[Archivesspace_Users_Group] Running archivesspace from systemd

Hi All, I'm trying to run the archivesspace daemon from a systemd unit file but I'm getting an odd delay. If I start archivesspace manually by running "$ sudo archivesspace.sh start" things run normally, but when I start archivesspace from systemctl then any operation on port 8080 delays from 10

[Archivesspace_Users_Group] Deleting a user account

Hello- When I go to delete a user account, I get the following warning: Delete this Record? Please be aware you cannot undo this action. This action will remove the record from the database, including any references it has to other records. Does this have an effect on the data in

Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] PUI search results

Rebecca, Ah, thanks; I didn't notice that detail earlier this morning. It must be that the collection name is part of the top container record, then, and that's indexed as part of the component record (and that would be the reason why component 6 shows up, since it has both collection names

Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] PUI search results

Thanks for the information Mark! With regards to sandbox example, the Samuel D. Rockenbach Papers actually has four components (http://public.archivesspace.org/repositories/2/resources/1319), but "Component Four" is not being retrieved with that search (only Components 1-3 are showing up).

Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Python ArchivesSpace scripting library

Thanks for all the feedback and offers of help! I’m going to talk to Christine and Laney hopefully sometime this week, and then we can get started for real. I think Dave’s on the right track that the first thing would be to gather a corpus of examples/functionality that we’d like to include.

Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] PUI search results

Rachel, >From your example that includes 5 search results, I can say that the first 4 >results with the out-of-the-box PUI are intentional, since those first 4 >results occur within the Rockenback papers. That last search result for >component 6, though, is not intentional! I'm afraid that

Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Python ArchivesSpace scripting library

This is an idea we've toyed around with as well--I'm sure one or more of us could contribute, too. Keep us posted! Max On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Jason Loeffler wrote: > Don't want to add any overhead to this but at one point late last year I > recall a proposal

Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] MARCXML export archival objects

Thank you everyone, for your responses. We don't have any IT staff in our library, so while the OAI-PMH looks interesting, I'm not sure we'll have the ability to take advantage of it. I'll keep an eye out for updates that the ticket is being slated for development. Michelle

Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Issue with 2.1.0 upgrade

Christine, I don’t know if it was our server running slow or something, but I just tested our first initial upgrade to 2.1.0 from 2.0, and the indexing took almost a full week. In the past it used to take 36-48 hours and we could be done over the weekend. I think I’d like to test everything

Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Container Profiles and the Extent/Space Calculators

Thanks Mark! That's exactly what I was looking for. On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Custer, Mark wrote: > Dan, > > > > That feature should be configurable. At least, I know for sure that it > was configurable when this feature was in a plugin, but since our hosted is >

Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Container Profiles and the Extent/Space Calculators

Dan, That feature should be configurable. At least, I know for sure that it was configurable when this feature was in a plugin, but since our hosted is still reporting linear feet, not inches (which I believe is the default, as you’ve noted), I’m quite sure this option still exists (I just

Re: [Archivesspace_Users_Group] Container Profiles and the Extent/Space Calculators

Hi Christine, Thanks for your response, but I'm not sure I understand. Since only one extent dimension is allowed, the calculator only tells me the linear measurement (height, width, *or *depth) of the boxes. I'm looking for the cubic measurement (height, with, *and* depth). Unless I'm missing