Representing ARIN member organisation GLEXI-3 *I do not support* the policy
as written. Maximum wait list allocation should be at least a /21. We have
a direct unmet need for a /21 right now.
My argument is if an organisation receives an allocation from the wait list
they should have to return
David,
I would rather see a limit or delay on the number of times an organization can
go back to the waitlist than prevent organizations from getting any space from
the wait list.
Would I be more supportive if the number was larger? I don’t believe that is
the right control mechanism, so no.
If /20 is too small is their another size you would propose? a /19 or a /18
maybe? Do you have an argument for why that is the right number?
When the AC looked at this there was strong support for limiting the size
of the organization that could qualify to ensure these resources went to
smaller
At the last meeting there was significant information given to the community
and a very strong consensus that the Wait List should be limited to /22.
I don’t recall any discussion on the size of the ORG’s current number resources
being a qualifier.
I haven’t seen the math behind the /20
I do not support the new text, specifically the limit of a /20 per
organization.
The limiting of an organization to an aggregate of a /20 is a huge hinderance
of the ability of a smaller ISP to compete. A smaller ISP that can win
business on service and cost could lose that same business due
