re: [Architecture] App Factory Tier Implementation

Thanks for the clarifications Kasun! On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Kasun De Silva wrote: > Hi Imesh, > > See my comments inline, > >> >>- I can see the term "gear" is used in the tables but it's not >>described. Is this an unit of resources (CPU, memory, disk, etc)?

Re: [Architecture] [BPMN] Implementing correlation support for BPMN Rest API

> > > We need to have the process definition id, in case there are multiple > versions of the same process definition exists with in the engine. Because > of this we are having it as an optional parameter. > I agree with that. But can we make message name optional? We use process definition id,

Re: [Architecture] App Factory Tier Implementation

Hi All, *​Further clarification of Tier User Stories.* Appfactoery set up engineer will define the container_specs. As an example t2.small with the features CPU 1, memory 2 and memeory 4GB. He will also be defining the subscription plans. Then organizations(Tenants) can subscribe to the plans.

Re: [Architecture] [MSS] Return javax.ws.rs.core.Response while running OSGi mode

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Aruna Karunarathna wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Aruna Karunarathna > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Sameera Jayasoma >> wrote: >> >>> I guess this a bug. You can fix this

Re: [Architecture] [MSS] Return javax.ws.rs.core.Response while running OSGi mode

Yes it is working. I have tested it with both OSGi bundle mode & deployable jar mode in the MSS server runtime. On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Sagara Gunathunga wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Aruna Karunarathna wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 30,

Re: [Architecture] [MSS] Return javax.ws.rs.core.Response while running OSGi mode

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > Yes it is working. I have tested it with both OSGi bundle mode & > deployable jar mode in the MSS server runtime. > Great ! Thanks ! > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Sagara Gunathunga > wrote: > >>

Re: [Architecture] Issue when you start up MSS in server mode

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > The deployment engine should call the deployer only for valid artifact > types. So yes, it looks like the fixes have to be done in the kernel. > In addition to *.txt files I'm getting same exception for .DS_Store file

[Architecture] Have we considered using pre-compiled handlebars?

Hi Manu/SameeraM, $Subject? I'm just wondering if we've already got some mechanism/model to use pre-compiled [1] handlebars in applications developed with Jaggery + handlebars. [1] http://handlebarsjs.com/precompilation.html Cheers, Prabath -- Prabath Abeysekara Technical Lead WSO2 Inc. Email:

Re: [Architecture] [Dev] [ESB] Deprecated features in ESB 4.10

Hi DB mediator can be handy as you said but it is a bad practice to query the DB right from the Esb. It is against the low coupling principles that makes integration layer agile and thin and scalable etc. DSS is setup in two minutes and can fulfill your needs out of the box. Maybe we

[Architecture] Implementing Latency Metrics Calculation Feature in GW

Hi all , We can include feature for Latency measurement of GW requests and other relevant parameters related to connections. I have came up with a initial architecture diagram of the module as below ​ - Each message going through GW should be able to store timestamps related to