In message ,
Seth Mattinen wrote:
>The best part is that it was likely this guy's own doing that got the
>microscope turned on him by immediately suing ARIN in federal court when
>confronted with revocation. I love seeing lawsuit happy people get their
>BS thrown back in their face.
Yes,
In message ,
John Curran wrote:
>> Require FAXed copy of driver's license, national ID card or passport.
>
>Yes, we've been doing that for years it is of limited help.
Whoa whoa whoa. Wait a second here John. Are you saying that ARIN
is in possession of FAXed copies of personal
On 5/15/19 11:44 AM, Mike Burns wrote:
Other shoe dropped yesterday.
https://ecf.scd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/qrySummary.pl?250341
20 counts of wire fraud.
Makes sense. Obtain addresses fraudulently and sell them - instant wire
fraud. All the falsely notarized documents pile on the hurt.
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:25 PM David Farmer wrote:
> Krebs has a good write up too
>
> https://krebsonsecurity.com/2019/05/a-tough-week-for-ip-address-scammers/
>
I love the price inflation. First it was $15-$18. Then the indictment says
$15-$19. Now Krebs is saying $15-$25.
-Bill
--
Krebs has a good write up too
https://krebsonsecurity.com/2019/05/a-tough-week-for-ip-address-scammers/
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:57 PM Mike Burns wrote:
> From the indictment:
>
>
>
> Substitution of assets:
>
>
>
> If any of the assets described above as being subject to forfeiture, as a
>
John —
Perhaps we should deputise ARIN employees as federal law enforcement
officers, provide them training and firearms, and let them root out
the rampent abuse in IP allocation. I think people would think twice
if they knew lying to ARIN was lying to a federal agent. They also
wouldn’t want the
Another reason why we shouldn’t allow IP blocks received via the
waitlist to be transferred to any other party aside for back to ARIN.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 15 May 2019, at 18:18, John Curran wrote:
>
>> On 15 May 2019, at 2:47 PM, Tom Fantacone wrote:
>> If we remove the waiting list
On 15 May 2019, at 2:47 PM, Tom Fantacone wrote:
> If we remove the waiting list activity of this one fraudster, how much
> "statistically likely" fraud is left?
> Was this one bad actor so bad that he accounted for almost all the likely
> fraud on the waiting list?
> Do we still even have a
> Mike Burns
> Other shoe dropped yesterday.
> https://ecf.scd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/qrySummary.pl?250341
Here's one easier to access :
http://www.circleid.com/pdf/golstan_indict_filed_20190515.pdf
Michel.
___
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message
In article ,
William Herrin wrote:
So, is it just me, or is this not a red flag to anybody else?
It's just you. It's pretty routine to incorporate in a different state than
where you get your mail and operate in a still different set of states
under a business name different enough to defy
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 1:18 PM Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
> Funny thing... not a single one of them seems to actually be registered
> with
> any of the relevant state authorities to do business in their alleged home
> states.
>
> So, is it just me, or is this not a red flag to anybody else?
In message
,
Michel Py wrote:
>- What have we learned from this ?
>- Moving forward, in the wake of this, are there any policy changes we
> can make to try to prevent this from happening in the future ?
Require FAXed copy of driver's license, national ID card or passport.
That's just one
I just wanted to share these links I found.
I'm not sure what the implications are of the fact that many of these
sock puppet companies got registered also as official RIPE members,
but I can think of a few plausible inferences...
https://www.ripe.net/membership/indices/data/us.oppobox.html
When I applied last Fall for ARIN resources including an AS (issued as
AS397138) they required significant documentation of my business and a
copy of my business license. The City of Palo Alto had issued a business
license marked "ReidBrian", which was good enough to open a bank
account,
>From the indictment:
Substitution of assets:
If any of the assets described above as being subject to forfeiture, as a
result of any act or omission of the defendants:
a)cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence
b)has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with a third
There is provision for the forfeited assets to be substituted by other property
of equal value if certain conditions are met.
One of these conditions is if the assets have been transferred to a third
person.
I think the pound of flesh will be forthcoming even if the addresses themselves
are
In this 3 places, John states addresses will be revoked:
* https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2019-May/033250.html
* https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2019-May/033234.html
* https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2019-May/033232.html
I was wondering if this
In message ,
John Curran wrote:
>It's far less likely that anyone would be able to reproduce this
>specific fraud, particular given that ARIN is now aware and can detect far
>earlier,
Well, can we talk about that just a little bit?
I will stipulate up front that I already know that you are
I’d presume that if the blocks are forfeited to the US government, they will
then be monetized on the transfer market, like most other forfeited assets; I
wouldn’t expect them to be locked away*. Might take a while for the blocks to
fall out of the routing table and actually become usable,
I have reviewed the indictment and it has a forfeiture order in it. It lists
the blocks and states that they shall be forfeited to the United States.
Now, my question is, does that affect ARIN reclaiming the blocks if they are
surrendered to the government?
Douglas Haber
Managing Member
Garden
> Martin Hannigan wrote :
> https://www.postandcourier.com/business/charleston-tech-firm-and-its-ceo-are-indicted-for-fraud/article_4ce68788-773c-11e9-845d-d358d719d2df.html
This one is for you, rfg.
Michel.
___
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this
And PR
https://www.postandcourier.com/business/charleston-tech-firm-and-its-ceo-are-indicted-for-fraud/article_4ce68788-773c-11e9-845d-d358d719d2df.html
/lawnchair
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 14:44 Mike Burns wrote:
> Other shoe dropped yesterday.
>
>
Other shoe dropped yesterday.
https://ecf.scd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/qrySummary.pl?250341
20 counts of wire fraud.___
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Hi John,
>>> John Curran wrote :
>>> ARIN will revoke in aggregate 532,480 IPv4 addresses.
>> Can we have a breakdown by prefix length ?
>> How many /24s, /23s /22s, and so ?
>> Not asking for specifics, just a summary.
> Total /15: 1
> Total /17: 5
> Total /18: 13
> Total /19: 3
> Total
On 14 May 2019, at 11:27 PM, Michel Py
wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
>> John Curran wrote :
>> ARIN will revoke in aggregate 532,480 IPv4 addresses.
>
> Can we have a breakdown by prefix length ?
> How many /24s, /23s /22s, and so ?
> Not asking for specifics, just a summary.
Total /15: 1
On 15 May 2019, at 2:53 AM, Michael Williams
wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> I’m confused... how is ARIN *not* a law enforcement body? I’ve always been
> told to believe ARIN enforces the rules of the internet.
Michael -
ARIN doesn’t enforce “rules of the internet” – we enforce Internet
On 14 May 2019, at 10:30 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
mailto:r...@tristatelogic.com>> wrote:
...
I can say without hesitation that *I* would like to be in the receiving end
of these kinds of consequences also.
Ronald -
- It’s far less likely that anyone would be able to reproduce this specific
27 matches
Mail list logo
